So, Jamie, you might wonder why itâs taken this long to get up another post about you? I needed time to thinkâthatâs the answer. All the earlier distractions have stopped and to make sense of my new life come itâs taken me so long to put up another post?
Iâm at a new stage. How to reflect that in this piece of writing? Like Philip Marlow in MURDER MY SWEET expressing how he felt the first time after getting âsappedâ: âA black pool opened at my feet. I dived in. It never stopped.â
Kind of.
But youâre another kind of spaceman. More like the one whose umbilical connecting him to the ship gets cut by the evil HAL the computer and we watch, in 2001 A SPACE ODDESSY, as he goes tumbling in utter black emptiness. Forever and ever. While Iâm the one that staysâthat the computer doesnâtâor hasnât yet anywayâdisconnected.
You said youâd find me if you had to sniff me out.
You also by your love of the desert and the consequences of this are an example stillâfor me when my own time comes. What do I mean by this?
Oh thereâs the nature mysticism you always quoted about how it was for you growing up. How in times of trouble youâd get of your horse and just ride out until you got far away enough from everything, every little sounds even, and it was total silence and youâd think: the hills crumble, those pine trees will fall. Just as they are born so all the animals too will do the sameâcome to an end. Itâs just how things are. Things emergeâthen go back. To what? you never askedâphilosophy didnât impress you much. But all that nature, and the blankness of just desert between things there, like the cactus and scrubâthat blanknessâmaybe that was where things went?
You accepted your sickness and death just like that. You were no different from any pine or hill or mountain lionâeverything comes from somewhere, wherever it is, stays a little or even a long time, and thenâthere it goes, back to where it came from: are we any different? youâd ask me. And thatâs what gave you that sense of peaceâright in the middle of painâand acceptance, I saw. When itâs time, itâll be your example Iâll be trying to follow. Just acceptâacceptance.
Not that you donât do what you can to avoid what you can. Like the pain. Like that story of your daddy who you lovedâthatâs engraved in my mind. When Jamieâs dad was dyingâalso, like his mom later, of lung cancer, he was in terrible pain. Heâd ask his son, little Jamie at, what? maybe in his early teens? to bring him some of that Ole Jack.
So Jamieâd sneak in a pint of Jack Daniels to alleviate his dadâs pain. It really helped. Only thereâs always a spoiler out there just waitingâto make good things bad, and bad worse. And in this case it was his daddyâs nurse: âGet that outta here we donât allow that kinda stuff here now you go ahead and git it OUT and I MEAN IT.â Nurse Ratched. But once in a while fate is good to youâand passing by in the corridor outside this particular day was Jamieâs dadâs doctor. Who overhears this tiradeâand lickity split roars into the room and snatches the bottle out of Ratchedâs hands, to the sighs of relief from father and son, and he tells the nurse: Look, if I EVERâŚEVERâŚsee you trying to keep a dying man from one of the few satisfactions he as once more, youâll be outta here on your ass. And donât think Iâm kidding!
I like that story. Go figure. Justice isnât always picky about being polite and genteelâlike I guess the medical profession is supposed to be. And this is a town thatâs so close to being still part of the American fronteer that you can smell it, taste it. One thing they did have going for them, despite all the bad parts I could tell you aboutâis rough-hewn or notâitâs not exactly law that counts the most but instead they invoke tradition. If a man is dying give him whisky goddamn youâGIVE it to him, heâs in PAIN.
I saw thatânot about his dad dyingâbut the acceptance that shows through those leathery faces down there. At some point or other HAL the computer is going to get the other astronaut isnât he? if you stop to think? Itâs inevitable. And inevitable is next to accept.
So what about me thenâthe other spaceman awaiting HAL to get ME? At this point it canât be that long can it? Can a person prepare?
This is where the next stage I mentioned comes in. When I made my trip to go see your family, Gaetha and Monty especially.
And I donât knowâit was something like a revelation I guess, like the one, the koan I mean, about the monk who does his zazen daily every time youâre supposed to, sees his master at dokusan for advice, reads the sutrasâand everything. The years go by and he doesnât achieve enlightenment. And I guess Iâm kind of like that monkâgoing down to the desert to look for something not even knowing what. But I did. It happened. And like the monkâwho having given up ever getting to be enlighted and having become an old man contents himself with just gardeningâfor the monastery. Heâs given up all hope. Heâll never be enlightened but at least he can do good works to make better karma for himself for the next lifetime maybe. And then it happens. A tile falls off the roofâand suddenly: heâs enlightened.
Sheâyour sister Monty-Jeanâwanted to take me out and show me some desert I hadnât seen yet, the altaplano, a huge mesa. We winded up and had a little lunch at one of those little hidden spaces in the cliff where thereâs some trees and maybe a gas station and restaurant. After we climbed higher and reached the mesaâbeing now about, oh, maybe three or four hours into our day-long trip. We go along the flat land with every once in a while something green, then at this place, this certain place, she says why donât we stop here?
We do. Itâs the edge of the mesa and you can see along the stream in the canyon below itty-bitty dots that turn out to be pine trees. Weâre higher up than Iâd thought. She doesnât say anything but just lets me do whatever it is I want to. I approach the edgeâof the mesaâlooking down. I smell the sharp smell of the pines to my right, and thereâs a little bit of wind, not hardly any at all, but a little, thatâs all, beginning top spring up. No planes or their sonic waste clutter this scene or the sky aboveâand all is just quiet. Total silence. I stand there and I standâin total silenceâand no one bothers me. I can take my time. I just let it sink it standing as still as I can just like you like to sit as still as you can on your zafu at meditation. Just silence. Emptinessâthatâs incredibly beautiful. And it kicks me up a notch to this new stage. Where being there on the silent mesa all alone by myself and just letting it take over me, I can feel something happen. Itâs not cognition. Itâs not perception. Itâs like the Ancestors sayâmind and body fall away.
And thatâs my stage, the stage Iâm at now. It lastedâthat time in the high desertâand itâs with me now still. And itâs changed someone about our relationâgoing from you being one person and me another to something that blurs or neglects thatâso it just falls away. Have we merged molecular structures so weâre the same or what? Once you start to merge, it doesnât end. Might start with nature. But itâs people tooâusâyou and me, darlinâ, you and me now too.
*
The names Bruce and Jamie swinging on a porch. Dropping down on the desert like raindrops right before spring flowers come up. And in the evil little critters too, the tarantulas our car ran over, sunning themselves, the rattlers out there sometimes not two steps from you and you donât even realize. All that.
*
Iâm mixing this all up purposefully, I donât want there to be any order that can make someone make a narrative out of it. Fuck narrative. These are just bits and snatches of something that the politics of time just would want to ruin, and I donât want that.
So Iâll start doing a lot of backtracking now.
His death. Bruce asleep with his ear plugs as usualâwhat a dummyâdoesnât hear the hospital call. But getting up about eight real fast shakes off the sleep, realizes he has to check the phone for messages. âHe died this morning at about 4:30am, we tried to get to you but nobody picked upâcall when you get this.â I donât think heâd miss my missing his death because of during that time when I was being a chaplain full-time up at UC Med Center? I noticed that really a lot of people wait for their family to go outâto get dinner or whatever. In other words they donât die on our schedule but theirsâand mostly that means alone.
SoâŚwhat then?
I grab little Sadie up under one armâa position she doesnât like (and lets me know this very clearly) but itâs easier for me when in a hurry. I throw on some clothes and then Iâm off,twenty minutes later in the hospital, near his room. Someone wants to go with me. How come? Like I donât ALREADY know where the room is, with the body of my beloved still in it, though now, I hear, all washed and ânice.â What an ugly word, nice. And anyway I prefer being in private when I want an emotional breakdown.
Heâs all marble. This really beautiful wrinkle free and beautifully off-white color (all white is too deathly, called the âcolor of atheismâ in MOBY DICK, which could be worse I guess). I mean he just radiates. I kiss him. On his forehead. Then that beautiful hand that drove me places, fixed the carpentry and electricity that went wrongâI was almost going to say his manhood. But no, that was limp. It implied to me when I saw it something almost contemptibleâhe wasnât a man any more, a human I mean, a human being any more. It wasnât about balls but about the change: from human being to just meat. Dead meat. (Heraklitus said, about any corpse that you would find in the city, throw it out, fast! itâs just garbage and doesnât mean a thing.
Sheâthe dogâwas whining so I put her up on the sheet covering him and she started toward him then stopped. Kind of like turning up her nose. It was an act of disavowal: this isnât my daddy, I donât know what it is. Did she get these vibes from me? I think itâs the natural response. I like the Eastern response, starting with the Vedics, and the Iranians after, and then Buddhists in general, us zens like to do thatâitâs like itâs pure. Or maybe better putâpurifying. Flame purifes. I wanted him put into the cremation oven but they said that will take a couple of days and the thought of him lying all alone down there in some morgue drawer for a whole two days just floored me. Turn on the gass now. This isnât himâwherever he isâitâs NOT Jamie. She and I got out of Dodge fast at that point. Left the body, returned to the apartment.
Services? He was so alone up here, said I was his whole world and didnât want to know anybody else. And his sister wanted half the ashes to put, as he wanted, with his mother in her grave in Carlsbad. So be it.
We had our ceremony presided over by David my gardiner friend whoâs an ordained zen priestâso he knew all the things to do. People seemed to aggree: impressive. And David chose his ceremonial things well. They ate afterwards and went home, and that was that.
But not for me.
Not for me.
I already know the room, god knows I was there plenty of times I swear (do they think I need âemotional supportâ? Ick.) And then Iâm off. By the time Because I might need âemotional helpâ? WrongâI cry on my own time. didnât hear the phone ring because it accidentally fell off the hook. Too bad. Or maybe notâwhat do you think? I get their urgent messages and stowing Sadie under my arm decide to walk the eight or so short blocksâto the hospital where you are. Then enter the room.
You all marble nowâreally! all laid out and bathed, naked under your sheet,dazzling white like one of your communityâs babtist congregants. Itâs like heaven. Your wrinkles all gone because the pain causing them gone. More beautiful than life. And thatâs maybe what should have put me on notice. Not that you stinked yet. But it wasnât you. I kissed that lovely forehead. Touched your lips. It wasnât youâI hated it. And the limp cock, your tool of majesty I so often kissed, worshipped. Limp means your manhoodâs goneâdespite that theyâll say this is politically incorrect, do I give a damn?
But now youâre meat. Or what was you is. Throw a dead body over the wall as fast as you can said Heraklitus. It pollutes the purity of the city.
I turned away, disgusted. This is not you. How can they say itâs you. Itâs dirty dead meat thatâs all. Throw it out. I have no use for it, I think. And putting Sadie up on the bed for one last look, she takes a step and stops. Yeah sheâs looking all right but more than that sheâs smelling. And itâs just a corpse she smells. Turns up her nose, turns away from youâjust as I do.
And out the door.
*
(note to readers: friends please bear with me, Iâm new to the technology of this and the following material needs to more editing, so actually it got published âby mistakeââso if you can please hold off reading until you see this parenthetical paragraph disappear and the rest of the material below will then be ready for you to read)
I donât know where to put this oneâitâs not really related. So Iâll stick it here.
Itâs about mischeviousness, Jamieâs and his communityâs. Where to start.
First time at Grannieâs Jamie showed me my tiny roomâhe would take the floorâeverything there was poor and so small, small. He came in to tell me something. About the critters.
He said in the morning, because you never know, shake out your shoes. Cause an animal, a little scorpion, or a rattler, it might have got in. So you got to shake em before putting em on. Is this a joke? No, he said solemnly, weâre sitting on top of the Sonoran desert. You got to shake them out in the morning. Ugh, I goâyou never told me about thisâhow will I ever dare?
Come morning though I did, I shook em all outâand nothing came out. I was met at breakfast by Jamie and Grannie breaking into laughter when I told them about this. Since it turns out really thereâs only a scorpion or black widow or rattler or something that gets in about once every three years, so you really donât have to worry. It was a practical joke of theirs.
I vowed revenge. I got it. From Jamieâbut Iâm not going to tell you about this one because itâs boring. But Iâll tell you about the way I âgotâ Grannie because it tells about the whole culture of them down there, him included, not just Grannie, but all of them. (Sheâs typical in never in her long life ever having been more further than to El Pasoâand believe you me, thatâs not saying too damn much!)
I said, you know us Catholics (I should have said ex Catholics now Buddhists but figured that was too complex of an explanation) have this ritual that you have to do, oh about when youâre a teen, or you canât be a Catholic. âWhat?â she asked, curious. Well, I said, first you got to find yourself a Protestant baby (and mind youâeverybody white at least down there is babtist), then you all gather in a circle way away from anybody. Grannyâs eyes got real big here on the verge of the saucers they would become)âwell, I said, pausingâand then you got to sacrifice it. Or you canât become a Catholic. âNo!!!!â to her great horror, goes Grannie. Jamie, heâs just trying real real hard to suppress laughing. I tell Granny YES! and she is so shocked she practically yelps. âOhhhhhhhhh my goodness.â
Course I didnât leave her ignorant for long, that woulda been cruel and she was one of the kindest ladies I have ever met and I loved her. So I disabused herâafter just a moment. I had âgotâ her. She smiled. âWell you got me good with that one but you watch, Iâll get you good too.â
And she did. In a little innocent non-harmful way that was the closest she ever got to naughty, I guessâwhich wasnât too close. he was astounded, as he had just assumed only Mexicans were that.) I said well we had some interesting rituals, as all Catholics throughout the world did. For instance I saidânoting her eyes beginning to grow largerâthereâs the ceremony we do with Protestant badies. She had the beginnings of fear on her face now. âWhat?â Well to become a Catholic you donât just have to be baptized but around the age of 12 thereâs this ceremony where we all gather (and here her eyes were becoming saucers) and sacrifice a Protestant baby.
There was a long silence. I could see Jamie was having trouble trying to keep a straight face but his mother was absolutely stricken. Then Jamie let out with this great yowl. Which let Grannie know it was just a joke, a practical joke. And I told herââGrannie, I got you good on that one didnât I?â I did. And this innocent humor was typically âcountryââitâs not so far from the innocent sentimentality about sex and romance you hear on country records.
And like I said, I do have my Buck Owens.
Innocent Jamie, too. Guileless, easy to cheat. And he GOT cheated. For all his country stuff which many mistook for being dumb (his twang at the bank meant to the tellers that he was stupid) he was a very smart man. I know that. I had more education, he had lessâso what? Plenty of dumb academics of there and lots of real intelligent countryâbut you wouldnât know it for the image theyâre represented by. Oh well.
Innocence. Jamie was as good a fighter in Carlsbad as they came. Only when learning he made the mistake of giving the other guy a chance. He knocked down this one guy giving him trouble and the guy just lay there. Later heâd learn in jail and other places that when you fight you got to go for blood. But now he just let the guy slowly get to his feetâthen give Jamie a punch that could have been spared if Jamie after getting him down just pounded the shit out of him. That was Jamieâs guilelessness, innocence. And some lessons in mistrusting human nature he never learned. Even when he was with me.
Heâd got out for marijuana and come back with straw. Iâd say let me smell that and see it. He gives it over. I smell and just from the smell right away you can tell it IS strawâand heâs cheated again. Over-trusting.
He was smart all right. But never got too far in this world.
I loved that in him and always will. Innocence. Oh yeah he should have been more aware, but I liked him just the way he was. Loved in fact. I guess thatâs what I wanted to sayâbefore we leave this horrible hospital room that doesnât have him in it anymore but just a dead body.
Throw it out.
Of course I was terrified and you never saw anything shake anything like I rattled those shoes of mineâholding them as far from me as possible. Nothing came out. But I noticed nobody else shook their shoes getting up that morning. Why? First I thought it was a jokeâoh, how could rattlers get in, in here? ThenShoes. Iâll close this interlude before more Rome with this. It shows Jameâs mischeviousness I guess. First visit to Grannie, bed-time arrives, Iâm shown my room and after lights out Jamie sneaks in to snuggle a little. )Bishop Pike the controversial Episcopal bishop of Grace cathedral in the 60shim through year was testing myself. What I found was that Jamie was floating further and further into outer space away from me: I seemed to be losing memories, he seemed less present to me when the thought occurred, there was less intensity of love for him and yearning. And yet what could be more important for me in this last part of life than to keep his presence with me in mutual love. What had gone wrong?
In the meantime there were changes in what can I call it? a âpyschicâ or âparanormalâ self? This became clear one night when again I was awakened by a swirling vortex of whispers of whisperingâwhich gradually became clearer. They were as if fractured HIS voice. As if you could shatter a voice like glass and then what would you have? This was a development from my audible (not mental) hearing of him in the hallway earlier calling my name loudly, twice. What did it indicate about Jamieâor about my relationship with him? If now there could be a Jamie splintered in many different places what sort of Jamie would that be. I decided it would be a Jamie scattered to the world, being at once both Jamie and all that isâcall it Buddhacitta if the realization is present. The non-discriminating mind doesnât just think this and that and neither does it think just âoneâ or âoneness.â It is unaware of the difference between those two statements. That is how I took that tissue-paper-thin sound of the simultaneous whispering voices of a dispersed Jamie.
When Seth the brother that sets bad things in motion appears, he seeks out his brother Osiris to cut him into pieces. In the end, as we know from the story, the sister-wife of Osiris, Isis, who has spent an undetermined but extremely lengthy period of time looking for and finding part after part of the unjustly tossed-away parts of her husband, when she succeeds, she succeeds by magic. You cannot rule out something as âdumbâ as that. Nothing can be ruled out. I can see and hear Jamie. Now. After death. Dogen: delusion and reality, the same. Just as if the lesson Jamie was trying to impart were exactly that thereâs no longer a discrimination between Jamie and all else but neither does that discrimination fail to be present, either.
For a sensitive young boy like Jamie, growing up at the northern end of the Sonoran desert such a mysticismâunconsciously evenâwould have developed from the circumstances of a time and a place where what Zen master Dogen calls âthe great matterâ andââthe great matter of life and death. The desertâs nature is always the cutting edge. The green pines in their maturity today that tomorrow, in the spring, youâll find picked bare as a boneâas if taken by a raptor. The continuous awareness that develops when a misstep, a miscalculationâforgetting enough water in a day-treck out into the sands around you, or the lack of enough blankets, clothing, means of fire, at night. Daily animals in the wild that kill with barely a thoughtâscorpion to mountain lion.
I remember on a two lane âhighwayâ riding with him to a neighboring townâit was midday and shortly after, when hottestâhow the pickup truck passed over what in the distance looked like a dark pool of oil but hearing the squishing sound as we passed over them and looking out I saw what Jamie told me was not an unusual phenomenon, the roads being near-deserted most timesâthe early afternoon gathering of vast numbers of tarantulas in one spot, sunning themselves, soaking up as much of the heat they needed for a continuation of their lives.
Mountains as he surely saw here and there collapsed in landslides. The wild animals of which the desert was full would be found in spring as skeletons. And beneath your feet would be the vast square miles of tunnels of which the Carlsbad Caverns, a few miles away, was only a larger space, one of the calm places where the rush of whatever made the underground everywere around here porous with infinite holos, caves, tunnels, a whole network of empty areas of dark and silence.
With his dad on day-long or longer trapping expeditions, little Jamie was made away that upon an awareness of this life-turning-into-death hung the family income: and the father made the son dwell on the natural perceptions he already would have been havingâso the net effect would have been a very highly developed awareness of time passing, which is after all only change, or its measuring, and its end: an equation through time of mountain pine, rattler, cactus, scorpionâwith his own life as a progress to an ending.
We talked and talked at the endâin his hospital room. Heâd want to be wheeled out in his wheelchair, plastic tubes flying, machines still ticking where heâd delight in turning his chair around and around to push him to a state of vertigo. Heâs known all his life that all of life is always leaving. But why should that stop you from squeezing as much enjoyment as you can down to the last minute?
Of death there was nothing to discuss. You come into existence and you go out of existence. Thereâs nothing to think about, speculate on, worse. When I asked him how he could be so accepting in the face of his own deathâas a genuine question, not a covert rebuke or even congratulationâheâd say what I more or less just saidâthat growing up heâd always been away that to always be in nature is to be made aware, if youâre not already, of the equation between nature and time, the measure of change, and in this case, the inexorable arc from birth, as things chip away at you little by little, to death. He said he was always aware of nature. And stress that he had always been contemptuous of the multiple Jesus-saves signs in town that suggested you could avoid your fate. How could you not be aware that youâre part of the nature all around too? heâd always said. What was happening as he lay dying on his hospital bed was that he was only continuing to put into practice an attitude that was familiar to him, and his own, as far back as he could recall. Though he probably didnât think of it this way, Jamie was my teacher nowâthe last of the three teachers that have given me whateverâs important in my life.
My teacher Jamie. I didnât or donât just love him, you knowâI respected him as my teacher. I honored him that way. This book is a tribute to him for what he taught me. How many teachers are you given during your lifetime? Jamie probably didnât think of what he was doing as teachingâbut it was, just the same. This teaching was a freely given gift.
He became a prey to death and perished–just as I will. I can really say that I still love him. And if what you fall to after death has nothing to do with selves, because you are now, the both of you, nondiscriminating mindâwhat I said about love remains, only not discriminated from this or thatâbut just what it is.
this remains just the same, what I just said. And now that Iâm the prey lifted by the raptor flying overhead to be torn apart and myself become what Jamie didâdo you think whatever abilityâif anyâI might have developed to come to terms with the death that wonât be long in coming to beâdonât you think whatever strengths I might have in this way owe far more to Jamie than whatever I taught him did for him during our life together and at his own end? and time is disappearance, loss of existenceâfor any beingâincluding. Was it the same imprint of nature that only a sense of things that had been with him throughout life. His acceptance of death was the result of the same imprint that brought him an almost zen-like acceptance now as it had earlier: being part of the swaying pines, that one day will tumble, the toxic and slithery desert creatures as much as the more florid but innocuous desert beingsâthe birds and spring flowers of exquisite coloring that, like us ourselves, would themselves exist only a moment in time before pitching downward to their black end. There in the desert life and death always seemed so intertwined, twins, two sides of the same coin for himâand why in the hospital now, dying of lung cancer, he thoughtâshould it be different for me? The boundary that at least affectively and probably intellectually seems to separate us humans from the rest of lifeâthat boundry-line was eroded, worn away with constant experience, and in the end had, to take him at his word then as we walked in the hospital, formed his vision of his own death, his ending, into something less thanâor maybe I should say more thanâsomething either strange or unrelated to the rest of the world of frightening. It would turn out to be what carried him through at the end as it had in all the other demanding or excruciating experiences of his life. ones whoâd seem bewildered at his acceptance, calm, lack of any apparent fear. When he was in his dying, people used to ask how he could be so accepting of this– deathâand that was the answer he gave. Will I be like Jamie when it comes my time to goâand I hope be with himâŚ? An open question..
f, I think nature mysticismâs just love. In its many forms. Is that why itâs been an important metaphor for most all religions, spiritualties and such? Well if so, thereâs a question I have to askâthis time to me alone, not to me and him together, a couple, though we still are all the same arenât we? We had this 100% love, committed, totally there and for all time and looking to have it somehow go on beyond thatâbeyond time I mean. And of course love has been the main metaphor for spiritual life in who knows but maybe all religions and spiritualties. Powerful stuff. Could Jamieâs love for me and mine for himâtruly, honestly 100 per centâhave been as much the mainstay of his ability to accept his own death completely cheerfully, as much as, say, nature mysticismâand are the two different? If you sit someplace in natureâtake the desert for instanceâlong enough my hunch is itâll get to be throbbing with love, searing love, but love, beautiful love. Then itâs mysticism. Mysticism isnât just people in their monk and nun clothes sitting, like in Zen, on a pillow all day. A tree with many branches.
Natureâs such a large category, literally, you have to learn to stop saying this and that, or here and there andâlucky you!âme and not-me. Freudians think mysticism is just âprimary narcissismâ meaning it replicates and returns you to that stateâthe state of the womb. Maybeâbut not literally. Itâs hard to keep poetry out of mysticism, it just naturally belongs when everything is always turning into something else, or everything else in fact. Han Solo into Princess Leia and back again. How do we know a superstition (so-called) isnât mysticism too, I mean like: just another branch of it? Even though people for some reason always consider the famous mysticisms (St. John of the Cross, my teacher Nissan, his teacher Suzuki-Rosh, Rumi, Hacking) to somehow be âaboveâ plain old insights that come and go in people that when their power goes, or is lost, people dismiss then as just superstition. And finally how do we know my mysticism is the same as yours. How many times does someone have to yell that in your ear before you listen: there is no ranking, no hierarchies, nothingâs better than something else. Is nature mysticism ever different, in terms of some map-making you might want to do, a taxonomyâfrom love? Just love?
Think about it. Two examples were given to me recently. Ms. X is one. Flying from here (San Francisco) to there (San Diego) to see the family she looks out the windowâonly to see the most beautiful veil of mist and gold, the gold shining thru all the little drops to unify you would think but no, with a message: to tell her her father is dying, right now. Sheâs startled. Next about to land the plane descends more moreâall this greenâwithout limits she wonders? The plane lands and she sees her family. Her father has just died. When? The time she was looking out the window at the shining light mist.
One other one, and thatâll be it for now. My friend Y is in Paris and wants to see cemeteries. Either he doesnât want to do Pere Lachaise or heâs already done it: I forget which. By the way, what exactly is the name of that other, not-Pere-Lachaise Paris cemetery? Who cares. Iâm going to move on in the story. He comes to Baudelaireâs grave in this other non-Pere-Lachaise cemetery. What chagrin boils up inside my friend. Because guess what. They buried Franceâs greatest poet between his mother-in-law Mrs. Aupic and her proto-fascist asshole husband General Aupic (As in âMon Generalâ to you) on the othersideâand there he is Baudelaire, sandwiched inbetween the two. My friendâs sense of outrage is almost matched by my own as I watch his face go pale with anger and I start getting all discombobulated too: THIS is how you treat Franceâs greatest poet of all (maybe I mean just maybe: excluding Rimbaud)? But all this is only the preliminaries for the illustration of mysticism or superstition, whatever you want to call it, which is to come.
What happens next is this. Looking up at this hideous wedding cake made of three stacked dead peopleâtwo non-entities or worse, sandwiching our own Charles Baudelaire between them in the set-piece grave monument, lo, raising his eyes whatâs this? thinks my friend. How come? Well because right at that moment this ominous looking black bird of some kind or other, a big crow or something, waddles over right in front of him and looks at him directly in the eyes andâdrops dead. Yup. On the spot. Coincidence? Or message from heaven? An O-M-E-N! A genuine omen of something unknown yet to come, ladies and gentlemen. And to come to my friend. Heâs freaked. Wouldnât you be? My friend says he knows this is an omen or prognostication. And as my friend, with a friend of his own in two beside him, starts to walk out of the cemetery guess what. A very evil-looking black cat watches them feet planted on the ground and standing stark stillâbut with its EYES, yes its EYES follow carefully each step as our friend begins to wend his way to the cemetery exit. Wouldnât you freak too?
Omen? Prognostication? Who could possibly think that vulgar superstition, much less the higher forms of spirituality like enlightenment, could literally be understood as world-connecting events. Affect kickstarts thinking: thereâs no reason to think, or reason, or even rationale if no interest, such as an affect, compels it. My friend is highly intelligentâa bright intellectual. Is it possible to rule out his âintuitionâ that these two events occurring in quick succession were intended as messages from another or other worlds, or from the future or past to our era. Why would he take this seriously? Not reason but affect will start of chain of mental argumentation that later will seem quite reasonable. Orânot seemâbut actually beâreflections of a reality that ordinarily doesnât reach us. Unlike other eras, like the Roman, as represented by the brightest such as Cicero or much earlier Heraklitus, the educated and intelligent of our era deny what they believe are really messages and continue to distance themselves from lines of thinking that are stamped as superstitious.
What moves me to write this blog? I like to tell myself that it will be seen as something like a new genre blurring the diaristic with the philosophic, and soteriological as well. In fact the writing of my blog provides me with something like solace, helps comfort me in the face of the event that has, since April 8, 1008, appeared to me as by far the most important event of my lifeâand that event, as Iâm sure youâll have guessed, is the death of my long-time lover and mate. Though as I say I like to THINK Iâm writing this blog primarily as a contribution toâwhat? writing? the understanding of the role of affect or emotion as compelling what we, disingenuously, continue to think of as Cartesian or dualistic though, considered as if it were autonomous.
Put it another way. Itâs not the cortex that gets the amygdala and hippocampus going but the converse: the two glands, part of the lymph system, generate neural transactions that, through exchange of chemicals at the end of the finger-ish extensions are the sparks that set off message transmission from one neuron to anotherâthroughout billions of billions of themâthe neurons.
Back to my friend. He still seems, in our conversation at the Modern Museum here in San Francisco, to be both fearful somehow in discussing all this, as well as a bit confused, or distracted. I would be the same, Iâm sure.
And Julius Caesar? What about him? And why are superstition in latin, âsuperstition,â and ecstasy, exstatio, so closely connected in their etymology. Would the affect content of âsuperstitionâ pushed far enough, or somehow made important enoughâas for instance is was for me in my novitiate days when receiving communionâsomehow act as a transponder sending âbackâ to some other place, or to the same place considered from other viewpoints, be a primary way of the micro-systems or macrosystems âtalkingâ to each other. In superstition and in the much âhigherâ non-rationalities that emotion or affect don as a mask in order to accomplish certain tasks, like communicationâdoes the universe, as Philip K. Dick (or Heraklitus) thought, become simply a set of sentences, a vast conversation?
Going to bed a few nights ago I once again looked at one of my favorite pictures of Jamie and, inevitably, broke into tears. Here is a response that instead of being celebrated as one of the most important, as a key intensity in emotion, of all human means of communication to human or non-humanâis instead downplayed as the weakness of a man who, after the death one and a half years earlier, of a partnerâhas not yet learned to âcontrolâ his emotions about this event. In fact of all the ways of trying to summon a sense of the presence of my friend and mate, of all these, crying or weeping hysterically, seems to be the most effective of all in being able to make him much more present than a hologram could do. So I cry for Jamie. And, not literally but just as really in terms of how my mind âperceivesâ his presence.
Something happens very early in the west. Despite warnings of three different kinds according to the historian Suetoniusâincluding the dream-warning of his wife CalpurniaâCaesar dismisses these as superstitions instead of as sources of information and goes to his fate in the Senate.
Today we listen to our superstitionsâwhen we doâclandestinely, shamefully, secretively. A change has occurred. Before modernism who wouldnât believe in the touch of the king as a means of curing a disease? Earlier still, even Cicero and Octavian, seeing some ominous bird like a large crow grew fearfulâthat is, in effect recognized the reality quotient accessed by this prodigyâand so took steps to avoid whatever presumable disaster awaited them. We repress out superstitions far deeper into the unconscious. We eat meet and yet are ashamed to deny that this horrifies us. Hence the import of a new coinage in the last century: the slaughter-house, rich in purple tones of murder, is effaced and in its place we construct newânot buildings or techniquesâbut vocables: what formerly was called by the name slaughterhouse has become the bland, sanitary thing called a meat-packing plant.
Odd, isnât it? Hulot, author of La mystique sauvage (Iâd like to translate the word sauvage as natural or original or primary, in terms of the mysticism of which M. Hulot sees a subset of the general notion called mysticism (la mystique). The book shows essentially the primacy of affective over ârational.â Rational, rationalize. You can think of the varieties of mystical experienceâin which I include without distinction the high mysticism of Meister Eckhart and throwing salt over your shoulder, a âsuperstitionââas simply intensifications of a cosmic conversation going on all along, but with greater or lesser acknowledgement of this by the single human cerebellum. Or at other ordersâcommunications of the future universe with the past (note the new theory that there are circle-like traces of a universe or universes before the Big Bang in our own universe of a previous universe, singular, or singular universes, plural. Not to speak of many other possibilitiesâthe possibility of many universes far outside ours and so on. And if there is any connection it is certainly not on a rational plane. Just as the continuity in a single being still in the womb experiences no distinction that would separate it from a hypothetical non-it, we can say the same of other universesâbeyond the reach of science.
Leading us elsewhere.
*
Omens were a core experience for Romans–so is it so strange my vacation with Jamie to Rome should have some remnants of this too? Hint: first thereâs a bridge experience Iâm going to tell you about, then thereâs the umbrella trees stuff you have yet to know about.
Example. Recalcitrant Caesar whoâs been given warning omens, about the dangers of the next day in the Senate, if he decided to go despite the warning. What this illustrates as youâll soon see: that their sense of what superstitious means is a bit or even a whole lot different from ours. Theirs was a message from the beyond and the trick with the beyond wasâit was dicey, and the square pegs (messages to us) they were trying to fit into round holes in the integument separating out two worlds, theirs and ours, was so dicey as to be probably deforming or at least, as in the Delphi oracle, ambiguous in the extreme. Round holes should match square pegs, no?.
When the integument separating our two worlds, like at solstice time, thins, your omenâs going to be more, not less likely to make sense, be legible, have a real bearing on your life: the forces of beyond have obviously found certain ways to FORCE square pegs into round holes, huh? Butâand here I almost throw up my hands in frustration if not capitulationâarenât mistakes, yes you heard that right, I said mistakesâarenât they just..whatâs the right wordâRIFE in the realm of spiritology (thatâs not a word but Iâm making it one because it just makes sense to me). But spirit messages are always and by definition affect messages, not rational ones, and as such liable to a great deal of screwy-ness, getting things a bit âoffâ you might say. But hey! the following is important: the more important the information, the more likely too it is to be a little âoff,â or screwed up or deformedâyou name it. Hey hey hey: the heart has its reasons doesnât it not that reason knows not. (OK I canât help but show off a little here, though 3/4 of normally educated people also can quote this: le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait pas. I used to think that instead of the word pas, not, he, Pascal I mean, should have written the word plus. So the so-called original Pascal sentence would read, The heart has its reasons that reason knows not where as the UR or primal sentence there originally but changed by puzzled editors probably meant that originally reason used to be able to make use of some of the paranormal and mystical and intuitive powers that now only the heart knows. Would that have been a much more acceptable state of affairs? In other words in the beginning the lymphic system and the cerebellum were one thing, leaning one way at one end (brain stem and glands) and the other way at the other (the brain coreâbut alas readers thatâs only speculative and Iâm the first to acknowledge this).
Well-bred and educated (=rich) Romans thought they were way way above any superstitions. Period. But as I would have said to them: define superstition. And I would ask them this: you think the discovery of a three-headed calf signals clearly some great but still coming event. And, Romans, I will give you this. Third millennium people (us) believe ourselves to be superstition-free but this clearly is rationalization. Mother says âOh honey Iâm calling to tell you NOT to take that flight out of Logan, or JFK or whatever, because I have this really strong sense youâll regret it: itâll crash.â So in respect to momâs intuitions (and your own by the way) you donât get on that plane. But guess what. The plane, in 99 times out of 100 DOESNâT crash. This doesnât mean her intuition was worthless but just that, as at Delphi, you have to know how to interpretâthe oracle, momâs intuitions, your own. Whatever. And all of the above paragraph is only about the BAD sense of superstition but clearly Iâm trying to make a case that thereâs a GOOD one thatâs at least as important if not more.
If there is why donât we recognize this? Intellectuals used to after all. Cicero for instance. Read the letters. Or all the Roman people. There was an eagle over the Capitolium that they saw first proudly sited at the top of the roof and then begin to wobbleâand most horrible of allâthen fell. Obviously âeagleâ = fate of Roman republic. And if it falls, you are in deep dodo, as Pres. Bush the first used to say. But if you are a normal intellectual today and therefore if not a Buddhist at least someone who just assumes, hardly even thinking about it, that all things are connected. If this is true, it also was true. Hence the crowd that gasped as the eagle above the capitolium started to fall down dead were right after all werenât they? Maybe not if they thought if meant the Roman res publica was in trouble but in some yet-to-be-determined way, right?
Right. Superstition, as concept, is rich in its spectra of meanings. That we can now agree on. Canât we? Because Iâm taking it for granted youâre fucked up if you donât agree with that. And you donât understand the underlying interconnection of the world. And lest that sound too sectarianly Buddhist, think about it: Chinaâs industrial waste in wind-form drifts slowly over to the US of A and dumps its load. Oh but you know all this already, almost all of you Iâm sure. We âco-produceâ each other. As sentient beings. Or as anything that exists in the universe even just once of those tiny micro-particles that they produce only in labs and come into existence from nothing and then are gone in a nano-nano-nano-second. Do you call THAT superstition? You should or you wonât understand anything.
Now if someone if youâre offended, I say talk turkey. If you put it nicely and with reasonable clarity to readers and they donât want to make the effort to understand, then kick their frickin asses! Thatâs a thing of last resort of course. But nothing can be 100% ruled out canât it? Even kicking readerly asses? Why do you think in the zen tradition for hundreds of years the master would walk around with a big stick and whack! you painfully hard, on your shoulders, if for instance you were dozing off instead of making the effort to concentrate yourself in single-pointed attention. So, if you think thereâs danger of readers getting even a LEETLE bit lazy during important teaching, kick their freakin asses. I say this as a writer of course. Since in real life as you know Iâd never dream of attempting such violent action. But in writingâYES! .
Superstition.Can we just look at the word, the word itself I mean this time, just for a minute or two?
Superstition, in latin, âsuperstitioâ, or âI stand above.â (related to Greek âstoâ I stand). OK. Butâamazing!âthereâs also a latin word for trance, exstatis, meaning âI am outside myselfâ or âI am beside myself.â In other words crazy or mystical. They didnât always distinguish. (You know those babes the Pythias? According to our world-traveler Pausanias they were chosen in part because of not being very bright bulbsâŚ.Think about it.) So both words have âI standâ in them. But one has âabove myselfâ while the other has outside or beside myself. Is there only chance? Or does etymology provide a clue? Can even the superstition (such as just above everything in non-Roman or foreign religions) that Romans put down, as opposed to the kind they actually practiced (that eagle falling off the capitolium would have appalled even, no especially, intellectuals like Cicero, or Seneca, or whoever)âno, wait. Change that. Not âCan evenâŚâ but âDid evenâ not just the people but the high intellectuals see a relation existing between bad superstition, like say the religion of stupid Scythiansâboy oh boy are they stupid barbarians and SO unlike us cultivated Greek-like Romans!âand the kind of possession (being out of your mind, beside yourself, alongside yourself, in other words in a mystical trance, like Socrates was when he stopped along the road back to Athens and stayed standing stock-still all night while his students went back to their comfy upper-class bedsâwhile Socrates was undoubtedly doing some very high class thought-non/thought that was WAY beyond his students. Whatâs the point? Let me repeat it, students. The Dao te Ching says it best: The way that can be said is not the way. You cannot reach any high level of truth or better, you cannot reach truth, period, through concepts. Hence the apparent etymological praise of crazy people and superstition even in the bad sense Iâve just cited.
Superstition is just possession, as is all mysticism. Let me unfold that for you. There exists a membrane line-of-demarcation between the two worlds, our world of discontinuities and the other one which is continuousâand so might appear as emptiness or even nothingness, though looking at the word carefully you can see that this is not so. At certain times like solstice the membrane thins and permits easier penetration from one side to the other. But I call it possession because it always starts from the gods or daemons, in other words, from the other and continuous world, which is actually just the flip side of our discontinuous worldâthough what is in question in both cases is the same, the same simply looked at from two differing points of view. Got that? But remember square pegs, round holes? Also distance or non-distance. Things can get mucked up, that is deformed on their way from the divine world to the human one, from the other world to our world. (Just strike divine if you donât like the word, call it the invisible world, the spirit world, the world of emptiness, or world of nothingness and youâll still be on track and we can continue to walk together on this, ok?).
A manâs stupid wife (Calpurnia is stupid for the Romans only because following the thought of the Greeks all women are stupid) gives you this hysterical warning, Caesar, honey, oh please donât go to the Senate house today or youâll be murdered! You smile condescendingly: women! canât live with âem, canât live without âem! and throw up your hands). This obviously lower-class (and hence also stupid) human being by the side of the road to the Senate hands you a message, according to Suetonius at least, that gives you the same warning. Ignore it. The common people are ignorant and stupid. So he ignores it. We know what happened. âYou too, my child?!â bleats Caesar to Brutus (thatâs Suetonius, I donât know where in the world Shakespeare got it wrong so it now says Et tu, Brute, and you as well Brutus? Mistakes happen.
Omens counted back thenâwhy not now?
I mean if at least you live in a big city or along one of the two coasts youâll probably understand at least that throughout most of history omens have counted. (Mrs. Reagan in the White House consulted that astrologer, whatâs her nameâand Mrs. Reason isnât much more of an intellectual than her husband, Doofus). If you can take omens seriously though not vulgarly, not the way they might first appear to you, knowing you will have to work on an omen with at least the energy it takes to work on a koan, then youâre half-way home. You recognize a) there is another world and b) it can and does communicate with us under certain conditions (the separation layer thinning at the solstices). And c) in terms of communication, the other world does communicate without, only not necessarily, as the example of Caesar shows, in the ways that you expect. There is a reasonable expectation that Jacob will have to wrestle with angles. That enigmas like oracles and such will have to be figured out and transcribed. Etc.
As I already told you when Jamie first read the Dao te Ching that Iâd given him, he exclaimed with joyâwhy donât they teach this in the schools, this is real!
I personally happen to think that the meaning itself, of omens, can change. They might mean one thing at one time or place and another at another and so on. Why not? Especially given transiency or impermanence. Things are always changing. Jamieâs dad had taught him that when the scat in the path lies in this configuration it meant the mountain lion went that-a-way. But once Jamie delayed too long. No, his daddy told him, it means it went THAT-a-way, meaning 180 degrees opposite. How could that little amount of time have made that difference? Things are always changing. The Romans recognized that. Two very important books are called Metamorphoses. One is the tale of a man turned into a donkey but saved at the end by Isisâand in gratitude becomes her monk. Thatâs the later one. The earlier one is Ovid, interesting connections being made that were never made before between and among the various mythic stories that his poetry tells us about. Does the word metamorphosis, change of form, literally, mean the same in both books? In one it means a man becomes a donkey who becomes a man again. Kind of simple of a meaning. In the other it means there are some very sophisticated connections being made between and, as I say, among, myths that never were made before. All this presupposes things are changing in language and writing too. I have one meaning that I think people will get from this blog or book and yet when it gets out there published people I will be appalled at what reviewers say this means. And if I could look through the window like Tom Sawyer at my dead self, when Iâm dead, and the book this dead self wroteâI will go berserk. Change. Transiency. This world is always changing. The other one remains the same void it has never begun being and will never end being but still is, all the same.
Heraklitus! you who said that a person does not step into the same river twice. Thatâs change or impermanence. But who also said at what most scholars figure is the beginning of this book put together from fragments of it found (âapudâ) from among a whole bunch of other booksâwho also began his book in praise of the logos which is define as conversation. The world is structured as a set of conversations, as language going back and forth among a group of people (all the people that were or are or will be)âand that is interconnection. This can get you off-base because at first glance but first glance only, you might be disturbed by the passing thought thatâarenât impermanence and interconnection necessarily self-contradictory phenomena? Think a little. They are not. For what goes out of existence or is not yet in existence also helps co-produce what happens now to be in existence. Just thinkâŚ.Think. This is true, but hard and you will have to squint your eyes and frown a lot trying to get why. Look hard and you will see that Heraklitus was a Buddhist. For sure. Hella buddhist. No shit.
Now Iâm not saying I understood this at Romeâbut in the bridge experience I came close anywayâbut from a) impermanence and b) interconnection you will see that you canât cling to things. You canât flee them eitherâbut thatâs another story. The main thing is you canât cling, obsess, let them rule you instead of the other way around.
So the other part of the reasons Jamieâs dad took Jamie out with him on those encampments in the desert was to firm him up (first, itâs scary there especially at night when big cats can come right past your sleeping bad, second there are often demands of heat of cold to overcome etc.: in other words get used to handling anything, boy). No more than Socrates, faced with the imminent arrival of the man carrying the cup of hemlock, could try to make progress on his musical education yet stay ever calm, tranquil and even funny, of mind. Part of going to Rome for me was to try to accustom myself to sudden changes of difference. And when the old intrudes upon the new, not to be frightened. This succeeded partly insofar for instance as after the rest of the group had gone from the bottom-most church to one of the two piled on two of it (I think this is the S. Francesco church if I recall rightly), I was having a lovely conversation with a woman who died two millennia ago but whose beautifully polished black hard stone (of some kind or other) tomb with its epigraphical inscription remained exactly, or so it seemed, as it had been, as if patiently waiting out the 2,000 years just for me. And given interconnection againâwhy shouldnât that be the case? Unbeknownst to her family and to the authorities they were, without realizing it, only following the Other Worldâs instructions, so that finally after 20 or so centuries she and I could converse together in sometimes funny ways, sometimes serious and so on. Why not? Could the situation not be as just now described to you? Think. And thanks for thinking. It means a lot to me. To think you really are thinking about what I am saying.
*
In the desert Jamie notices things: maybe like Heraklitus and Hesiod did. They are the three models of my life. After that, only Socrates. After that, shit. I feel my life drifting up in smoke just like the zen found did when he found his vocation. Dogenâs mother had died when he was young, something like seven or eight maybe. At the ceremony with the cremated ashes in the wrapped vase on the altar he noticed that the smoke from the two incense sticks arose in a column (the opposite way from Vesuvius, which was going up at first, true, but then coming downâand so less spiritually) that like the top of the umbrella pine that Pliny compared the Vesuvius column to, it began to spread out but instead of inflicting devastation the twin incense columns that were guarding and honoring his motherâs ashesâthey just went up and spread out and dispersed more and more until they were the nothing that they, and she, had come from. That all of us come from. Then and there, Dogen decided to become a monk. This is the only thing worth doingâconfronting birth and death and how things appear out of nothing and go back to the same nothing. What else is there worth doing, he thought?
Until you are enlightened your mind will always be fragmented, just as mine is. And that too dictates this formâthe form of fragmentation I am using to write this writing. It is because I am less than enlightened and cannot do otherwise. You must put up with me and bear with this or if there is anything worthwhile in this writing, it will never reach you. You must not cling to fragmentation but as it overtakes you from time to time you must not fearfully try to flee from it either. Between the two is the tranquility of mind that is or should be our aim. IF we have any sense.
So should you be frightened or scandalized if I tell you again and again I really believed Jamie and still believe him when he said (still says): Bruce when you are dead too, I will come and find you, even if I have to sniff you out. I really loved that way of putting it. His closeness to animals and mountains and desert all came out in that figure, the olfactory oneâifâŚ.then I will sniff you out. It was as if he was so close to nature that just as the sense of smell is comparatively dominant there but no longer with us people, he had sensibly enough somewhere along the line thrown off his humanity for something much bigger, much larger, which the desert represents. The hugeness of that void where shadowy wet figures, dark and abandoned, seem to come to and fro to represent just the fact of the reality of the non-visible even among humans.
Jamie loved my smell. Heâd say, I could smell you out anywhere, darlinâ, even in a huge crowd of hundreds of thousands of people. Just like mountain lions and snakes do: all their movies are conditioned by their most perfect sense which is smell. This equates to the fact that anything mental begins in the body, that the intellectual is built upon the emotional, that the cerebrum is grounded on and hippocampus and other more far-sighted glands without whichâor without an INTEREST of some kindâthe process of thinking could never, never get going. Thinking can never arise by itself. The smell of the ugly-smelling greasewood bush in the desert must set it off. Or the incredibly unbelievable freshness of the desert after a spring rain. Oh! if you had been there when Jamie and his mom standing beside me on the front porch after the rain the previous night we first inhaledâand always feel in dizziness, in ecstasy, in trace from the single-pointed concentration of this childlike and innocent freshness. We gaspedâalmost in painâfrom this.
Omens are important and necessary because of this. All omens are physical. And that is where we always startâand finish. Do not rely on the otherâthough use it. Dogen: the enlightenment IS the bodily position (the correct position you take to do zazen). You cannot be more physical than that. That is why the pope condemned zazen. He realized its truth. Omens share in this. If you reject omens and prodigies you are rejecting the beginning of the truth in the physical. You would be in delusion because you would be postulating a dualism, that there is on one hand mind, the other body. That is so dumb. It is so incredibly dumb.
An omen is a theophany. Yahweh appears in a burning bush. If you are frightened of black cats you are closer to the truth than philosophers are. Donât say truth. Itâs reality. Truth is a representation of reality. If it is.
when even before he knew he was dying he would tell me that when I That is where Jamie is now, dispersed into just emptiness and I will never see or reach him again. that everything changes. Mountains crumble. Sheep die of mange of something or else just get old and die or are killed for their meat: and what a change THAT is! Plantsâthe same. I could go on. But I assume youâre not stupid and have gotten the point. To really get the point is to get it affectively though, not intellectually. So being out in the desert, for Jamie, and doing zazen, for me, turn out to create this kind of identity bond where he both realize in the marrow of our bones that weâre (always) slipping away and turning into something else that at some point you have to say ISNâT ME any more. We had that in common. Ooops, almost said HAVE, present tense. But as Iâve saidâIâm still grieving, you dopes. (Hey youâre not really dopes but Iâm joking to try to put across an important point and maybe itâs even the most important of all. So donât get offended please. Thank you.)
Superstition is a kind of knowledge that is a subset of affect, not knowledge. For all intents and purposes as far as I can see knowledge is useless for any of the wonderful things about human life. Example. Yesterday (itâs fall now) walking down 18th St. I came upon two âwhat can I call them but theophanies? Well whatever. The first was this sycamore (or plane try if you prefer) the beauty of whose reds russets golds browns and so on stopped me, with real tears, right in my tracks. If I was an animal being hunted by Jamieâs dad in the desert, I would have been a goner: because I just stood there for literally a couple of minutes looking, amazed at the wonder of this worldâs particular phenomenon I was encountering. Is that epistemological knowledge or affectâor you might say esthetic knowledge, instead? You decide.
Does this apply to omens? You bet. Omens convey âknowledgeâ thru affect and not thru intellection. Things start at the brain stem, then go to the hippocampus and/or amygdala and besides constructing space and time also produce emotion, feeling, affect, whatever you call it.
And it doesnât use logic, emotion I mean.
For instance it makes plenty of sense just not logical sense that during that hailstorm? the one with me and Jamie sitting and swinging together on the porch swing and watching it in the desert?âthat we should feel incredibly close to each otherâand that linked to this affect-knowledge should be a sensuality that in the mere holding of each otherâs hands we got a little hard, I noticed. You knowâwe got woodies. See? Doesnât that all make sense now?
Also please to remember my swimming pool experience, at my grandmotherâs. Me being only three or four and the nympth-like voices of the deep end inviting me to walk down over my head and drown myself because Iâd then be in such a groovy world. But that first Iâd have to live my life and then toward the end theyâd come to call to me again.
All this is theory, about omens, to prepare you for Rome.
And Rome will involve oceanic feelings as Freud called them, mysticism through even superstition, I guess. To illustrate this mysticism, Iâve placed, below, a picture

from his (soi-disant) âWhite Trash Series.â I, maybe, by proxy get a pass to use the first two words, just as Jamie certainly did. But youâno.