Saturday, November 20, 2010

Goodnight, Awakening

A couple of months back, my dear friend Jon White sidled up to me at a favorite burrito joint and casually said, "Hey, I'd love to design a website for you if you'd ever be interested in something like that".
I probably went a bit pale as I considered the import of his words.  I'm sure  I swayed in my seat as the blood stopped flowing to my head.
Having Jon offer to design and build a website for you would be roughly analogous to the the Pope asking to pray for you, or Johnny Cash offering to sing at your birthday party, or Phyllis Tickle writing an unrequested endorsement of your unpublished manuscript.  Jon is a stone-cold professional, a creative genius, a mind-blowingly fast keyboard operator, and a flattering muse.  Moreover, the code he creates is inspiring to any writer, since he staunchly refuses to waste a single keystroke.  I didn't exactly feel like I was in need of a website, but if Jon thought I should have one, then I was going to run straight home and grab the domain (though he helped me with that, too).
I was breathing the rarefied air of good fortune, and I knew it.  So when I sat down with him in my kitchen for a meeting in which he actually asked me for my thoughts on the website, my mouth went dry.  When he took visual and verbal notes in his sketchbook, I started to stutter.  But when he let me know that he'd had an inspiring design concept in mind all along, I realized that I was poised on a launching pad like a Saturn V rocket.
Having someone who knows you and truly likes you design a custom web interface for you is at once humbling and deeply affirming.  And when that someone is the brilliant and passionate and talented Jon White, it might just change your life.  I'm ever grateful.

*    *    *    *    *   *  
Rest assured, everything here is already over there, and is slowly being properly tagged: MikeStavlund.com

Tuesday, November 09, 2010

Emerging from the Fog

As I write this, my daughter is on her very first school field trip.  I just dropped her electrified body off at preschool while she endearingly rattled on and on about the bus ride, and the Nature Center that they will visit, and her repeated assurance that she will keep her knee socks pulled up, since that is what will keep her legs warm while she's wearing her new long skirt.  To say that she is excited would be a massive understatement.

Debriefing from school yesterday, she revealed the purpose of the trip (beyond the obviously enthralling ride on the bus):  "We're going to listen to a lady talk about the Indians who used to live at the Nature Center," she said.  "Indians lived in this land a long time ago, but I don't know where they went..."

Which statement caused me to immediately flash back to my experiences last week at the Emergent Village Theological Conversation in Atlanta.  An event that-- quite frankly, and I'm not proud to say-- I was not thrilled about attending, but did so primarily because of the opportunity to connect with so many faraway friends and partners in my exploration of the Christian faith.  So I uncharacteristically didn't complete the reading assignments, and in fact didn't bring a whole lot of energy or optimism to the conversation. 

This state of un-readiness and disaffection only served to highlight the transformative effect of those three days, however.  Truly, I doubt I'll ever look at the world in quite the same way again.  And I'll certainly never read the Bible as I did before.

The theological conversation was a lot of things, but I think it was an experience best described as what it was not.  Because so many issues were addressed that raise so many hackles, it was challenging to slow down and not jump to conclusions.  And as I return to my regular life and attempt to describe the conversation to others, I'm even more aware of all of the potential pitfalls and polarities that lie right under the surface.  So, my hope that there is hope in a via negativa.  So what wasn't the Emergent Theological Conversation on post-colonial theology?

It wasn't about guilt.  Yes, there was plenty of room for feeling guilty.  For even a brief and barely objective survey of the recent history of North America will reveal unspeakable atrocities like genocide, germ warfare, deceit, theft, internment, slavery, subjugation, and cultural annihilation.  But even as the wave of recognition that these many injustices were not just a part of someone else's faraway experience, but happened here in what we pejoratively call 'the land of the free', we were not encouraged to feel guilty. 

It wasn't about reparations.  Though the aforementioned imperial behaviors provided financial and resource benefits to the Europeans who perpetrated them, and to the many other people who have immigrated ever since, there was no talk of compensation for these crimes. 

It wasn't about confession.  Though the indigenous peoples of America have long been considered a 'mission field' by a self-perceived 'Christian nation', and though that ostensible 'mission' has not in 400 years brought to such fruition that a native person has been granted a position of religious authority, there was never any suggestion that we do some personal or communal confession of sins in this regard.  Nor was there any apparent desire for an apology-- indeed, it was obvious that apologies are too often token, insincere, shallow, and undertaken only to assuage some sense of guilt. 

It wasn't about pragmatism.
  Among the largely Euro-American audience, there was an unspoken and yet massive impulse toward some kind of solution.  "So what should we do, then?" was the question on the tip of everyone's tongue, but which no one asked because I think we all sensed that to do so would be premature and unproductive.  So we quietly hoped that the leaders of this theological conversation would give us some practical steps forward before we concluded our time together.  But as the end of the conversation came, it became obvious that there are no easy answers, no solutions, no repairs that are simple (and probably none that are complex).

And yet in spite of all of the weight of what's above, It wasn't about despair.  The theologians who were our honored guests had every right to be angry and embittered (and I think the rest of us would have enjoyed the catharsis of a pointed reproach), but they were instead gracious and kind and patient.  So that our time together was even-- and quite unexpectedly-- hopeful.    We departed as friends and co-laborers. 


All of this was on my mind when I stopped to consider what to say to my daughter about her new knowledge that there were people here before people like us came from Europe.  She doesn't need the whole gory story, of course, and I certainly didn't share that with her.  But I did take the time to let her know that Indians didn't just live at the Nature Center-- they lived on the land where our house sits, and they played at the top of the hill where the park is, and they enjoyed the stream that we walk by on most days.  I told her that they didn't leave, exactly, but that there are native peoples who still live here.

I said these things because I think I now understand why post-colonial theologians do their work and expend themselves and subject themselves to misunderstanding and malignment.  I said them because, once I suppress my can-do, fix-it Euro-American impulses, I can finally see a clear goal. 

We talk about these difficult and thorny topics not for the sake of blame or guilt or compensation or despair,  but to come to this simple recognition:  It Happened.   

It Happened. And we cannot undo that fact or reduce it's impact or import.  But maybe we'll find a bit of peace when we tell the truth, and sit with it.  Maybe we'll finally learn from the people who we've oppressed when we soberly recognize what's been done to them.  Maybe we can build some friendships when we realize how broken we've all been by our history.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Indiana

though at the end of the drive
the baby screamed in the back seat
until her parent's ears grew callouses,
when she found the arms
of her great, great aunt
she rested like a doll
eyes wide open,
cheeks dimpled with a grin
because though they've just met
tiny Mira understands
deep in her bones
that Aunt Liz is magic

Saturday, October 23, 2010

O Hi O

in Ohio
the rest areas
have no less than five
charcoal grills
places where people
with a greater sense of 'rest'
than I posess
bring coal and meat
slow flame and cool drink
for a quick bite to eat

so I take the hint
forget the trip
run up the hill
soak in the sunset
play on the leaves
with my girls
who deliver samples
of autumnal radiance
to their mother
who celebrates
with theatrical delight

Friday, October 22, 2010

Pittsburgh

For my friends at Formation House.

hills around
unfiltered sunlight
casting long shadows
a handful of birds
make their way
across the sky
pressing heavy wings
into the morning air
not yet in synced formation
yet unmistakably together
preparing the way
for the flock
on the horizon

Monday, October 18, 2010

Inventive Church

I'm grateful to the fine folks at Emergent Village for posting a piece I wrote recently, and to the fine folks at Common Table for giving me so much to write about.  Oh, and Doug's book isn't too bad, either.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Competition

It would seem that The Hardest Question is a hard habit to break.  Though our church is setting the Lectionary aside this week, I can't help but look at the passages and try to see the thread that runs through them.  Which raises the question of why Rev. Russell has passed by the very passage that gives mandate to the very website he curates?  Curious, indeed. 

Genesis 32:22-31

The same night Jacob got up and took his two wives, his two maids, and his eleven children, and crossed the ford of the Jabbok. He took them and sent them across the stream, and likewise everything that he had. Jacob was left alone; and a man wrestled with him until daybreak. When the man saw that he did not prevail against Jacob, he struck him on the hip socket; and Jacob's hip was put out of joint as he wrestled with him. Then he said, "Let me go, for the day is breaking." But Jacob said, "I will not let you go, unless you bless me." So he said to him, "What is your name?" And he said, "Jacob." Then the man said, "You shall no longer be called Jacob, but Israel, for you have striven with God and with humans, and have prevailed." Then Jacob asked him, "Please tell me your name." But he said, "Why is it that you ask my name?" And there he blessed him. So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved." The sun rose upon him as he passed Penuel, limping because of his hip. 

Over the past several years, this has become one of my very favorite passages in the Bible, and a kind of anchor through some stormy parts of my life.   For those who follow in the legacy of the Abrahamic faiths, it offers a license to ask questions, to be honest, and to struggle with our various conceptions of God.  Moreover, it offers a kind of mandate to wrestle with God himself.   There is a wonderful freedom in knowing that it's normal to wrestle and struggle with God, and to in fact know that part of the legacy of Israel is to be a people who will constantly question and  wrestle with God. 

And yet, and yet.  Struggling with God is an exciting adventure, but it is damned exhausting.  One can struggle with God, but you'll be lucky to escape without a limp.  So why this sense of competition, this adversarial stance?  Why this gradual, mysterious, sweaty, prideful, pain-wracked revelation of exactly who Jacob is wrestling with?  We can admire Jacob for his scrappy determination, or we can wonder why he fights all night.  We can wonder why this mysterious man/God/God-man doesn't just give up the good stuff before the dawn.  Why so stingy with the blessing?  Why does Jacob need to go through so much agony-- and suffer such permanent injury-- in order to get his new name and mission? 

Analogies with parenthood are fraught with peril, but I can't help but think about my relationship with my three daughters (I've already been writing about my dead son).  As a parent, I try not to set myself in an adversarial relationship with my kids.  I try not to foster feelings of competition with them.  I try not to lead them to believe that they need to work for my love or my blessing.  Viewing this-- or any-- love relationship as a zero-sum game can only lead to tragic results.  When a newborn is screaming at 2am, the idea that she's opposed to me-- rather than simply uncomfortable-- leads to all kinds of escalating aggravation for us both.  And I'm fearful enough of adolescence that I've already started my reading, where I've learned that a sense of collaboration is even more important then. 

My hardest question:  Much as I love this passage, I wonder why everything needs to be so hard.  Why does our releationship with God need to be so adversarial and agonizing?