Countenance Blog

Minneapolis

I’m certainly glad that the Ilhan Omar matter is being officially pursued.

There’s something about the way it is that bothers me a little bit.

Let me reverse the question so that you understand what I’m thinking:

What if she was not actually yet 18, and what if she wasn’t married to her brother, and what if she wasn’t attached to an atrocity committing regime in Somalia, and what if she always went by her real legal name?

Does this mean that everything would be A-OK?

Our dispossession is fine if all the legalistic Is are dotted and Ts are crossed?

I think a good opportunity to shine the light on the question of the desirability (or rather, lack thereof) of white racial dispossession by means of migration is being lost in the legalistic controversy over one particular Somalian who so migrated (and eventually won election to Congress).

We also have to admit to ourselves that even if she is thrown out of Congress and deported, that district will probably send another one like her, likely another Somalian, but even if it it’s a cuck white, it won’t matter.

Washington, D.C.; Austin; Kiev

Re Trump, Elon, Ukraine, Starlink, the row.

Don’t pay any attention to what Trump and Elon say or don’t say or confirm or deny with their mouths.

Don’t pay attention to anybody’s words.

All you need to is what Elon did. Pay attention to Elon’s actions.

Because his action involved the enforcement of an American foreign and military policy decision.

Which means that Elon’s having done it meant that Trump ordered it.

American foreign and military policy determination and singular actions therein, ultimately go through one individual and one individual only. Remember Truman’s buck with brakes.

And Trump ordered it because Ukraine was getting to be a victim of its own success, i.e. success in drone striking Russian diesel refineries, sending the global price of diesel upwards which in turn is threatening the world economy. Diesel is the elbow grease of the world economy.

Washington, D.C.; Jerusalem

Read the post on Truth where Trump endorses Bibi, and read it closely. Thank you for your close attention to this matter when you slow down at about halfway through.

Bibi Netanyahu has been a Great Warrior Prime Minister, and an even greater Partner for Peace in combatting the Islamic Republic of Iran, with its 51 year old chant, “Death to Israel, Death to America! We will destroy the Little Satan and the Big Satan.” What Country can survive when things such as this are allowed to be said, because eventually, they always end up being true? It would have been only a question of time until Iran would have put that ominous phrase into effect, but they have been systematically destroyed, both Militarily and Financially, and unless they change their ways, rapidly, we will soon finish the job. If Israel has the wrong Leader, which would be anyone other than Bibi, America will have to do this work ourselves, and I am not inclined to do so. Bibi Netanyahu has been Strong, Brave, and Brilliant in the face of tremendous opposition, including that coming from even Israel, itself. Despite all of that, he has endured and, in fact, he has thrived! I have watched Bibi under the most trying of times. Normal men or women in such situations would have wilted under the pressure — But Bibi did not wilt, he actually got stronger, and maintains that same Strength today. This is the kind of Partner that the United States of America is demanding of Israel, a Country for which it has done so much. Please let this Letter serve to represent my Complete and Total Endorsement of Bibi Netanyahu in his upcoming Race for Re-Election as Prime Minister of Israel. BIBI NETANYAHU WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN! Thank you for your attention to this matter.

It also continues to prove me correct in a few chronic assertions I’ve been making.

Durham, England

I don’t see any pure angels here.

The side of officialdom, Prevent and the cops, are much more wrong than she was and is, I think.

But I also don’t think she’s totally in the pure angelic clear.

Because you really do have to look a little sideways at least at non-Jews who are or become just that thrown in to Jewish and Israeli society, culture, religion and whatnot.

Philosemitism, being the fancy word to describe it, and probably a majority of Jewish thinkers are troubled by it. Anyone not of your group who gets too interested with an intimate with your group even in a positive affirmative supportive sense needs to be watched. Many times before now, fanatical positivism has instantly switched to fanatical negativism. The philosemite who loves Jews today could very easily be the same individual who sends Jews to gas chambers tomorrow. It goes back to the dictum that love and hate are the same emotion and indifference is the antonym of both, and how easily people switch between the two at the drop of a hat. Jewish opposition to philosemitism is that it is pathological on some sense that someone who is not Jewish gets too interested in Jews. The sin being the obsession in se, not the direction of the obsession.

This issue could probably be better handled by someone sitting her down and explaining to her the facts of life and that maybe she needs to chill out with this a little bit and touch a little bit of her own grass. Not some finding nails everywhere bureaucratic busybodies siccing the cops on her.

Paris

In case you haven’t already figured out, what this is all about is that French teachers’ unions and their allied and associated politicians, largely LFI and JLM, agitated a bunch of non-white/non-European/non-French students or “students” to riot on behalf of the teachers’ unions pet concerns. Ask yourself: How many teenagers do you know, even “spirited” nons, riot over “student-teacher ratios?” That’s a teacher-y and a union-y concern, not a student-y concern, and especially not a bad-student-y concern. It’s just that they whipped up a Frankenstein which has turned on them and gone way out of control. Good going, helluva job.

And now that the festivities in the Fifth Republic are in full swing, we have way too many people even in our own sector and close to us swinging and missing on what’s going on. I have to read from our kind of sources that this is “an anti-globalist protest against neoliberalsm,” or that this is due to the flailing and shaky French welfare and dole system, or that they’re protesting against the French way of life and democracy.

Look at this pic:

Does this look like a group of people who are ideologically dwelling on anti-globalism and neoliberalsm as if they just read the French translation of the complete works of Robert Welch? Are these people really fretting that some French welfare program will pay several fewer euros a month starting in January? Do they look like they’re specifically protesting against democracy like Curtis Yarvin is the cameraman? And do they look like they really give a rat’s ass about student-teacher ratios?

Nope.

This is an anti-white, anti-French and anti-European race riot, full stop.

It is a bit disconcerting that even as this late hour when more and more people get it, that still plenty of people still can’t make a simple accurate diagnosis. Hear hoofbeats think horses not zebras.

Atlanta

This new Kai Cenat hulabaloo, explained.

It involves a long term profundity and the reality of human nature

To me, I don’t think the he-said-he-said of any of this matters. It almost doesn’t matter what is and is not true and who it affects about any of these allegations.

This is nothing more complicated than the often seen through history and often replicated and will be replicated until the end of days reality, that when human groups and associations become too big, they become unwieldy, and either split into two or a small number, or totally disintegrate. Especially when the things which made the group that big to begin with are economically or socially lucrative, and even more especially when those who are part of the group have big egos.

The Beatles could only stay together for so long, for instance and writ much smaller but just as true nonetheless.

The Reformation split the Hohenzollerns into two, a Franconian/Protestant line and a Swabian/Catholic line. Thankfully, without really any blood spilling consequences, at least not for them.

Edward III (14th c.) is better known today that 80% of today’s Britons are his direct descendants. Closer to his time, and presaging that eventual reality, the War of the Roses (15th c.) was purely a matter of the fact that E3 had so many important, elite and noble direct descendants even then, with so many egos and so much personal gluttony and greed afoot, and before the concept of agnatic primogeniture was legally locked in, that the very extended elite family split into two and went to war with each other.

What’s happening with Kai Cenat now is the same thing. His crew just got too many and too expansive and too full of well-to-do egos and strivers.

“DRIVERS LICENSE”

Yesterday evening, I had to deal with some personal documents.

I bought along the most important ones with me in the move. Unbeknownst to me, and I didn’t discover this until yesterday evening, hidden behind dis-n-dat, I also bought along the first Missouri drivers license I ever got, of course it was punched out and invalidated after renewing it on the day I got my turning 21 yo license.

But I looked at 17 years old version of me. Other than looks, and I’ll admit that the version of me looking back at me was the better version of me in that regard and only that regard, I had to tell him that he doesn’t know even a tenth of what he thinks he knows. God almighty in heaven, I wish I could tell you everything you’re going to have to go through.

Except I do have the ability to do that, as Frick and Frack wandered into my field of view while I was doing and thinking that. I’ll be able to put them up on all the game that I wasn’t able to get and wish now I could have. The only open variable is if they’ll actually pay attention to me and internalize what I’m going to try to teach them. Probably, they won’t. They’ll just conclude it’s just the ole man doesn’t know what he’s talking about. They’ll have it all figured out and know everything when they get to 17.

Doesn’t matter. They learn it from me sooner and the easy way or from the rest of the world later and the hard way. Either way, learn they shall.

Dutchtown

Natalie Winters in the Steve Bannon orbit discovers the International Institute of St. Louis. Welcome to my (former) world, Nat.

And I’ll say it again, repeating for those needing. The Bosnians being resettled in St. Louis and namely in and around Bevo in 1999 or so, accidentally wound up saving Bevo from the black undertow, which was spreading in that direction before them. Bosnians, being war torn and war hardened, didn’t take any guff or stuff from the Pookie and Ray-Ray caucus.

What that did was teach the civic elites of St. Louis and other similar rust belt cities an important lesson: The way to combat the black undertow in ways that they themselves were too chicken to do is to import hot blooded non-black ethnic groups, plant them near the given city’s blacks, then sit back and grab the popcorn.

Note: In spite of all that, I remain opposed to doing this.

London

The quality (or lack thereof) of debating about these things on Cuck Island in the Current Year is a “two jeets and a cuckservative walk into a pub” joke.

It starts with a former PM, dot Indian, Rishi Sunak, ranting that there’s too much ethnonationalism out there, (though one has to wonder where it even is to begin with; In the highly visible mainstream, only Rupert Lowe has come close to formulating proper ethnonationalism, and just his going that far got him tossed bag and baggage out of Reform), and that we should remember that with the correct standards and safeguards, anyone can become British.

Jacob Rees-Mogg, actually English, and a (forcefully) retired politician from the Tories, “responded” with a ten minute video, mogging Sunak, (sorry, I couldn’t resist), but not really responding critically, more like repeating. His whole case is because a bunch of white people mixed with each other at various points and eras in the past on his island, that, with the correct standards and safeguards, anyone can become English.

Suella Braverman, Indian, and former Home Secretary under Sunak, and now with Reform, “responded” to (mogged?) Rees-Mogg, defending English ethnonationalism, but then saying that, with the correct standards and safeguards, anyone can become British.

So they were all saying the same thing, with one of the three, an Indian woman, granting the English a little bit of an ethnonat carveout.

Scroll up to the title.

This year is a lot of 50th, 100th, 150th, 200th and 250th anniversaries.

One that whizzed passed me even though I should have known it by heart, especially considering family history, is the 150th anniversary of the first ever drop of (American) Budweiser beer being brewed and the founding of Anheuser-Busch. Though I should tell you, like you already know, I’ve been to Ceske Budejovice, Czechia, (German name of the town is Budweis), visited the “original” Budweiser brewery. Original Budweiser just totally takes belt to ass of St. Louis Budweiser. Sorry, gotta keep it a whole buck here. Our return flight ending our honeymoon in 2020 took us right over the town and the brewery.

Yet another one that I almost missed, the exact date was last month. The 150th anniversary of The Great Divorce of St. Louis.

Now derided as The Great Mistake.

In reality, for decades after the fact, it seemed like the right thing to do, and the architects of the matter seemed to be on the right side of history.

After all, they carved out such a big piece for what would become the independent city of St. Louis that it was inconceivable that it would need any more space than that, and that the whole 61 square miles would ever be truly developed.

Then along came the automobile, then paved roads.

Then along came post-WWII prosperity and suburbanization all over America.

St. Louis City’s official decennial census population peaked at 856k in 1950, and probably did peak close to a million early in the ’50s thanks to the baby boom, but then fell to 750k, 622k and 453k in 1960, 1970 and 1980, respectively. With the 1970 to 1980 falloff of more than a quarter being the most drastic.

As late as 1950, the Divorce didn’t seem like a mistake. By 1980, everyone important in St. Louis knew it was.

This is why you don’t ever want to make long term decisions based on short term passions. It’s because you don’t know what you don’t know, the unknown unknowns, especially about the relatively distant future.

Lower Manhattan

Where was I and what I was doing when I found out that 9/11 was happening.

Twenty-four years old and change I was on the day.

I was sort of “between jobs” in early September 2001, and what I was doing before and what I was doing after that “between” period wasn’t anything to write home about, especially compared to what I would eventually do and what I’m doing now. This was when I was being a semi-semi-professional DJ, (a talent that I utilized just this past Sunday), but September 10 was a Monday and the 11th a Tuesday, so it would not have been a spinning night for me; Rarely did I do it other than the usual fare of Friday and Saturday nights, in those days and that era.

What I really did that particular night is that I was up really late the night before and into the overnight ragchewing with people in various IRC chatrooms (and if you know what IRC was/is, then you’re really dating yourself), arguing with people about Gary Condit. Who was the really hot topic right then, the time before everything changed. Gary Condit’s name these days being a metaphor for caring about piddly things in contrast to the important things.

So I crashed really late or really early, depending on how you want to think of the time.

Next thing I know, my mother (now late) was waking me up, asking me which building in New York was the World Trade Center.

In the very immediacy of me being woken up and being groggy, I thought at first it was a pure aviation accident. Except, by the time I was paying attention even in a groggy sense, much less when I woke up some, both planes had already hit both towers, which meant deliberate action and not accident.

Because 9/11 is my generation’s JFK assassination (a “where were you and what were you” moment that seemed to mark a real turning point), I surmise that the summer of 2001 and the summer of 1963 “felt” like each other in a lot of ways. The world was more tense through most of 1963 than it was in most of 2001, the former still dealing with the Cold War (though right at that time, post-CMC, détente started to kick in), whereas the summer of 2001 was the final stretch of the “End of History” era where nobody important really did or needed to care about anything important. Still, it makes you wonder what the equivalent of Gary Condit was in the summer and early and mid fall of 1963, what seemed to be a big deal at the time but would quickly become comically trivial in a flash.

Some of you can do both JFK and 9/11 when asked this question.

Magdeburg

Dateline from the same city where I happen to be, in advance for what could be an upcoming Sunday that changes everything. If you read my social feeds, you already know the play by play. Needless to say, we are five years short of the quadricentennial of the last time when things in this city were so intense.

This is more of a blog-appropriate archival profundity.

There’s all this, which is mostly about the hypocrisy of the matter related to all that is going on right under my feet. Google Translate loses nothing important.

I want to talk about the differences between RWEs who turn Judas and go full leftard on the one hand, and RWEs who sort of “age out” of the goober groups (as I’ve been calling them for a long time) and go into more starched shirt and mainstream-ish alt or dissident right activities.

The difference in the way they’re treated, you can read in this article.

I want to talk about the more back dated deeper psychological differences between the two groups.

When it comes to the first group, the RWEs that switch to the left, what it all means, and what it all adds up to, is that they were never were ideologically dedicated to RWE-ism or the RW to begin with. That they only were or cosplayed RWE because it was a cool, tittilating, transgressive, provocative, shock-inducing, in sort of a fad/trend sense. And that when they got bored with and tired of it like kids do toys, (which is another useful metaphor to explain the initial attraction, that RWE was just the new shiny toy), they discover that they spent all those years running around with bent cross flags and clothing, or something similar. Then they see groups like ADL and SPLC in America, or AAS and ZdJ here, and their supporters, who will pay a lot of money to hear about “ex”-“Nazis” and RWEs and their “Damascene conversions.” Because, like this article says, the kook left just eats it up. Just as they once superficially pretended to be Nazis, they can just as easily flip and invert and superficially pretend to be leftards, and collect big checks along the way. In the case of a few of them, they might actually become left wingers. That, and in the case of the reformed RWE circuit sponsored by the SPLC, you have to wonder if some of those people ever were RWE, superficial or otherwise, because half of them it seems like turn out to be people that nobody back in the RWE scene ever heard of or could place with a face. The accusation here being that the Damascenes are full on SPLC actors, and after months of indictments of the SPLC, it’s a contention that has become all the more plausible, and in fact, we might actually get proof of in the coming months and years as the legal trials proceed. For as much money as the paranoia-industrial complex can make off the back of sap leftists who want to hear about this “ex”-“Nazi” who came to Jesus, the motive to create Potemkin defectors out of thin air is obvious.

Alongside of that, Kevin DeAnna told the FroJax guys a few weeks ago something I already figured out, that in his years in the movement, that sure as Christ made apples, that people who come into the movement with really big intense fire and energy and radicalism are the first ones to flame out, and they either become left wingers, or just disappear back into normiedom, or go into some weirdo pursuit. So you have to wonder how serious they were. Or if they were, then it was just a matter of the reality that our sector is one that requires marathon runner discipline and pacing. Because it took decades upon decades to assemble the machine we’re resisting, it’s going to take just as long to dismantle it or build our own machine to take it out. Sprinters come in expecting quick and fast social and political changes, and when it inevitably doesn’t happen that way, they get disillusioned, and then leave either for the left or kookville or back to normiedom. In contrast, people who have always approached the movement and the sector with more moderate ideology, temperament, energy and expectations (Kevin DeAnna making a very clear allusion to his boss, Jared Taylor) are the ones who will probably be at it for decades (as JT has been). JT is a marathoner, compared to Richard Spencer (who I know KDA was thinking of) was a sprinter. JT was built for the long haul and unsurprisingly has been in a long haul cause for a long haul of time. In contrast, there’s a reason Usain Bolt never entered a marathon.

Now for the latter group, people who initially sign on with goober groups as young/er people but then slowly age out of them, grow up a little, put on starched shirts and ironed slacks and go to work for mainstream-presenting outfits (even if their politics aren’t yet mainstream). Yes, in this country, the many people who used to be involved in what are euphemistically called Verfassungswidrigesgruppen (“unconstitutional organizations,” think: The latter day fan club of the failed Austrian painter), as teenagers and YAs, but then quit them and migrate over to the AfD or some “Stiftung” (“foundation” or “think tank”) as they get into middle age, are an example. The psychology behind them is that they were genuinely invested in and dedicated to right wing (i.e. right of the normie right) ideology, but they started getting interested at a time when either the starched shirt orgs didn’t exist, or they didn’t know about them. But it doesn’t mean they didn’t have the itch that needed to be scratched. They therefore “scratched” by strapping up with a goober group, having no better option. You can draw the same analogy in America, only the names of the groups on both side of the legitimacy divide are different. Once they get tired of gooberville, and figure out it’s going nowhere, they’ll go mainstream if there is a mainstream boat to get aboard. Remember, in the case of the several individuals listed in this article that transitioned from goober to AfD, when they started out in goober, the AfD didn’t exist, not even as a twinkle in Frauke Petry’s eyes. AfD wouldn’t even exist until February 2013, and wouldn’t become what it is today until the events of eleven years ago at this time of which everyone is now familiar. For its first two and a half years, it was mainly a Euroskeptic and anti-bailout party; Once the bad effects of the Merkel bailouts (a saga that never got any media play in America, in contrast to eleven years ago and swinging the gates open), washed through and out, the AfD’s first surge of support from being anti-bailout also washed out. Wir Schaffen Das gave it new purpose and new life, eventually leading to the present moment.

So, when it comes to the people who started out in the goober right and transitioned to the starched shirt pop-nat-right as they got older, it also tells me that they would have never gone on with the goober groups if they even had the starched shirt groups as an option when they were first cutting their teeth. Which is to say, if the AfD was formed say in 2000 instead of 2013, then these people would have gone with it from the jump and would have never had any interest in the goober groups to begin with. For proof of that, I can attest that the AfD getting to a certain level of strength totally wiped out everything to its own right in this country, goober or otherwise, other than the one or two cranks that might still belong to this or that. If you were, say, 16 years old, in this country, in 2000, and of a certain mindset, you might have started running with the bent cross yahoos. But the comparably situated 16-year olds of 2026 are going straight to the AfD, not passing Go, not collecting $200, and thus, will luckily avoid the future embarrassment of being associated with bent crosses.

To wrap this up, my personal opinion about the controversial husband of the stunning beauty you see in the article’s thumbnail is this: I don’t really believe he ever was a genuine neo-Nazi, because I don’t believe he’s a genuine Greenie now. He claimed neo-Nazi back in 1995 for the same reason he’s a Green Party member now. In both instances, he was just buckling to a fad.

Any field, profession or sector whose professional rhetoric customarily requires a circumscribed writing or composition style is ripe for cuckoldry from large language model artificial intelligence.

I will expound later, though if you’ve been reading my social feeds for long enough, you can already figure it out.

New York City

Likewise, I thought they got rid of these services a long time ago.

Considering my social media avatar, I had already watched the Leave It To Beaver episode when I was a kid, the one in the last season where The Beaver joins one of these record clubs and then quickly gets in arrears. So I knew the time of day when I myself joined one of these clubs when I was in college. Pay attention to the fine print, do all the paperwork, send everything in on time. Which means I did not suffer from The Beaver’s fate. However, it didn’t take me that long with a little math to learn that it was not really a good deal in the long run. It didn’t take long for the total amount I paid divided by the number of CDs I got to get high enough to where it was only a bit lower than the typical prices in the record stores (they were all brick and mortar in those days). And whatever I saved via this club was offset by the time and aggravation of having to deal with all the mickey mouse paperwork. That was my baptism by fire in learning that there really is no such thing as a free lunch; In the case of commercial music, there are copyrights and IP and all the expenses that were going to have to get paid and financed one way or another. Things are going to cost, one way or the other. No such thing as five CDs for a penny. I quit the club the first moment I could.

Later, I would learn of this hustle called Sodastream. If you listened to American talk radio circa 2010 give or take, then you heard Sodastream ads. I instantly disbelieved it, because I guessed it was the same thing as the CD/record clubs, not a good deal in the long run and what little you saved was offset by the aggravation of having to use maintain and babysit the machine. After a little bit of looking it up, I saw that Sodastream’s pitch was that you got soda for twenty-five cents a serving. Which is what made it seem like a cheap deal, because when people bought single cans of soda in a circumstance when they were buying only one can, they were paying way more than a quarter for the can. But that was their deceptive marketing: Really, a “serving” for Sodastream purposes was defined as twelve ounces. Extrapolate, and that was $1.41 for a 2L bottle or $3 for a case of twelve. Those days, I could often find the name brand sodas at mainstream supermarkets for that or lower. Furthermore, the quarter-a-cup thing was only for Sodastream’s house brands; national brands’ syrup base for use in Sodastream machines was more expensive. So you sometimes even lost the advantage of dollars and cents, not even counting the intangible costs of time and hassle.

All that experience is why I was able to predict even from an early point in time after Netflix streaming became popular that, as good as a deal as it seemed at the time, it wouldn’t last. Because of the shows’ content IP and copyrights, no such thing as a free lunch. The IP/copyright owners of all this motion picture content weren’t going to sit back and let Netflix pick up all their million dollar bills lying on the sidewalk. That you now need 87 kajillion services to do what the initial promise of Netflix was only proved me correct.

Lewiston, Maine

Very long but worth reading. Author is “black” but is so light skinned that there’s a chance that he could have passed for white in the old days when that was something of a necessity. Compared to the current year where white people are trying to pass for black. He also seems moderate-center-left politically. Just keep that in mind as you read.

My key points:

(1) It further proves my contention that a lot of current era woketardness is a matter of elites trying to keep ground level leftists and people in general away from left wing economic populism. Note that he said that the same admin pushing woketard was suppressing unionization.

(2) It further proves my Hagiography Syndrome theory, that these people are just LARPing the left’s long ago and relatively ancient big wins, because they have no real fights to fight now. That they need convenient substitutes. Ersatzhandlungen, as they say in this country.

(3) More evidence that white liberal women love effeminate type left wing black gay men. It’s because they get the token black they need so much but in a non threatening non stereotypical package and demeanor.

(4) More evidence that woketardness is nothing more than an inversion of that which it claims to despise and oppose. “Photographic negative,” as Richard Spencer termed it back when he was part of our movement.

(5) Demonstrating something that I figured out a long time ago: That supposed “student activism” isn’t really the students, it’s certain professors and administrators winding up the students and using them as their handmaidens for what they want. As I wrote in my 54th Axiom: “Whenever a mass group of young people do something, there is always an old person behind it. If a mass of young men bearing arms take a hill, there is an old man with stars on his helmet behind it. Likewise, when you see masses of young “anarchists,” there is an old man with tenure behind it.”

Ceuta, Spain

These “zomg Putin,” “zomg Israel,” “zomg Trump” theories running wild. Because that’s just what we do.

The Putin theory has no plausible basis in reality. Putin and his mini-me in Belarus certainly do use weaponized migration against NATO member states, but it’s at the Belarus-Poland border, not “way over there.” As a matter of fact, they just found a tunnel between Belaurs and Lithuania dug for just that purpose.

Only the other two have some veneer of plausibility, because Morocco has signed the Abraham Accords, and Trump during both terms has cultivated good relationships with Morocco and is currently not seemingly enthralled with Spain.

I would need some receipts before I start believing them. So far, the proponents haven’t produced any. Seems like they only buy into those theories because they tickle their ears. Ear tickling =/= evidence. I do know that some fire breathers on the far right of Israel’s politics have been spiking the football, claiming God’s retribution blah blah blah. While that’s as insane and irrational and ignorant as, for example, the few Christian preachers and televangelists who claimed that the Northridge earthquake in 1994 was God’s vengeance against the corn industry (at the time, most of the world’s corn was produced in the San Fernando Valley), it’s apropos of nothing evidential.

Meanwhile, we have the plain and obvious documented truth dancing in front of us in plain sight. That Morocco is and always has done Morocco-y things. Like, organize Green Marches and use weaponized migration.

Notice I said “seemingly” above. The reality is that Spain did deploy its most advanced frigate to the Strait of Hormuz, and a lot of Speedy Gonzales’s screaming against the Iran effort is just performative and disingenuous, merely to pander to the Muslim voters in Spain, and cover up for his actively deploying assets to help the American effort. (See also: Keir Starmer). The importance of that is that it serves to refute the theory that the White House is somehow directing this invasion to punish Spain. The White House isn’t really quite that angry at the Sanchez government.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by malice.

Washington, D.C.

I see that Anthony Fauci is finally facing some measure of justice.

Just don’t think he’s ever going to see the inside of a jail cell. And don’t think that any of this is going to change the minds of any of his cult fans.

It’s because this isn’t about that or them.

This is for history.

This is for future versions of society when faced with the same dilemma. Pour encourager les autres.

When it comes to those things, the important things that matter, we’ve already won.

And yes, this is personal for us. In case you’re new here, the better half took an mRNA vax in August 2021, and hasn’t had a time of the month since. She was 34 at the time she did, so it wasn’t menopause. So I above all people have the credibility to say that I’ll gladly take the word “Fauci” becoming an eternal cuss word and cautionary tale over the elderly individual spending even one day in a jail or prison, eight days out of seven every week.

Just to add this for the historical record: The reason why there is and ever got to be a Fauci cult is because he did a lot of heavy lifting in the ’80s and early ’90s to run pseudo-scientific political interference to prevent gay men from getting the socio-political blame for HIV/AIDS. Which made the left then and now eternally thankful. Likewise, his objective during Covid was to protect Beijing at the behest of American politicians either on the Beijing payroll or ideological useful idiots for the same.

Your Blogmeister’s Other German Desk

Much the same thing happened six years ago, when we were on our honeymoon. Ron Unz came out with an essay also being one letter away from the words “white nationalist” in the title that lit the sector afire, but I wasn’t able to read it much less respond to until it was over. Back then, Unz was “immigration was too much of a diversion when blacks are the real problem.” I remember my snarky response was that while we stopped in Belgrade, (which was actually one of our stops), I bought a good used wormhome generator to whiddle myself to an alternate July 2020 where the alt-universe Ron Unz wrote an essay about how blacks are too much of a diversion when immigration is the real problem. It was just my glib way of saying that it’s useless to argue one-or-the-other when they both are; it’s just that, like a game of whack-a-mole, one is going to be a bigger problem than the other at varying times places and circumstances.

So now we come to today, with Scott Greer. Who likewise dropped this while we were on vacation, meaning once again my response is so long after the fact that it’s old shoe so what by now.

I was going to deep dive this, but then I realized that all I need to do is snorkel.

Most of his purported case is that there’s no need for the white nationalist label anymore because normie conservatism (in America, and this matter is America-centric) is adopting heretofore WN positions and mentalities. Greer seems to think that the WN-ification of the broader greater American right has already been fully consummated or close enough for government work. I do think it is happening, but it’s happening slowly, and is far from complete, and is currently nowhere near the level that Greer believes. I know some WNs think that there has been no progress at all, especially considering (their/our misinterpretation of) recent events. I split the difference.

Yet and still, so what? What’s in a name? It’s a silly contention anyway. It’s rug-merchanting over nomenclature. In 1993, Prince legally changed his name to that symbol that’s a mashup of male and female. (In retrospect, he was far ahead of his time). Following Greer’s purported WN reasoning, it means that everyone who bought any Prince records before 1993 get to claim after that they don’t own any Prince records.

If it waddles like a duck, has feathers like a duck and quacks like a duck.

Further down in the article, Greer snarks about “militias out in the woods.” Someone with an IQ of 187 should have known better than to do that, because someone with a 187 IQ and a really good understanding of recent history which he has should have instantly known off the bat that those crowds are the biggest race cucks going, as bad as any (to use the word of vintage 2015 coinage) cuckservative. WNs aren’t run out to the woods people, and run out to the woods people are anti-WN. Run out to the woods types were/are largely informed by right-libertarianism, (“the extreme right wing of the left wing,” as one Counter Currents writer phrased it several years ago), while WN, being race minded people by definition, arrived at WN because of being forced to interact with problematic nons, (Patterson’s First Axiom), which for the better part has happened and still does happen in urban areas (Willie Sutton Doctrine), not out in the woods. Why it took me, a mere peon with a lowly modest pitiful low 140s IQ, three whole standard deviations dumber than Greer, to tell him or you that, God knows.

I also think that even Greer himself knows that nary a liberal, leftist or progressive will be fooled. It might be tempting to think that his whole purpose in WN-by-any-other-name is to get back in good with the left, but, again, someone with a 187 IQ will know better.

Then I realized that it was a mistake to respond like this, because the mistake was to take Greer literally. It was wrong of me to read this article from top to bottom, when the proper way was to read it sideways. You might have noticed that I used the word “purported” twice before this paragraph; That should have been a hint that I’m thinking that he’s rationalizing.

So I’m going to do something that’s really risky pool, against my better judgment, and something I usually advise against:

I’m going to put words in Scott Greer’s mouth.

But once you have read both them and Greer’s essay, you’ll probably conclude that I’m right.

Here’s what he really means by this essay:

I agree with the practical sociopolitical output of white nationalism, but I don’t like the crowd that openly calls themselves white nationalists. I agree with the articles but cringe at the comment section. It’s because open WNs almost always devolve into some mix-or-match of wild, bombastic, loud, rude, hysterical, conspiraTARDial, blackpilling, doom porn peddling, purity spiraling, gossip-mongering, internecine pie throwing, stupidly provocative, just plain stupid, internet bubble mentality, and worst of all, they blame every hung toenail and misaligned throw rug on a certain tribe as if the Jews all have 9000 IQs and are 20 feet tall and bleed liquid arsenic and have bulletproof skin, and WNs will ratio you out of the sector if you’re not as monomaniacally fanatical and extremist about Jews as they are. I just can’t take most of these people home to meet mama.

And ya know? Sometimes, I can’t blame him. These days, and pretty often, I just can’t with the sector. They got me like. Please, touch grass.

Your Blogmeister’s Other German Desk

I have returned from Berlin. Which should now fill in the blanks for you that I left behind before the weekend, if you didn’t already figure it out.

No rest for me, packing for our vacation. Which will be relatively nearby, but also undisclosed until it’s over. And it also means hardly any social posting or blogging, unless something big happens.

But I wanted to take the opportunity to tie together a loose end and also make a prediction.

Patriot Front did a march in DC for the 250th.

Normiecons and lamercons doing their usual “zomg feds” thing.

Except they must have missed the last year and a half.

For one, the FBI is under new management. For two, the SPLC has been knocked flat on the mat. For three, USAID’s non-charitable spending has been eliminated.

Yet, Patriot Front continues.

What’s the conclusion, boys and girls?

They’re genuine. Even if their tactics are questionable.

Then again, I figured that out some time ago, because PF wasn’t moving in the ways that Feds/plants do. That, and their leader, Thomas Rousseau, is a frequent guest on sector outlets, including with Jared Taylor, from time to time.

Frojax was live and on site for the PF march.

Speaking of whom.

Frojax (brothers Forrest and Jackson) are a new creator duo that has really gotten a lot of traction in the American sector and really quickly.

Unfortunately, I don’t think they’re going to be able to make it that big, at least compared to other sector notables past and present.

That which makes them really presentable and of the sort that you would feel perfectly comfortable in taking home to meet the parents, the things which you would think would fuel their big future success and popularity and notoriety, are the very things which mean that they won’t.

They’re affable, approachable, patient at debating, linear, never get loud, never scream, never shout, and at least so far never say anything wild or off the wall or deliberately provocative.

Does that sound like someone in the sector that you’ve known or known of for several decades? Right. And now you know why I’m making the prediction that I just did.

You see, in our sector, at least until the social ecosystem changes, the only way to gain big notoriety is to be some mix-or-match of wild, bombastic, loud, rude, hysterical, conspiraTARDial, blackpilling, doom porn, purity spiraling, gossip-mongering, internecine pie throwing, stupidly provocative, and just plain stupid, so that the mainstream media with its nutpicking penchant will pay you attention. Above all else, blame every hung toenail and misaligned throw rug on a certain tribe, at which point it will become unquestionable gospel that you better unquestionably believe lest you be ratoed out of the sector.

To put it another way, sector assets get ignored, sector detriments get attention.

The Frojax brothers might get a little bit of mainstream media run initially, but once it’s figured out that they’re no ways useful to discredit the rest of the sector and the movement, they’ll never get called again. Just like the older individual I just riddled about, that being Jared Taylor. Frojax are just the new and young JT.

From where I sit, you don’t look a day over 200.

Not so coincidentally, the bicentennial of the passings of both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, which I mentioned two years ago in the post about Jimmy Carter turning 100.

As for tomorrow, I’ll be spending it in a special but very appropriate place for a special get-together, one whose real estate just happens to be in this country, but whose mission is that of my own. That should be enough of a hint. “You’ll be spending America’s 250th birthday WHERE?” My much younger self would totally not believe it.

Philadelphia

You may be wondering if the American Declaration of Independence has ever been translated into German.

In fact, it was within a very few days of its completion and adoption translated and published, for the benefit of those in Pennsylvania and elsewhere who didn’t speak English well or at all.

An image of the original, and its easier to read text.

A declaration of independence in general, and the one that is about to turn 250 years old, in this country’s language, is called a Unabhängigkeitserklärung. Now, before you start pulling your hair out of your head and screaming about how Mark Twain was right, just calm down.

It’s as easy as this:

In the long word, you see “hang” (same meaning) and “klar” (“clear”). From there, you can figure out the rest.

Your Blogmeister’s Other German Desk

I realized something a few hours ago.

I’ve had my feet in this country for one reason or another (tourist, 2018 and then expat/employment, 2022 and 2026) for part or whole of the last three World Cups. In all three instances, Die Mannschaft (the name for the country’s national team), checked out early and with a decidedly less than stellar result. Not making it past the group stage in 18 and 22, and losing in the first game of the knockout stage yesterday on tiebreaking kicks, which was the first time DM ever lost in a WC game on tiebreaking kicks.

The last time there was a World Cup and my feet were not on this country’s soil? 2014. When they won it all, including the 7-1 rout of the host Brazil on their own soil in the semifinal.

Let’s just say I’m glad I’m not a public figure, that I’m not known. Because I seem to be such bad luck for DM that, if I was, they’d hunt me down and deport me right away. And it wouldn’t matter that I have a German wife and two German children (they’re also American nationals via their father). Because they’re just that intense about soccer around here.

And yes, today was probably the most dour day in this country since I’ve been in it, even more than four or eight years ago. Then again, with what happened later yesterday in Netherlands “versus” Morocco, (and I flashed on the heavy storms ahead when I saw that matchup was going to happen in the first round of the knockouts), you know, where the Moroccan team whose players live in The Netherlands beat the Dutch team full of Moroccan players who live in The Netherlands, and the victory riots that the Moroccans, both those with and without Dutch passports, went on today, I’m happy that this country hardly has any Paraguayans. Ironically, Paraguay has 60,000 Germans, it being a somewhat common destination for expats from here.

Yorba Linda, Calif.

Whaddaya know. More than thirty years after he left this world, Richard Nixon is having another comeback. We’ve got Nixon to kick around once again.

But what have Dave and I always said about history? The past has zero control over how the future is going to view the past, given enough time. Maybe the most fabulously rich people in their times and lives can set up trust funds to hire whore-storians to construct PR cases and hagiographies about said individual. Eventually, that money dries up, gets burned through, is subdivided among generation after generation of heirs. Then even those people are left at the mercy of the whims of subsequent generations.

So now we arrive at “Nixonmaxxing” being the fourth and posthumous Nixon comeback, after the elder fopo statesmen years of the ’80s and early ’90s as his third, then the late ’60s as his second, and Checkers in ’53 as his first.

And it’s like what I just wrote above. Events and circumstances of more recent years are making people, especially relatively younger people, do the “if they lied about X, then what if they were lying about Y all along” thing, and then doing their own investigation.

I’ve said it myself, that if God gives me the deal of pick one limit one post-WWII President, one evening of conversation over beer, no doubt about it, for me it would be Richard Nixon.

Which is not the same thing as saying as he is my political favorite of the bunch. Obviously, of that universe, Trump is on top.

Nixon, OTOH, if you want the God’s honest truth, administratively locked in the Great Society. In no wise was he any kind of departure from the post-WWII consensus. I think he in fact proudly described himself as a globalist in his Congressional years. That he leveraged his popularity to stop Robert Taft in ’52, and was rewarded with being the running mate. A running mate to someone who was another pea in the same pod as Nixon himself, that being Dwight Eisenhower. Who himself must have given off bad energy and aura during his Presidency even if the media of the time tried to cover it up; My late mother’s two most common words to describe Ike were “bastard” and “sonofabitch.” The more time goes on, the more stupid that strapping up with China to spite the USSR looks, and I predict that this is a trend that will continue on the same trajectory in the near to mid term future. “We are all Keynesians now!” Watergate might have been way overblown, but what is undoubtedly true is that he was paranoid with and about power and a bully with it, generally speaking, especially after 1960 was stone cold stolen from him. (He deliberately avoided pressing the 1960 matter for the good of the country, magnanimity which his country did not repay twelve to fourteen years later, which is why I think Trump was totally right to contest 2020 in every legit way he could). That is why he did what he did with Watergate to begin with, because he was scared that it was all going to be taken away from him yet again. (In retrospect, why? A retarded monkey could have carried 49 states against McGovern in ’72). For another example, look at what he did vis-a-vis George Wallace with the backroom bullying, and, after the assassination attempt, having his FBI try to plant McGovern literature in Arthur Bremer’s hotel room (local cops already had the joint yellow taped off before they could). Ranted about blacks and Jews in private, but politically prostrated to both with his power and denied them almost nothing. He never had much in the way of coattails for his own political party.

But he was a hell of a conversationalist and had a really wide range. That one evening for me would be a lifelong memory and treasure.

What I’m saying is that just because they lied to you about X, doesn’t automatically mean anything either way either in the direction of the truth or lying about Y. Just keep a level head, and avoid the twin evils of pure faith and white pilling on one end and pure cynicism and black pilling on the other hand. Do your own thinking, but cut it down the middle. And remember that words and actions are on opposite sides of the world.

And, no. No Nixonmaxxing for me.

Washington, D.C.

Coddling Movie Substack:

The most popular streamers on the live streaming platforms Twitch and Kick—figures such as Adin Ross, IShowSpeed, Jynxzi, Kai Cenat, all of whom gross millions of views (and sometimes dollars) per month—center their content around gaming, gambling, cryptocurrency, and all sorts of “get rich quick” schemes that bypass traditional credential-based career routes. These are, for millions of young Americans, the most visible and compelling models of adult success available.

This helps explain the aspirations of American teenagers. According to a 2021 poll, American boys ages 13-17 now most commonly list YouTuber and professional gamer as two of the top jobs they “want to be when they grow up.” Where previous generations dreamed of being astronauts, today’s aspirational figures are different. The streamer in his gaming chair was a teenager not long ago. He is accessible, relatable, visibly wealthy, and he got there without a diploma.

The down side to that is that, like a lot of other pursuits, your odds of hitting it really big in streaming are somewhere between miniscule and infinitesimal. But it doesn’t mean that you won’t make any money if you never become Kai, Speed, Adin or Jynxzi. And that’s where the rub comes in. Think of some of the most famous words that Burt Bacharach and Hal David wrote for Dionne Warwick: “L.A. is a great big freeway. Put a hundred down a buy a car. In a week maybe two they’ll make you a star. Weeks turn into years how quick they pass. And all the stars that never were are parking cars and pumping gas.” However, today, all the big streamers that never were aren’t parking cars or pumping gas, metaphorically speaking, because they’re just small streamers. Hint: Search YouTube: “A day in the life of a small streamer.” There’s a reason why you get a wholehelluvalotta results; it’s because there are a wholehelluvalotta small streamers. The danger is that nobody will want to do the car parking and gas pumping work so to speak because being a small streamer winds up being good enough. That is, until the unsustainable economics of social media platforms, both video and otherwise, finally come home to roost.

See what I just did there? I found a through line between Dionne Warwick and Jynxzi, which is something only I can do, or would do.

Washington, D.C.; Paris

About that. I have a theory.

I don’t think that the anger that many black opinion makers and talking heads have about this particular controversy should be taken quite as face value.

Their level of white hot rage over the some lame brain goofy shit that most people would shrug off, makes me curious.

It’s because I don’t think their anger is really about whether Josh Hokit or anyone else actually believes that Michelle Obama is really a man. I happen to think that they know as well as anyone else that this “Michelle Obama is a man” yapping is just a dumbass fad that next to nobody who spouts it actually literally or seriously believes.

Why they’re really angry is the fact that anyone is even saying or thinking it to begin with, even if it’s out of a sense of jocularity or just to be glib or stupid.

And I think when you boil it all down, the root of it is blacks’ continued and subconscious anxiety and insecurity over their own lower sexual dimorphism compared to other groups. Meaning that black women are still insecure because they think that others believe that they look too much like black men. And if black women are angry about something, that instantly means that a high percentage of black men will have no choice but to be angry about it, considering blacks’ matriarchal nature.

Note: At the same time, crossing oceans and races, Emmanuel Macron’s wife is also constantly accused of being a man. I know that in that country on the other side of the Rhine from me, those accusations are mostly ignored, no crashing out. Part of it is to starve the silliness of oxygen, and another part of it is that as a generality (real) French women don’t suffer from this lack of dimorphism insecurity.

London

I think I’ve figured something else out that I sorta missed before.

Obviously, the sudden jihad from officialdom about social media is significantly political.

But there’s another reason.

Two Tier said in this proscription announcement against social media earlier today that he “wants to give children back their childhood.”

That phrasing rang bells in my head.

Remember, it is said of my sub-generation (“X-Ennials,” 1975-1980-ish birth years), that we had an analog childhood and a digital adulthood.

Now it’s becoming clear. A big part of the motivation for this is that Xennials, Gen X Classic, and Jones (i.e. latter half of the Boomers) are getting nostalgic about their own childhoods and are imposing that nostalgia on today’s younger people. It’s the “kids these days you kids will never know what it’s like to (blah blah).”

Washington, D.C,; Tehran

I think you can figure out the rest.

One thing that should be obvious thanks to these last three and a half months is that the “zion don” yappers in our sector are full of it. To wit, among many other examples:

Washington, D.C.

Trump’s 80th birthday, only two days after Elon Musk becomes the world’s first trillionaire.

Both names will resonate for centuries to come. Elon’s will resonate longer and more widespread because of the future ramifications of what he is doing today.

Yet and still:

What a time to be alive. “May you live in interesting times” need not always be a curse. Our grandchildren just may be jealous of us.

Which leads me to the NYT.

The pitfalls with this are being bipolar about it and think about it in either-or terms. Then again, I’m in a country full of people who have a reputation for either standing on the accelerator or standing on the brake. And I know I have that bad habit too, almost as if we’re loosely related. Moderation and cutting it down the middle are definitely acquired tastes for me.

This matter, likewise, needs moderate thinking. It’s not true that he’s just as spry and energetic as he was in his younger years, even ten years ago. It’s also not true that he’s right on the vestibule of being a human vegetable. The moderate way to think about this is that you can’t get around 80 years old, but he’s in high percentile shape for 80 years old and a man and someone doing about the most stressful public life-in-a-fishbowl job in existence.

Needless to say, “Trump 2028” was and is always nothing more than a merch hustle. Even if there was some sort of legal or constitutional pathway.

And I know I won’t even live to 80.

Washington, D.C.

Greg Johnson reviews Ibram X.’s new book.

Or what seems to be “his” new book.

Just going to cut and paste the comment I left there, here, with a few usage corrections.

*

Kendi (or whoever wrote this for him, and I’ll get to that) mentioned the Potsdam meeting in late November 2023.

In case you’re new here, that was just one of several stops for Martin Sellner on his book tour to advertise Regime Change von Rechts and to pre-advertise Remigration. I know, because I went to the one immediately before the stop in Potsdam, that being in Paderborn.

Soon after 2024 began, a left wing taxpayer funded outfit in this country called Correctiv concocted a story that made the Potsdam stop to be some sort of Wannsee 2.0. When all Martin did there was his usual spiel on that tour, including what I saw with my own eyes in Paderborn. (And he reenacted on his Rumble channel after the controversy broke). Eventually, the matter was taken to court, and Correctiv had to retract. Though quite a few people still want to believe Correctiv’s initial tall tale, or at least they want others to believe it, in the sense that the lie is already halfway around the world before the truth can get out of bed and put its boots on.

Somehow, someway, Kendi got wind of this and included this in this book.

Or did he?

That gets me to my second point.

I first heard of this book and its contents a few months ago. Right from the jump, I was suspicious about the whole thing. Why are we to believe that this midwitted skintellectual whose only real care before now was this that or the third gap between black people and everyone else in the United States, really cares about the nuances of Renaud Camus, the Le Pen family, (he seems to spend a whole lot of time on France, curiously), and of course, the Bad Mustache Man? What is any of this to him? What’s wrong with this picture? “One of these things is not like the other…”

My theory is that whoever wrote this for him was clever enough to write it in his goofy rambling disjointed hysterical “style,” so that his name as the authorship would not be questioned, but in reality wanted to write a book that really addressed the fears of upscale white liberals and organized activist Jewish interests, albeit one that has “Ibram X. Kendi” and his currently fashionable (among the American left) name listed as the official author.