10

Say I have an array of arrays, and I want to return the first element of each array within the array:

array = [[["028A","028B","028C","028D","028E"],
          ["028F","0290","0291","0292","0293"],
          ["0294","0295","0296","0297","0298"],
          ["0299","029A","029B","029C","029D"],
          ["029E","029F","02A0","02A1","02A2"]],
         [["02A3","02A4"],
          ["02A5", "02A6"]];

I know I can do something like this:

var firsts = [];
_.each(array, function(item){
  _.each(item, function(thisitem){
    firsts.push(_.first(thisitem));
  });
});

but what if I want to do it with underscore's _.chain() method? Just learning underscore, and so far seems very useful.

0

1 Answer 1

30

You could do it with flatten and map thusly:

var firsts = _.chain(array)
              .flatten(true) // This true is important.
              .map(function(a) { return a[0] })
              .value();

Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/cm3CJ/

You use flatten(true) to convert your array-of-arrays-of-arrays into an array-of-arrays and then the map peels off the first element of each inner array.

If you want something shorter than the map, you could use pluck to pull out the first element of the inner arrays:

var firsts = _.chain(array)
              .flatten(true) // This true is important.
              .pluck(0)
              .value();

Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/pM9Hq/

_.pluck is just a map call anyway:

// Convenience version of a common use case of `map`: fetching a property.
_.pluck = function(obj, key) {
  return _.map(obj, function(value){ return value[key]; });
};

This one looks a lot more like the .map(&:first) that you'd use in Ruby so it might be more familiar to some people and more concise once you're used to pluck. If you really want something Rubyish, you could use a non-anonymous function with map:

var first  = function(a) { return a[0] };
var firsts = _.chain(array)
              .flatten(true) // This true is important.
              .map(first)
              .value();
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

I found the use of pluck very interesting in this context. It paves the way for extracting seconds, thirds, and so on. The Rubish solution, using underscore since the very beginning, could use as first line the following code: var first = function(a) { return _.first(a); };
@ChaosManor: You wouldn't even need first in your Underscore has _.first, you could just say .map(_.first).

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.