
Reviewing anything is probably quite silly.
It’s an alarmingly ego-fed act to put yourself in a position of having not just an opinion but then sharing that opinion and, further, expecting that opinion to be taken seriously — perhaps even expertly.
Certainly when a review truly becomes an emblem of earned expertise, we call it a critique. And the reviewer transcends mere thumbs-up-thumbs-down pedantry and embraces expertise as a critic. At least, that’s true of books and movies and other pieces of art — true too of restaurant meals, but less true, I think, of an apple. I can review an apple but can I really… critique an apple? One supposes that some apples were in fact somewhat more “designed” than others, and maybe, maybe those can earn a critique. But it is weird to critique a piece of fruit that sprung up out of the ground largely unbidden. It feels like, I JUDGE YOU, NATURE. I BITE MY THUMB AT YOU, MOTHER GAIA. YOUR FRUITS ARE SUBSTANDARD. CALL ME WHEN YOU’VE DECIDED TO TAKE THE HARVEST SERIOUSLY, YOU AMATEUR PLANET. GET IT TOGETHER, COSMOS.
And yet, here I am.
Reviewing apples like some kind of apple-reviewing asshole.
And I’m going to now somewhat negatively review an apple — and it’s an apple that I think a lot of people like, because it has been recommended to me many-a-time. So, before I do that, let’s just note that nothing I say should be taken seriously, and you should like what you like. A lot of negative reviews (reviews, not critiques) really do come from a place of, “I bought this duck but I wanted a dog.” They then review the duck from the disappointment of having no dog when a dog was desired and perhaps even expected. “This duck will not play fetch with me. This duck does not guard my home! I thought this duck would cuddle me but the duck does not cuddle. This duck is terrible.”
So, when I review this apple, understand that I am reviewing from a place of: I wanted an apple I did not get. But it might be an apple you actually want! And that’s fine. Even if you’re wrong because I am a monstrous apple snob.
Let’s talk about the Ambrosia apple.
A lot of people told me to find the Ambrosia apple. It’s a Canadian variety — from BC, I’m to understand — with the exciting origin story of, “An apple tree popped up and the fruits were good so we made more of it.” (Weird fact: there is apparently a ‘premium’ version of this apple called the Ambrosia Gold. Except it’s just the same apple? I don’t think it gets satellite radio or vibrates or anything. Branding is wild.)
I ate the Ambrosia apple.
It is, in short, a child’s apple.
It’s an apple for a second-grader’s lunchbox. Maybe a third-grader’s. By fourth-grade, I expect greater discernment. By fifth grade, one hopes the child has learned to seek complexity and refinement; no longer content with mere chicken nuggies, they seek a perfectly roast chicken. Or perhaps Coq au Vin.
This apple is the chicken nuggies of apples.
It is very, very sweet.
It was not really at all tart.
It tasted like bubblegum — almost cherry bubblegum.
The one thing it really has going for it is that this apple was a near-to-perfect texture. It’s not soft. It’s crisp, but not crunchy. Which makes it easy and fast to eat. Sometimes it’s really, really nice biting into an apple that seems like it wants to be eaten. It does not resist consumption but rather has made itself perfect for its own destruction by teeth and tummy acid. And this apple has that texture. It’s juicy. That crispness is light, almost airy. It simply disappears under mouth assault.
And that sweetness obviously isn’t unpleasant. But I don’t want bubblegum, or just bubblegum, when I eat an apple.
I WANT TO LIVE, DAMN YOU.
I dunno. It’s fine! You might like it. I don’t care for it. I’ll use it in applesauce but will definitely zhuzh (is that how you spell that word) it up with some citrus to tart it up a good bit. I’m sure it’s just me. This duck is a terrible dog.
Final score: I can’t go below a 5.0 out of 10 but I can’t go above it either, it is the near-perfect exemplar of ‘mid’
Ambrosia: for fans of Paw Patrol

2026 reviews so far:
Gravenstein | Hubbardston Nonesuch | Lamb Abbey Pearmain | Hewes Crab | Opalescent | Chenango Strawberry | William’s Pride | Blenheim Orange | Golden Nugget | Doctor Harvey | Kickapoo Spice | St Edmunds Pippin | Sops of Wine | Fenceline Surprise | Americus Crab | Campfield | Graham | Jonagold | Reine des Reinettes Re-Review | Glockenapfel | Franc Rambour | Grimes Golden
2025 reviews:
Honeycrisp, Sweetie, Crimson Crisp, Knobbed Russet, Cortland, Maiden’s Blush, Cox’s Orange Pippin, Reine des Reinettes, Ingrid Marie, Hudson’s Golden Gem, Holstein, Suncrisp, Ashmead’s Kernel, Opalescent, Orleans Reinette, Black Gilliflower, Red Delicious Double Feature, Jonathan, Ruby Mac, Crimson Topaz, Esopus Spitzenburg, Mutsu, Hunnyz, Winesap, Stayman Winesap, Winter Banana, Ribston Pippin, Rhode Island Greening, Roxbury Russet, Opal, Cosmic Crisp, Black Oxford, Ananas Reinette, Sugarbee, Granny Smith, LucyGlo/LucyRose, Ludacrisp, D’arcy Spice, Lemonade, Wild Twist








