“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)

  • The Clancy Children


    The trial of Lindsey Clancy is ongoing and we are going to see either a verdict or a mistrial very soon. If a verdict, there could be an appeal. This case is making headlines because it is incredibly horrific. But there are a few things that are bothering me about this trial that I am going to say very publicly.

    The first is the way in which the state’s experts are blatantly lying, bending evidence to suit them, and pretending that the psychiatrists and medical professionals in this case are without fault.

    I’m looking at both sides of this case and seeing a lot of problems coming from one particular side.

    First of all, this case makes me want to write a book when it is all over. I haven’t been privileged to see all of the evidence since I do have a day job, but what I have seen has had me siding with her attorney, Kevin Reddington, throughout the trial.

    Based purely on the medications she was on, and the adverse reactions she was having, there is a zero percent chance that Lindsey Clancy was in her right mind and criminally responsible for anything. The theory that she is a selfish woman faking mental illness as an excuse to kill her children would completely fall apart in the minds of the audience to this drama, if it weren’t for the level of education of the general public when it comes to the law. But you shouldn’t have to go to law school, give birth, or experience drug-induced psychosis to understand basic things like, that most women don’t murder their kids and try to cover up their motives by taking 32 prescription drugs and permanently paralyzing themselves.

    It was not a faked suicide attempt. It was either a real one, or it was an attempted murder. If suicide, I hold the doctors responsible for every move of her hands. They knew what they were doing, or had every reason to know when prescribing 32 different medications in a 4 month time frame.

    Today I noticed something odd. The psychiatrist testifying in the state’s rebuttal case stated that Lindsey Clancy woke up in the hospital remembering nothing, and had to be informed of the events that took place. Clancy then gave him a detailed account of her “memory” of events, which had later mysteriously resurfaced after the series of events was retold to her, including her falsely claiming that she actually cut the window screen to jump out, as well as not describing anything about crushing up any pills.

    It seems that the expert could not get Lindsey to say she crushed them up no matter how hard he prompted her to recall the way in which he thinks she gave herself an overdose.

    I found it nothing less than shocking that the state waited 3 years to interview her with an expert, while the defense had their expert interview her within months. Not only that, but they expect her exact wording to never change throughout three whole years and numerous hours retelling the alleged memories to many different people. Lindsey Clancy wasn’t following a script – she was allegedly retelling events. When a person is truth-telling, they don’t use the exact same words each time. An “inconsistency” isn’t that – if you’re only talking about minor differences in the story. You can’t expect someone who has been through a severe trauma to stick to exact wording.

    In the law there is the concept of people having their stories identical between them when someone has collaborated on a crime. Exactly identical wording between co-conspirators is a sign they’re sticking to the official story that they made up together. When two witnesses have slight differences between them, it’s a sign they are telling the truth. I find it funny that they expect her to hold to a level of perfection in exact wording over a three year period, when any normal person would forget or slightly change the way they retell events over time due to the passage of time, the fact that we are not robots, etc. Not to mention, she’s on a lot of medications, and those alone would potentially alter memories.

    Watching her in court is absolutely devastating and heartbreaking. She will spend the rest of her life in a prison of that wheelchair regardless of what the outcome of this trial may be.

    Why was the psychiatrist stating that Patrick Clancy mentioned that they do not keep lemonade around the house normally? Yet Lindsey didn’t mention anything about crushing pills?

    In my educated opinion, giving extra details that don’t matter is usually a sign of deception. Like seriously, so what Patrick? You’re hyper-fixated on lemonade? You wanted to make sure in advance to claim that you guys never buy lemonade, to make the overdose completely not your fault, when nobody at that time was implying that it was. Do you not have other liquids in your house, why are you claiming lemonade isn’t a thing?

    In my opinion, this may be a “tell” and his statement claiming lemonade is never in their home might be used to tip off investigators and help them detect “someone” who is hiding information. Whenever I have been on the stand in trial (which was a few too many times to be honest) I have always taken the approach of answering the question in a straightforward way, and not letting my tendency to ramble get the better of me. When you are a witness in a trial, every word you say, and every facial expression you make is going to be analyzed by someone. So it’s best to just answer in as few words as you can, if it’s a highly contentious trial and you have something to lose.

    We know that Lindsey didn’t cut a window screen. So why is she saying she did? The state is hyper-focused on things they think Lindsey held back or did not say to those interviewing her over the course of the past three years, but why haven’t they considered the possibility that her memories are not real at all, but her mind has recreated them after the fact where there was just a blank slate? How could she keep her symptoms and versions of the truth straight if she doesn’t remember anything at all, and her memories were actually false? As if psychotic people don’t make up events, make up memories of events, or fill in the blanks trying to compensate in the aftermath of trauma.

    Another major flaw in their case – the state believes falsely and is having their lying experts claim, that you can’t be suffering from the adverse effect of a medication, a side effect, or anything resembling psychosis without a level of medication that could kill you from an overdose. This is the world’s stupidest claim, and I can’t wait to watch Kevin Reddington dismantle it tomorrow.

    Psychosis is a potential side effect of every psychiatric drug and can be seen at any and every dose, not just a toxic level. The package inserts do not state that you must first OD before experiencing psychosis. If that were true, how could anyone ever live to tell about their psychosis? I’m a living testament to the fact that a mere 50 mg of Zoloft caused me to see a visual hallucination. And 100, and 150 mg caused much worse intrusive thoughts than 50 mg. I called this psychosis. Now, maybe a forensic psychiatrist would claim that I wasn’t in a psychosis in 2004, but who really cares what these $50k per trial wackos think? If this is what they think, they’re not experts. They’re paid liars.

    This pseudoscience is nothing more than an industry thriving on payments for highly educated / intdoctrinated opinions, and the sales of mind altering substances to the general population. While I am thankful that some people feel better when they go get help from their doctor, what most people never do is that they never ask, what is the ultimate cost? If you get to feel slightly better from a placebo effect, or maybe you feel better with a level of serotonin in your brain beyond what should be there, but someone else has to die for you to have access to that medication, what was the point?

    The Clancy kids are dead. They will never get to live their lives in this world. Their eternities are fixed now, and the potential for who they could have become, how they could have loved, and their very right to exist was stolen by an evil industry. The Bible says that the enemy comes only to steal, kill, and destroy. And the psychiatric profession has made itself enemy number one.

    As more evidence comes out and gets refined by cross, I’m going to post more. But for now, I leave you with these questions:

    Whose DNA was found on the murder weapons, and were there any fingerprints on the handle of the knife upstairs? (Hint – Lindsey’s fingerprints were not on the murder weapons, and none of Lindsey’s DNA is confirmed to be on the two of the three bands (for the male kids) with the third “questionable”. I will have to re-listen to the testimony on the third band. They claim they couldn’t tell if her DNA was on the third band due to familial mixing, but the first two only had male DNA on them.) How does one commit suicide by slicing open their throat or wrists without getting fingerprints on that knife? Was she wearing gloves? If so, where did they go? Did she stop during her psychotic state to worry about fingerprints while trying to unalive herself? Why would someone intending to kill themselves be worried someone might think they were the person who did it and subsequently be trying to conceal their own fingerprints? Can you please make THAT make a bit of sense for me?

    How did Lindsey Clancy get soaking wet? If she was outside for just a few minutes? Did someone hose her down with the hose on the back of the house, which is shown still attached to the spigot in the dead of winter, in the evidence and crime scene photos? Would that have caused her body temp to drop to 82?

    Why did Patrick Clancy waver regarding the 5:24 email sent from his computer? He said it could have been his iPhone, but if he was actually gone at 5:24, you’d think he would have said, “No, not my computer, but definitely from my iPhone.”

    Why wasn’t Patrick Clancy performing CPR on any of his kids when the EMTs went downstairs, but instead was just sitting on the couch? Yet he claimed on the stand that he did do CPR?

    Why is Patrick Clancy’s new wife Lindsey Clancy’s ultimate doppelganger?

    Who did Patrick Clancy book a massage for on December 2, 2022, if it wasn’t for Lindsey, but the prosecutor assumed this happened?

    What did the medical examiner rule as the times of death for the kids, and what time did Callan die before being revived? If the neighbor saw Lindsey outside at 5:50 PM, and Callan was revived at 6:40 PM, what time did he die the first time? Finally, what was the basis for the times of death? Was it based on Patrick’s version of the timeline or something more?

    How did Lindsey Clancy talk to Patrick after he found her, but she couldn’t talk to the EMTs?

    Who was searching for the term “corroded artery”?

    Who was searching for the terms “how to disable the airbags on a Kia”?

    Who was searching for methods of suicide?

    Who was searching for “Can a sociopath be treated”? And who is the sociopath in question?

  • Fake “Vitamin D,” Fake “Folic Acid” and Prenatals: How Common Vitamins May Do More Harm Than Good

    I’ve come across some really bad news regarding supplements I once thought were great, and as a result, I’ve stopped taking all of them. I’m now focusing on how I can get what God intended for us to get from food or organic herbs. Here is a Facebook post I decided to make public, because it includes all the links (well most of them) and you can just find me there and comment, and we can share more info over there. Be sure and scroll through all the comments for the stuff on “Vitamin D” (fake) near the end. https://www.facebook.com/aimeejamey/posts/10157331342659247

    [Edit: Facebook is shadowbanning this content. I clicked on the link and it’s still an active, public post. However, Facebook has locked me out of my account, so here are some more links, just in case this ever does get removed. Facebook locked me out and is trying to make it look as though my vitamin post is gone but it’s not.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnDBaeEUKSo https://thepeopleschemist.com/stinky-sulfur-award-unapproved-drug-disguised-vitamin/?fbclid=IwAR1fo5K3uzV0tgrx_Y3yCx4LH7Jx02EYi2YeJ4m_cR0MOoCrct8tP4Pyh28

    https://uniteforlife.wordpress.com/2020/04/10/fake-vitamin-d-fake-folic-acid-and-prenatals-how-common-vitamins-may-do-more-harm-than-good/%5D

    Unfortunately, an industry that can be our friend can also be our foe. Some people who choose to trust the government to oversee the supplement industry might be surprised to know that the dietary supplement industry is actually not regulated and there is no oversight, simply because natural products don’t fall under the government’s jurisdiction, only drugs do. The legal definition of a drug in the U.S. affects how supplements are defined, in addition to affecting the regulation of patented substances. So while you can’t necessarily believe the claims being made (not that I would believe anything from Pharma) that doesn’t mean that the dietary supplement industry is all bad. However, disturbingly, the vast majority of product on the market is actually in a tablet or a capsule form. And some of it isn’t as natural as is being claimed. You have to ask, if all I need can be concentrated into a little pill, is it going to do what it says? Is there anything in there that isn’t supposed to be? And how did they get it that concentrated, anyway?

    It seems like people have no problem spending hundreds of dollars a month on tablets and pills, but they are afraid to go outside and get sunlight, or do any walking / exercise, or shop harder to change their diets. Quick fixes almost never work and when they do, they must be quick fixes from nature, and not from some artifical, synthetic pill, at least in my opinion. I mean, unless you know everything about what is in the pill and it is in its most natural form and it isn’t a synthetic.

    For one thing, the fake “vitamin D” cholecalciferol that we consume in our food supply, through the form of fortified milk and dairy products, come to find out is actually rat poison. It is also used as gopher control because it can be laid out and it builds up to a toxic level rather than killing immediately so it’s not as harmful to anyone else coming across it, like pets.

    I’ve known this about Vitamin D for years but I didn’t give it much thought until this past year because everything seemed ok with my life. When my oldest was a baby, I researched those nasty Vitamin D drops prescribed to infants and decided to stop them, after finding they were linked to asthma and allergies. Plus, I didn’t think God would have made breast milk insufficient. I wasn’t really thinking that hard about stuff however, because I was either too complacent, or maybe too stressed out by other things. Then one day, I gave birth, and I found out that my baby had Down Syndrome. A doctor at one hospital she was in decided to place hard core pressure on me after I told her that I don’t do Vitamin D drops. This doctor got seriously offended when I told her I had studied them and what I found and then disagreed with her. After that they started discussing CPS with me. Then a different doctor hard core pressured me for over an hour to put my baby on Zantac, claiming it is safe, when I knew it wasn’t because again, I do research all the time, and all I had to do was look up the drug name to refresh my memory. I knew thanks to Evelyn Pringle that all those drugs given to babies were bad, and recalled very vaguely what they had done. But then when I looked it up a lawsuit had just been filed that said there were kidney problems and cancer and sudden deaths linked to the drug, with over 5000 plaintiffs so far. I was astonished at the timing but found it suspicious why so many of my daughter’s DS peers were being told that all DS babies have issues with kidney failure, cancer, and the like. So I started looking more into what was really happening.

    I started to do more research into the vitamins I had been taking for years after I came across a study while researching Down Syndrome that was investigating whether vitamin use had any effect on cancer risk in Down Syndrome. To my surprise, it seems the researchers were looking into whether vitamin use INCREASED cancer risk. Then this year, I saw a headline that popped up on my phone saying that scientists studied foods vs. supplementation and found that only the people who consumed more vitamin rich foods had a lower risk of cancer and early death, but that those who were taking them in supplement form had higher risks of cancer and all other cause mortality.

    Recently, I lost my friend Evelyn Pringle. One of the things that she told me on the phone before she died, is that along with her problems breathing, the doctors thought she had something wrong with her heart. She said she had bloodwork done and they told her that she had really really high levels of “Vitamin D” that were too high, but that she didn’t believe them. I begged her to stop taking it, and she reconsidered my advice, but it seems I was too little too late. And now I don’t want to see anyone else I love get a health problem from taking this poison. After all in studies the cholecalciferol killed rats in only 3 days, so what could it be doing to us in our dairy foods and our fake vitamins?

    So now I am thinking that I will do a little experiment. For years I actually contemplated going vegan and raw to improve my health but for whatever reason I didn’t. Then I came across the Weston A. Price Foundation and the bone broth / nourishing traditions diet. For me, this has helped me a lot as I have implemented bone broth into my diet almost daily. I cook everything I can figure out how to with a home made bone broth.

    I’ve also stopped allowing myself to consume conventional milk or dairy. I will only put milk in my food if it is organic and not fortified with fake “Vitamin D” cholecalciferol. During the “coronavirus” shortages at grocery stores, this has actually become easier, because the organic stuff is the last to sell out. I also recently made a drive to Plano just to buy raw milk, which I had only ever tried once in the past and I don’t remember why I hadn’t kept on going. This was literally the tastiest, yummiest milk I’ve ever had.

    I am really really excited about my newfound health options. I have a supplement I do take, called Rain Soul. And I have my bone broth. And I am also studying herbalism. And making fermentation starters, home made organic sourdough, and other fermented foods.

    Back to what my experiment is though. For years, I was pretty much convinced I was lactose intolerant. But when I drank the raw or the organic, unfortified (unpoisoned by cholecalciferol) milk, my stomach doesn’t even get upset AT ALL. So I think that as long as I don’t get cholecalciferol in my body, I won’t experience stomach upset at dairy. One of the easy ways to find these products is to look for imports. Only in America it seems, do we poison all our food.

    Some things I learned about the food supply over the past year.

    1. Folic acid causes gene mutations. Folate does not. Folic acid was the root cause of the MTHFR gene mutation. MTHFR causes people to be unable to metabolize certain drugs or vaccines, leading to chemical sensitivity and drug reactions that can lead to death.
    2. Certain prenatal vitamins have been contaminated with large amounts of lead, and even my midwives had me on the brands that did this. Come to find out, that brand was bought by Clorox. Yuck. They got sued recently for doing this. Too late for me to benefit, but at least I could stop taking them.
    3. Cholecalciferol has been in the news for killing dogs. It’s literal rat poison, the way that fluoride is rat poison, the way that you don’t feed your kids rat poison gummies (oh but wait, many of you do). It also increases the absorption of heavy metals in the brain.
    4. The rapid gene mutations occurring in society, coupled with heavy absorption of heavy metals from various sources (food additives like HFCS, vitamins, chocolate, to name a few) mean we aren’t safe to be taking pharmaceuticals even if perhaps in the past, we were.
    5. There are much safer methodologies for staying healthy, and they just take a tiny amount of effort, like careful shopping and being willing to abstain from something. I find that adding the healthy things to my diet and routine cost me no extra pain or suffering, I just simply have to make wiser choices.

    There is one food based supplement, based on seed nutrition, that I think is a replacement for what I used to tell people would be a cure for bipolar based on studies. A study claimed that 14 tabs a day was the cure. While I used to recommend (and take) Omega 3, or Omega 369, (I took it for general health and for pregnancy health, as I am not a bipolar sufferer) this product is actually far superior to anything I’ve ever taken in supplement form before. I’ve seen it cure a woman of severe depression and take away a man’s asthma. It’s based on whole food nutrition from seeds, and there’s no down side whatsoever. The properties of the seeds in the drink are extreme amounts of anti-inflammatory action, as well as other general health benefits. It was once said that one of the main ingredients, black cumin seeds, “cures everything except death.” Here is my testimonial video on that. Here is where you can go to order, and if you have questions, you can email me at chloemaisiesmom@gmail.com. https://myrainlife.com/amyjames

  • Psychology Today: Retract the article “Benzo Hysteria”

    Petition by

    Nancy Rubenstein Del Giudice

    Benzodiazapine withdrawal has been documented to be forty times harder to withdraw from than heroin, and many people are  disabled for years from protracted withdrawal syndromes. In Britain this is recognized as a public health epidemic. This article suggests that these drugs are safe and non-addictive.

    Click here to go to petitin site.