Log InRegister
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreOur ScienceMindat Newsletter [Free Download]Contact Us
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageCorporate SponsorshipSponsored Pages
Learning CenterWhat Is a Mineral?The Most Common Minerals on EarthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesMindat Newsletter [Free Download]The ElementsThe Mineral Quiz
Search FormMinerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDMinerals by CountryAlphabetical Mineral IndexAlphabetical Locality SearchMineral Association SearchList of CountriesLocalities Near MePhoto SearchSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
MineralsPetrologyFossilsMeteoritesGeologic Time
Mining CompaniesStatisticsMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsDevice SettingsTime Machine
Read DiscussionsIdentification Request
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColourPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Magniotriplite

A variety of Wagnerite
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About MagniotripliteHide

Formula:
(Mg,Fe2+,Mn2+)2PO4F
Colour:
Reddish-brown.
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
4
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named in 1951 by Ginzburg et al. for the supposed relation to triplite.
A discredited iron- and magnesium-rich structural variety (polytype) of wagnerite.

Originally described from Karasu granite pegmatite, Turkestan Range, Osh Oblast, Kyrgyzstan and Kyrk-Bulak granite pegmatite, Turkestan Range, Osh Oblast, Kyrgyzstan.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
2540 (as Magniotriplite)
4229 (as Wagnerite)
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:2540:5 (as Magniotriplite)
mindat:1:1:4229:7 (as Wagnerite)

IMA Classification of MagniotripliteHide

Discredited

Classification of MagniotripliteHide

41.6.1.3

41 : ANHYDROUS PHOSPHATES, ETC.CONTAINING HYDROXYL OR HALOGEN
6 : A2(XO4)Zq
22.1.24

22 : Phosphates, Arsenates or Vanadates with other Anions
1 : Phosphates, arsenates or vanadates with fluoride

Physical Properties of MagniotripliteHide

Vitreous
Colour:
Reddish-brown.
Hardness:

Optical Data of MagniotripliteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.641 nβ = 1.649 nγ = 1.661
2V:
Measured: 60° , Calculated: 80°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.020
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
relatively weak

Chemistry of MagniotripliteHide

Mindat Formula:
(Mg,Fe2+,Mn2+)2PO4F
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O39.364 %
Mg29.899 %
P19.051 %
F11.686 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
Mg
P
F

Crystallography of MagniotripliteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Cell Parameters:
a = 11.92 Å, b = 12.27 Å, c = 9.66 Å
β = 107.18°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.971 : 1 : 0.787
Unit Cell V:
1,349.82 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)

Synonyms of MagniotripliteHide

Other Language Names for MagniotripliteHide

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for MagniotripliteHide

References for MagniotripliteHide

Localities for MagniotripliteHide

Showing 10 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Australia
 
  • South Australia
    • Pastoral Unincorporated Area
      • Bimbowrie Conservation Park
Lottermoser et al. (1997)
Kyrgyzstan
 
  • Batken Region
    • Leylek District
[DAN-SSSR (1951) +2 other references
    • Turkestan Ridge
Pekov (1998)
Russia
 
  • Sakha
    • Verkhoyansk District
      • Yana River Basin
        • Yana-Adycha Region
Trunilina et al. (2024)
Spain
 
  • Castile and Leon
    • Salamanca
      • Aldehuela de la Bóveda
Roda et al. (2001)
      • Garcirrey
Roda et al. (2004) +1 other reference
  • Catalonia
    • Girona
      • Alt Empordà
        • Cadaqués
Bareche (2005)
& locality references +1 other reference
Sweden
 
  • Stockholm County
    • Haninge
Wik et al. (2005)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: October 29, 2026 09:21:33 Page updated: October 12, 2026 19:53:36
Go to top of page