Sonar Used Before Whales Hit Shore

美国海军承认在夏威夷海域鲸鱼搁浅前20小时内曾使用声纳,此前说法与此次不同。海军仍否认声纳与鲸鱼异常行为有关,但新信息引发质疑。海军强调声纳训练必要,而此前也有多起声纳使用与海洋哺乳动物搁浅事件相关。

Sonar Used Before Whales Hit Shore

Navy Changes Story but Still Denies Responsibility

By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 31, 2004; Page A03

The Navy has acknowledged that vessels on maneuver off Hawaii last month used their sonar periodically in the 20 hours before a large pod of melon-headed whales unexpectedly came to shore in the area. The acknowledgment added to an already contentious debate over whether the sound from sonar has been causing marine mammals to strand.

Navy officials said that a review of the July 3 incident indicates that two ships turned on their sonar between 6:45 and 7:10 a.m., by most accounts just before the unusual movement of almost 200 deep-water whales to the shoreline of a Kauai bay. The Navy had said earlier that no sonar was used until more than 90 minutes later, well after the animals came ashore.

Lt. Cmdr. Greg Geisen, the Navy spokesman responsible for information about the maneuver, said a Navy review of the incident still concluded that the ships were either too far from the whales or were using the sonar at the wrong time to cause the mass movement.

"There is no evidence of a relationship here between the sonar use and the whale behavior," he said.

But the newly released information from Geisen and other Navy officials -- that the ships were testing their sonar in preparation for the maneuver on the day before the whales came ashore, and early on the morning of the near-stranding -- has caused some observers to question that conclusion.

"Every time the Navy changes its story, it reduces its credibility on this issue," said Cara Horowitz, a lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council, which has sued the Navy over a related sonar issue. "The Navy would be better off spending more time developing commonsense ways to protect whales from sonar and less time denying a connection that is unfortunately been repeatedly shown."

Officials at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which is looking into the incident, said it remains uncertain what caused the near-stranding.

"At this point, we still know very little about what might have made those whales behave so unusually," said Donna Wieting, chief of the Marine Mammal Conservation Division of NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service.

"But saying that sonar played no role might be a premature determination," she said. "Even if we can't establish a clear cause and effect, we're having these coincidences [of unusual and sometimes deadly] marine mammal behavior around sonar, and we have to ask why."

Some marine mammals come to shore naturally, because they are following a sick lead animal or trying to avoid predators and such natural occurrences as potentially harmful red tides. Melon-headed whales are relatively small and highly social animals that normally live in deep waters, at least 15 miles from shore. Wildlife officials said it is highly unusual for such a large number of them to come to shore as they did on July 3, although there is one report of a similar mass movement in the 1850s.

The new Navy information about when the sonar was used off Hawaii was first made public in late July, at a meeting of the federal Marine Mammal Commission focused on how to limit the effects of ocean noise on whales and other sea creatures. Rear Adm. Steven Tomaszeski updated the information then, and said the Navy had concluded there was no connection between the sonar use and the unusual whale behavior.

He and Geisen said the July 2 sonar use could not have caused the whales to head into Hanalei Bay because the ships -- four Japanese and two American -- were too far away when the equipment was used. Geisen also said the Navy first learned of the stranding from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) at 5:30 a.m. on July 3, and not between 7 and 7:30 a.m., as earlier reported, making it impossible for the 6:45 to 7:10 a.m. sonar usage to have harmed the whales.

Wieting of NMFS said, however, that her office has received no reports of a 5:30 sighting, and still believes the whales were first seen after 7 a.m.

Navy officials are adamant about the need for sonar training. They say there is a substantial and growing threat from "quiet" diesel submarines that could menace the United States from coastal waters, and that only active sonar use can detect them. The Navy is planning a sonar training ground in the Atlantic Ocean, off the Carolinas.

Residents and government officials worked throughout July 3 to steer the whales back to open water, and all made it except one newborn calf that died of starvation. Officials say that some of the animals may have died at sea without a trace.

The Hawaii incident is the third significant one involving sonar and marine mammal strandings near the United States since 2000. The stranding of 17 whales of various kinds off the Bahamas in 2000, which resulted in the death of at least six of them, occurred during a major Navy maneuver. Navy officials at first said there was no connection between their exercise and the stranding, but later acknowledged that the loud sound from the sonar had caused the animals to flee ashore.

Another incident occurred off the coast of Washington state last year, where harbor porpoises unexpectedly came ashore after a sonar exercise. The Navy concluded that there was no connection between the two, but NOAA is still reviewing the incident.

The International Whaling Commission said in a report last month that there is "compelling evidence" that Navy sonar is harming some species of whales, but Navy officials dismissed the conclusion as "unscientific."


contentious [con'ten·tious || -??s]
(形) 好争吵的, 有异议的, 爱争论的

strand [strænd]
n. fibers or filaments twisted together to form a rope (or thread, yarn, etc.); string of pearls or beads; single fiber or filament; lock of hair; shore, beach, land alongside a body of water
 
v. drive up onto the shore; be driven onto the shore; leave someone in a difficult situation; be stuck in a difficult situation

was adamant 
was decisive, did not give up
 
adamant [ad·a·mant || 'æd?m?nt]
adj. unyielding, firm, immovable; hard

porpoise [por·poise || 'p?rp?s /'p??-]
n. species of dolphin, type of marine

代码转载自:https://pan.quark.cn/s/8ce4326d996e 对于在 CentOS 7 系统中修改网卡配置文件后无法使设置生效的情况,经过实践验证,可以通过使用 nmcli 命令来进行调整。完成修改之后,需要重新启动虚拟机以使更改生效,这样操作流程即告完成。如果设置仍然无法生效,则表明虚拟机在启动过程中所获取的 IP 地址配置并非针对 eth0,此时可以对其它网卡的配置文件进行修改或将其移除。在 CentOS 7 系统中,网络配置的管理机制与早期版本存在差异,主要体现为采用了 Network Manager 服务来负责网络接口的管理。在某些情形下,尽管修改了 `/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts` 目录下的 `ifcfg-eth0` 文件,但网络配置却未能即时生效。此类问题的发生通常源于 CentOS 7 采用了不同于以往的配置读取方法。接下来将具体阐述如何借助 nmcli 命令来处理这一挑战。 以 root 用户身份登录系统并打开终端界面。nmcli 是 Network Manager 提供的命令行界面工具,它支持在命令行环境下执行网络连接的建立、编辑、查询及管理任务。针对修改 eth0 网卡配置的需求,可以遵循以下步骤进行操作: 1. 导航至 `/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts` 目录: ``` cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts ``` 2. 检查该目录内是否存在 `ifcfg-eth0.bak` 文件,该备份文件可能是先前调整配置时遗留下来的,若存在可能造成冲突。若发现该文件,可以选择将其删除: ``` [root@localhost netw...
代码转载自:https://pan.quark.cn/s/46fd08fb879c 网管教程 从入门到精通软件篇 ★一。★详尽的xp修复控制台指令及其应用!!! 放入xp(2000)的光盘,安装时选择R,执行修复! Windows XP(涵盖 Windows 2000)的控制台指令是在系统遭遇某些意外状况时的一种极具效用的诊断、检测以及恢复系统功能的工具。笔者确实一直期望能够将这方面的指令进行归纳,此次由老范辛苦整理了这份极具价值的秘籍。 Bootcfg bootcfg 命令用于启动配置与故障恢复(对大多数计算机而言,即 boot.ini 文件)。 带有特定参数的 bootcfg 命令仅在运用故障恢复控制台时方可使用。能够在命令行界面下运用带有不同参数的 bootcfg 命令。 用法: bootcfg /default 设定默认引导选项。 bootcfg /add 向引导清单中增添 Windows 安装。 bootcfg /rebuild 重复整个 Windows 安装流程并让用户选择需添加的项目。 注意:运用 bootcfg /rebuild 之前,应先借助 bootcfg /copy 命令备份 boot.ini 文件。 bootcfg /scan 探查用于 Windows 安装的全部磁盘并展示结果。 注意:这些结果被静态存储,并用于当前会话。若在当前会话期间磁盘配置发生变动,为获取更新的探查结果,必须先重启计算机,然后再次探查磁盘。 bootcfg /list 列示引导清单中已有的项目。 bootcfg /disableredirect 在启动引导程序中禁用重定向。 bootcfg /redirect [ PortBaudRrate] |[ useBio...
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值