[图解]DDD领域驱动设计浮夸，Eric Evans开了个坏头

0
00:00:00,630 --> 00:00:02,790
今天我们要讲的是

1
00:00:03,930 --> 00:00:07,420
DDD领域驱动设计浮夸

2
00:00:07,700 --> 00:00:10,590
Eric Evans开了个坏头

3
00:00:14,790 --> 00:00:17,380
在《领域驱动设计》的

4
00:00:18,650 --> 00:00:22,590
前言，也就是这本书的正文

5
00:00:23,750 --> 00:00:23,962

6
00:00:23,962 --> 00:00:26,092
Eric Evans写的第一句话

7
00:00:26,092 --> 00:00:28,647
他就说了这么一段话

8
00:00:28,647 --> 00:00:30,350

9
00:00:30,350 --> 00:00:32,480
翻译起来就是这个意思

10
00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:34,690
意思是什么

11
00:00:35,310 --> 00:00:36,787
至少20年

12
00:00:36,787 --> 00:00:39,496
一直没有人写点什么

13
00:00:39,496 --> 00:00:42,205
关于领域建模设计

14
00:00:42,205 --> 00:00:43,190
没写什么

15
00:00:43,470 --> 00:00:43,803

16
00:00:43,803 --> 00:00:46,803
一直到他这个哲学

17
00:00:46,803 --> 00:00:47,470

18
00:00:48,100 --> 00:00:49,465
暗流

19
00:00:49,465 --> 00:00:51,970
出现，领域驱动设计

20
00:00:53,620 --> 00:00:53,985

21
00:00:53,985 --> 00:00:57,270
这是他写在书上的

22
00:00:57,550 --> 00:00:59,880
他本人写的第一句话

23
00:01:02,590 --> 00:01:04,094
那至少20年

24
00:01:04,094 --> 00:01:09,109
这本书是写于2003年，出版于2003年

25
00:01:09,109 --> 00:01:09,360

26
00:01:09,870 --> 00:01:11,275
按Evans说的

27
00:01:11,275 --> 00:01:12,680
就是

28
00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:16,200
前面20年是

29
00:01:16,200 --> 00:01:18,760
1983年到2002年

30
00:01:20,510 --> 00:01:22,210
几乎没有人写什么

31
00:01:25,290 --> 00:01:26,520
是这样的吗

32
00:01:27,100 --> 00:01:27,313

33
00:01:27,313 --> 00:01:28,594
一想就不是嘛

34
00:01:28,594 --> 00:01:29,234
对不对

35
00:01:29,234 --> 00:01:31,368
否则UML怎么来的

36
00:01:31,368 --> 00:01:33,290
UML就是因为什么

37
00:01:33,700 --> 00:01:37,620
各种各样的建模方法学太多了

38
00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:38,656

39
00:01:38,656 --> 00:01:40,170
不止面向对象的

40
00:01:40,170 --> 00:01:41,900
还有面向过程的

41
00:01:42,270 --> 00:01:44,234
UML里面的活动图

42
00:01:44,234 --> 00:01:45,020
这个就是

43
00:01:45,560 --> 00:01:48,183
改善的是面向过程

44
00:01:48,183 --> 00:01:50,330
包括数据流等等

45
00:01:52,050 --> 00:01:54,518
太多了，才要统一符号

46
00:01:54,518 --> 00:01:55,864
统一表示法嘛

47
00:01:55,864 --> 00:01:56,537
对不对

48
00:01:56,537 --> 00:01:59,230
你看，这是《UML参考手册》上

49
00:01:59,510 --> 00:02:00,980
介绍的历史

50
00:02:01,680 --> 00:02:02,440
另外

51
00:02:03,420 --> 00:02:05,713
只要大家去翻以前的书

52
00:02:05,713 --> 00:02:08,007
介绍这个UML怎么来的

53
00:02:08,007 --> 00:02:10,510
基本上都会有讲这个问题

54
00:02:13,670 --> 00:02:15,256
你看，这里说的

55
00:02:15,256 --> 00:02:16,390
大把的这个

56
00:02:17,010 --> 00:02:18,652
书籍面世

57
00:02:18,652 --> 00:02:18,926

58
00:02:18,926 --> 00:02:22,760
一堆一堆

59
00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:29,270
大家也可以用这些关键词去搜嘛

60
00:02:29,740 --> 00:02:31,492
你到亚马逊也好

61
00:02:31,492 --> 00:02:33,465
到哪个国外的书店

62
00:02:33,465 --> 00:02:37,190
去搜1983到2002年时间段

63
00:02:37,670 --> 00:02:39,030
出了哪些书

64
00:02:39,450 --> 00:02:39,658

65
00:02:39,658 --> 00:02:41,955
如果你要搜论文就更多了

66
00:02:41,955 --> 00:02:42,582
对不对

67
00:02:42,582 --> 00:02:44,670
你光搜书都可以的

68
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,617
下面我们列一些书上的图

69
00:02:50,617 --> 00:02:56,070
你可以把它跟现在的各种DDD文章里面的各种发明对比

70
00:02:56,750 --> 00:02:59,800
看哪个里面的逻辑更复杂

71
00:03:03,170 --> 00:03:03,434

72
00:03:03,434 --> 00:03:05,020
这是90年的

73
00:03:05,300 --> 00:03:06,370
这是

74
00:03:06,850 --> 00:03:08,810
Coad和Yourdon

75
00:03:09,090 --> 00:03:09,730

76
00:03:10,490 --> 00:03:12,950
也就是OOA/OOD方法学

77
00:03:13,420 --> 00:03:15,130
书里面一张类图

78
00:03:16,660 --> 00:03:17,230

79
00:03:20,070 --> 00:03:23,601
你看，这里就把类图画成了若干个主题

80
00:03:23,601 --> 00:03:24,264
对不对

81
00:03:24,264 --> 00:03:24,484

82
00:03:24,484 --> 00:03:26,030
分割成若干主题

83
00:03:30,690 --> 00:03:32,681
这本书有中译本

84
00:03:32,681 --> 00:03:34,672
北大出版社出版的

85
00:03:34,672 --> 00:03:37,660
也是1992年左右翻译的

86
00:03:41,220 --> 00:03:43,810
这个是Rumbaugh

87
00:03:44,190 --> 00:03:44,405

88
00:03:44,405 --> 00:03:50,430
Rumbaugh就是UML三个人里面的一个，1991年的这本书

89
00:03:50,430 --> 00:03:52,797
这个书好像没有中译本

90
00:03:52,797 --> 00:03:54,518
我找了没找到

91
00:03:54,518 --> 00:03:55,810
应该是没有的

92
00:03:56,130 --> 00:03:56,351

93
00:03:56,351 --> 00:03:58,344
你看这里面，类图对吧

94
00:03:58,344 --> 00:03:59,230
这是类图

95
00:04:00,270 --> 00:04:01,440
状态图

96
00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:02,782

97
00:04:02,782 --> 00:04:03,930
状态图

98
00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:11,978
这是92年

99
00:04:11,978 --> 00:04:13,670
这个是

100
00:04:14,060 --> 00:04:14,420

101
00:04:14,420 --> 00:04:15,140
Shaler

102
00:04:15,140 --> 00:04:16,580
还有Mellor

103
00:04:16,580 --> 00:04:19,460
这个应该是

104
00:04:22,750 --> 00:04:23,930
1992年

105
00:04:25,190 --> 00:04:26,620
的方法学

106
00:04:26,900 --> 00:04:29,540
他主要是以这个

107
00:04:29,820 --> 00:04:31,550
类图和状态图

108
00:04:32,060 --> 00:04:35,940
作为主要的建模方法

109
00:04:36,390 --> 00:04:36,638

110
00:04:36,638 --> 00:04:38,871
这是他画的状态图

111
00:04:38,871 --> 00:04:41,104
你看是方框

112
00:04:41,104 --> 00:04:43,090
实际上是状态

113
00:04:44,470 --> 00:04:46,196
你看，这个状态的命名

114
00:04:46,196 --> 00:04:46,580
你看

115
00:04:47,510 --> 00:04:51,220
是现在分词，或者是过去分词

116
00:04:51,590 --> 00:04:52,220

117
00:04:55,950 --> 00:04:59,433
像现在很多各种各样

118
00:04:59,433 --> 00:05:01,175
他也画一个状态图

119
00:05:01,175 --> 00:05:03,134
结果出来是一个动词

120
00:05:03,134 --> 00:05:03,352

121
00:05:03,352 --> 00:05:05,093
甚至有的是名词

122
00:05:05,093 --> 00:05:06,400
那这个瞎搞了

123
00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:11,562
那95年

124
00:05:11,562 --> 00:05:13,550
这个是Coad的这个书

125
00:05:13,550 --> 00:05:17,525
那这个书，英文我就没找着了

126
00:05:17,525 --> 00:05:20,010
我找了一个中译本的

127
00:05:22,630 --> 00:05:25,200
你看，它里面列了很多很多案例

128
00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:28,202
包括怎么样分析的，对不对

129
00:05:28,202 --> 00:05:30,430
你看，这是销售的，对吧

130
00:05:31,950 --> 00:05:33,210
这个书有中译本

131
00:05:33,210 --> 00:05:35,010
大家可以去找来看看

132
00:05:36,430 --> 00:05:36,696

133
00:05:36,696 --> 00:05:37,760
类图

134
00:05:40,760 --> 00:05:41,626
Coad

135
00:05:41,626 --> 00:05:45,960
还有这个很有名的了，彩色建模

136
00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:49,426
里面列了很多领域的类图

137
00:05:49,426 --> 00:05:51,160
序列图等等

138
00:05:53,750 --> 00:05:55,640
这个也有中译本

139
00:05:57,360 --> 00:05:57,654

140
00:05:57,654 --> 00:05:59,421
是我们翻译的

141
00:05:59,421 --> 00:06:00,600
大家可以

142
00:06:01,040 --> 00:06:02,160
找来看看

143
00:06:04,950 --> 00:06:08,240
那前面讲的就是面向对象建模了

144
00:06:09,500 --> 00:06:11,873
如果不限于面向对象的

145
00:06:11,873 --> 00:06:13,060
那就更多了

146
00:06:13,340 --> 00:06:13,730

147
00:06:13,730 --> 00:06:14,900
比如说

148
00:06:15,580 --> 00:06:17,060
这是90年的

149
00:06:17,930 --> 00:06:19,451
实际上更早的都有

150
00:06:19,451 --> 00:06:20,060
因为

151
00:06:20,980 --> 00:06:23,590
像实体关系图，类似的

152
00:06:23,870 --> 00:06:25,225
七十年代就有了

153
00:06:25,225 --> 00:06:25,733
对不对

154
00:06:25,733 --> 00:06:26,580
但是因为

155
00:06:27,180 --> 00:06:27,400

156
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:28,940
Evans刚才说的是

157
00:06:29,330 --> 00:06:29,525

158
00:06:29,525 --> 00:06:30,700
二十年以来嘛

159
00:06:30,700 --> 00:06:34,420
那就是1983到2002嘛

160
00:06:34,420 --> 00:06:36,770
我们就特地选了这个地方

161
00:06:38,160 --> 00:06:42,420
像90年这个，这个叫Teorey

162
00:06:42,420 --> 00:06:44,550
Teorey这个

163
00:06:45,090 --> 00:06:46,350
这个是

164
00:06:47,610 --> 00:06:50,220
数据库建模，他用的是E/R图

165
00:06:52,830 --> 00:06:54,590
你看，右边这个图

166
00:06:57,930 --> 00:07:00,990
那96年，就是Hay这个

167
00:07:02,420 --> 00:07:04,990
这是也用的是

168
00:07:05,330 --> 00:07:07,140
鸦脚的图

169
00:07:08,200 --> 00:07:11,000
也是E/R图的一个变体

170
00:07:13,290 --> 00:07:14,760
你看，这是一个

171
00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:15,950
开支的

172
00:07:16,410 --> 00:07:16,725

173
00:07:16,725 --> 00:07:18,300
开支的一个

174
00:07:19,070 --> 00:07:22,310
一个领域的模型

175
00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:25,960
这本书

176
00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:26,453

177
00:07:26,453 --> 00:07:28,370
实际上就是以

178
00:07:29,710 --> 00:07:32,040
E/R图来描述的

179
00:07:33,690 --> 00:07:36,630
分析模式的归纳

180
00:07:37,140 --> 00:07:38,816
它出版比分析模式

181
00:07:38,816 --> 00:07:39,188
Martin Fowler

182
00:07:39,188 --> 00:07:41,610
那个《分析模式》要早一点点

183
00:07:41,980 --> 00:07:42,212

184
00:07:42,212 --> 00:07:48,023
Fowler分析模式那本书的序言里面就有提到这个书

185
00:07:48,023 --> 00:07:49,650
但是因为这本书

186
00:07:50,660 --> 00:07:52,182
他不是Fowler写的

187
00:07:52,182 --> 00:07:54,140
没有在这个圈子里面

188
00:07:54,610 --> 00:07:56,650
所以呢，大家都不知道

189
00:07:57,000 --> 00:07:57,910
因为

190
00:07:58,190 --> 00:07:59,263
我们之前说过

191
00:07:59,263 --> 00:08:01,052
他圈子里面互相引用

192
00:08:01,052 --> 00:08:03,020
他只引用自己圈子里面的

193
00:08:04,130 --> 00:08:06,476
圈子外的他不引用

194
00:08:06,476 --> 00:08:07,780
或者说，他会

195
00:08:08,180 --> 00:08:09,142
包装一下

196
00:08:09,142 --> 00:08:12,990
由一个圈子里面的人来包装一下再引用

197
00:08:13,870 --> 00:08:14,986
这种手法

198
00:08:14,986 --> 00:08:18,707
我们之前的视频和文章已经提到过很多次了

199
00:08:18,707 --> 00:08:20,940
大家感兴趣可以找我的文章

200
00:08:24,070 --> 00:08:25,093
前面讲的

201
00:08:25,093 --> 00:08:26,525
不管是面向对象

202
00:08:26,525 --> 00:08:27,344
面向过程

203
00:08:27,344 --> 00:08:29,800
都是说软件开发为目的

204
00:08:30,080 --> 00:08:32,492
如果不限于软件开发

205
00:08:32,492 --> 00:08:36,780
仅仅是对领域做描述的这种领域工程

206
00:08:37,060 --> 00:08:38,800
那就还有更多了

207
00:08:39,970 --> 00:08:42,070
那这方面的话

208
00:08:42,830 --> 00:08:45,254
我就不是很擅长了

209
00:08:45,254 --> 00:08:47,140
但是大家可以去

210
00:08:47,550 --> 00:08:49,550
找这相关的

211
00:08:50,350 --> 00:08:53,436
按照关键词搜相关内容

212
00:08:53,436 --> 00:08:54,840
那我这里就

213
00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:56,570
借花献佛

214
00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:02,143
我就用了一个

215
00:09:02,143 --> 00:09:05,660
我在网络上搜到的一个幻灯片

216
00:09:06,190 --> 00:09:06,475

217
00:09:06,475 --> 00:09:08,190
来展示一下

218
00:09:08,700 --> 00:09:11,087
大家也可以去按这个搜

219
00:09:11,087 --> 00:09:12,740
好几个地方有下载的

220
00:09:13,970 --> 00:09:15,600
你看，他说

221
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:16,197

222
00:09:16,197 --> 00:09:18,964
80年代初期开始了什么什么什么

223
00:09:18,964 --> 00:09:19,360

224
00:09:19,710 --> 00:09:22,713
提出了什么什么什么

225
00:09:22,713 --> 00:09:24,624
有很多成果

226
00:09:24,624 --> 00:09:27,900
有这个这个这个这个这个

227
00:09:28,580 --> 00:09:29,230

228
00:09:33,690 --> 00:09:34,257
然后呢

229
00:09:34,257 --> 00:09:35,960
下面说这个这个这个

230
00:09:36,780 --> 00:09:37,032

231
00:09:37,032 --> 00:09:39,302
你看这80年代的

232
00:09:39,302 --> 00:09:41,320
80年代提出来的

233
00:09:45,860 --> 00:09:46,910
所以呢

234
00:09:49,470 --> 00:09:50,850
Evans说的

235
00:09:51,600 --> 00:09:53,590
几乎没有人写点什么

236
00:09:53,870 --> 00:09:54,100

237
00:09:54,100 --> 00:09:55,250
这是错的

238
00:09:56,220 --> 00:09:59,020
把前面20年描述成荒漠

239
00:09:59,560 --> 00:10:03,720
为领域驱动设计营造出横空出世的感觉

240
00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:05,760
这是一种夸大

241
00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:10,739
我们前面列出的资料

242
00:10:10,739 --> 00:10:11,050
Evans 

243
00:10:11,370 --> 00:10:12,550
没有提到

244
00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:14,570
他唯一提到的一本

245
00:10:14,850 --> 00:10:17,115
就是Martin Fowler的分析模式

246
00:10:17,115 --> 00:10:19,380
那我们前面故意就没有提

247
00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:24,475
到底是一无所知，还是刻意忽略

248
00:10:24,475 --> 00:10:25,700
这就不得而知了

249
00:10:25,700 --> 00:10:27,800
但是我前面已经提到很多次

250
00:10:28,180 --> 00:10:30,866
圈子内的封闭引用

251
00:10:30,866 --> 00:10:32,060
这是一个

252
00:10:32,340 --> 00:10:34,060
很大的问题

253
00:10:39,500 --> 00:10:40,370
那么

254
00:10:40,650 --> 00:10:42,589
我历来的评价是这样

255
00:10:42,589 --> 00:10:45,175
你看，2009年我写的文章

256
00:10:45,175 --> 00:10:47,330
这是发在《程序员》杂志上

257
00:10:48,670 --> 00:10:49,930
我们是

258
00:10:50,460 --> 00:10:52,470
国内最早的

259
00:10:52,750 --> 00:10:53,991
接触到这个

260
00:10:53,991 --> 00:10:57,508
然后引进来，向大家介绍的，包括书什么的

261
00:10:57,508 --> 00:10:59,370
最先也是我们做的嘛

262
00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:01,621
所以呢

263
00:11:01,621 --> 00:11:04,930
你看，我当时说什么，起到了一个什么

264
00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:09,050
拨乱反正的作用，对不对

265
00:11:09,330 --> 00:11:10,300
这个地方

266
00:11:12,570 --> 00:11:15,126
并没有说他是什么伟大的创新

267
00:11:15,126 --> 00:11:16,503
本来就是这样

268
00:11:16,503 --> 00:11:19,060
你看，最开始就是这样的，对吧

269
00:11:19,340 --> 00:11:20,530
后来

270
00:11:20,860 --> 00:11:22,990
受到各种冲击

271
00:11:23,420 --> 00:11:24,968
因为这样比较难

272
00:11:24,968 --> 00:11:30,720
后来就有人去推销各种各样拍脑袋的做法

273
00:11:32,370 --> 00:11:33,950
就把它带偏掉了

274
00:11:34,770 --> 00:11:36,247
包括现在都是一样

275
00:11:36,247 --> 00:11:37,910
很多人就会这个

276
00:11:38,190 --> 00:11:39,170
就会这个

277
00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:41,288
他写面向对象建模

278
00:11:41,288 --> 00:11:44,770
他就写这个，下面这个什么SRP、OCP这个

279
00:11:45,260 --> 00:11:47,026
你让他复杂点，他不会的

280
00:11:47,026 --> 00:11:48,263
他就会念叨这个

281
00:11:48,263 --> 00:11:49,853
以为这个就有用了

282
00:11:49,853 --> 00:11:50,560
没用的

283
00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:55,583
你看，我说的拨乱反正

284
00:11:55,583 --> 00:11:56,020
对吧

285
00:11:57,200 --> 00:11:58,804
本来这没有什么

286
00:11:58,804 --> 00:12:01,812
那为什么近年我就开始批评这个呢

287
00:12:01,812 --> 00:12:04,620
因为到2017或2018左右

288
00:12:05,150 --> 00:12:08,840
突然就被包装成革命性的创造

289
00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:11,161
划时代的洞见

290
00:12:11,161 --> 00:12:14,370
巨人等等，就被包装出来

291
00:12:15,780 --> 00:12:16,830
所以呢

292
00:12:17,450 --> 00:12:19,520
我才会去批评他

 

0
00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:03,351
Evans的书有没有问题呢

1
00:00:03,351 --> 00:00:07,814
有的，主要问题就是我们前面说过很多遍的

2
00:00:07,814 --> 00:00:09,600
他只有D的知识

3
00:00:09,890 --> 00:00:12,083
然后从D的角度去臆想

4
00:00:12,083 --> 00:00:13,280
ABC的知识

5
00:00:15,580 --> 00:00:17,400
但是呢

6
00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:19,396
如果是低调的

7
00:00:19,396 --> 00:00:20,950
没有故意渲染

8
00:00:22,070 --> 00:00:24,160
那么，也没有必要去批评他

9
00:00:25,950 --> 00:00:29,650
但是如果说，被人有意无意利用

10
00:00:29,930 --> 00:00:31,140
来包装

11
00:00:31,620 --> 00:00:34,480
那这个就有批评的必要了