Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Trump At The G7

For a man who has trouble staying awake on camera these days, Donald Trump is really pushing the envelope. After staying up into the wee hours celebrating his birthday last Sunday at the UFC spectacle on the White House lawn, our 80-year-old president hopped on a plane to France for his sixth meeting of the G7. He arrived bearing a “memorandum of understanding” between the U.S. and Iran’s governing regime that supposedly opens the Strait of Hormuz and extends the current ceasefire for another 60 days while the parties hammer out a hypothetical long-term agreement to end hostilities.

According to a draft of the agreement read aloud to White House reporters on Wednesday, the agreement would also somehow bring an end to Israel’s war in Lebanon, create a reconstruction fund of $300 billion for Iran, lift all sanctions on Iranian oil and push discussion of its nuclear program into future negotiations. Some Republican senators have already expressed misgivings, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he won’t be bound by this agreement, so it’s very hard to tell what this actually means.

Trump really looks worn out. On Tuesday, he appeared to have forgotten his usual bronze makeup, which was a startling sight. His energy is notably low, especially for a gathering like this one; meetings with Europeans usually turn him combative and hostile. Back in 2017, he announced his presence on the world stage by lecturing European leaders about their failure to “pay their dues” to NATO and accusing them of unfair trade practices. In other first-term trips, he was generous and gracious to the presidents of Russia and China, making it abundantly clear who he respected and who he didn’t.

At the G7 meeting in Quebec in 2018, Trump demanded that Russia be allowed to rejoin the group. (Vladimir Putin had been 86’d after the invasion of Crimea in 2014.) After being rebuffed on that front, Trump stormed off to canoodle with another favorite world leader, North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, with whom he announced he had fallen in love. The following year, 2019, was uneventful by comparison because the Europeans showered him with flattery. That was when he announced that a committee had looked at venues for the next year’s meeting in the U.S., and had — imagine this! —decided that the best possible option was his Doral golf resort in Florida. That act of self-dealing was so blatant he was actually forced to walk it back and schedule the meeting at Camp David instead. Perhaps fortunately, the pandemic forced the entire G7 event to be canceled in 2020.

Last year’s return to the world stage was very bad indeed. Trump stormed into Canada high on his “landslide” victory (with 49.8% of the vote) and insulted everyone, hurling threats of tariffs and otherwise making clear that he had no use for any of America’s so-called allies. Once again, he bailed out early, supposedly to devote his magic dealmaking skills to ending the fighting between Israel and Iran. That clearly did not happen.

It’s abundantly clear that Trump is still smarting from Western leaders’ collective refusal to follow him into that misbegotten war. If he weren’t so visibly exhausted, he’d probably be a lot more belligerent.

Since then, several more events have soured the relationship between the U.S. and its allies to the point where they are scarcely allies at all. Trump’s outrageous “Independence Day” tariffs, his abandonment of Ukraine and his crude, dismissive treatment of Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, his outrageous U.N. speech and his threats to seize Greenland by force have finally moved the Europeans to realize that America is unstable and they need to look after themselves. That understanding was validated just a couple of weeks ago when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth went to Normandy and proceeded to stomp all over the alliance’s finest moment by insulting Europe on D-Day and then announcing that the U.S. will pull thousands more troops off the continent.

The biggest issue facing the summit this year is the economic upheaval caused by the war in Iran, which will continue far into the future whether or not the war itself is over. Like it or not, that illustrates how interconnected the world still is. All the G7 leaders were relieved that something has been agreed upon that may mean ships can once again pass safely through the Strait of Hormuz. It’s abundantly clear that Trump is still smarting from Western leaders’ collective refusal to follow him into that misbegotten war. If he weren’t so visibly exhausted, he’d probably be a lot more belligerent. As it is, he’s spending his time hyping this deal as the conclusion of a narrative that casts him as a big hero. But between his diminished energy and the obvious fact that he lost the war and is desperate to get out of it, none of that is working.

The other issue on the table is the war in Ukraine. After promising to make a peace deal on his first day in office, Trump has pretty much abandoned it, only reluctantly agreeing to sell the Ukrainians more weapons. The EU and Britain have stepped up, and Ukraine has shown itself to be an immensely resilient country with impressive military cunning, pushing Russia’s mighty military to unsustainable casualties. Trump has made it clear that he’s out, telling the press, “We have nothing to do with it; we sell weapons to them. It has no impact on us. … We’re thousands of miles away.” So says the man who has spent the last three months waging a pointless war in the Middle East.

Trump has agreed to restore the sanctions on Russian oil and proclaimed that he hates to see all the dying and will do whatever he can to get Russia to the negotiating table. His heart’s not in it. He appears to have accepted that he’s never going to get his coveted Nobel Peace Prize, so what’s the point?

There is one bright spot for the weary, spent octogenarian. While German Chancellor Friedrich Merz disappointed him with nothing better than a World Cup soccer jersey with Trump’s name and the number 47 on the back, French President Emmanuel Macron came through with a gift so perfect, Trump actually extended his stay.

Macron invited him to a formal dinner to be held at the one place Trump admires most in the world, other than Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower: the Palace of Versailles. Trump said, “I was leaving in the afternoon and then the French president, who happens to be a very nice man, invited me to dinner at Versailles. Versailles is not a gold leaf. Versailles is the real deal.” The real deal

For just a moment, he was in his happy place, contemplating his ballroom and thinking about how he might compare to Louis XIV, the monarch he might most admire if he knew anything about him. After that dinner, he will fly back to the United States filled with inspiration and will no doubt begin revising his plans for the new White House ballroom by adding something he should have thought of a long time ago: a hall of mirrors. What better tribute to a narcissistic would-be king could there possibly be?

Salon

To Obama Or Not To Obama

A question worth pondering

“First of all, what?”

On the morning of the opening of the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, Perry Bacon argues in The New Republic that it is fine for Democrats to admire the former president. Just don’t try to emulate him. Obama won the presidency (as I’ve said of Democrats’ voter turnout strategy) a long time ago in a political galaxy far, far away from this one.

“The problem is that the Democratic Party has a few oracles (Obama, Plouffe, Nancy Pelosi, James Carville) who are treated as political geniuses based on their wins long ago,” Bacon writes. They leave “the party in a state of nostalgia, always trying to repeat a kind of fantasy version of the past.” What Democrats need instead is “a strong party, with electoral strategies and policies not dependent on a single person or time. That won’t be easy to create. There are no shortcuts.” 

But there are other lessons Democrats can still learn from Obama the preternatural communicator without mimicking his policies, style and cadences, Dan Pfeiffer argues at his Substack.

Obama may be a policy wonk, but he speaks like an ordinary person at rallies, conversationally, and not like he’s giving a speech. People tune in rather than tune out.

“Barack Obama is good at telling jokes,” Pfeiffer notes. “Over the years, Obama often asked us to find jokes or funny ways to make a point about one of his opponents. He understood that laughter leavened the political attack. A smile achieves more than an angry grimace.”

Pfeiffer adds:

The former President made waves on a recent appearance on Pod Save America when he said that Democrats could be “buzzkills.” He was making a broader point about the party, but he also believes that the best politics are fun politics. People don’t want to join an angry, self-loathing movement. Taking back our country should be a righteous and joyous fight, so let’s have a little fun along the way.

Please. It’s why I’m dancing around with message signs five rush hours per week to the amusement (and a few cheers) of commuters. Take Anat Shenker-Osorio’s advice to heart: “If you want people to come to your party, throw a better party.” Do the unexpected. Be more fun. A woman screamed out her car window yesterday, “You’re awesome!” Another walked up on the overpass on Friday and hugged me out of the blue. Another weeks ago shouted across her kid in the passenger seat, “I love you!” When do you get that in this business?

Democrats also need to take back the flag and patriotism from the phonies.

“At its core, our politics is a battle over the story America tells itself,” Pfeiffer explains. “Who are we? What do we stand for? And what does it mean to be an American?” (That’s one many on the right answer in the wrong.) No one did that better than Obama in his famous 2004 convention speech:

I stand here knowing that my story is part of the larger American story, that I owe a debt to all of those who came before me, and that, in no other country on earth, is my story even possible. Tonight, we gather to affirm the greatness of our nation, not because of the height of our skyscrapers, or the power of our military, or the size of our economy. Our pride is based on a very simple premise, summed up in a declaration made over two hundred years ago, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

Pfeiffer is blunt, as we all should be on this point, that “the party that wants to destroy democracy, overturn elections, do favors for the rich, and take away people’s retirement doesn’t get to own patriotism. But they will if we let them.”

Easier said than done. But easier if we start.

A Legend In His Own Mind

And hermetically sealed

This headline on Politico’s landing page captures Donald Trump’s Zaphod Beeblebrox-level self-regard: Republicans fear Trump is hurting their chances. He can’t understand why.

President Donald Trump believes he handed Republicans a winning playbook for the midterms — if only they’d follow it.

Gerrymander everywhere possible, get rid of the filibuster, fire the Senate parliamentarian and pass the SAVE America Act.

His sycophantic aides are no less blinded inside the hermetically sealed Trump bubble:

“If everyone just follows his lead, follows the blueprints he’s laid out, and runs on the record that he has, then I think we’ll fare well,” said a senior White House official, granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

His winning record?

So much winning to run on? Inflation is up. Food costs are up (even if gasoline has dropped below $4, barely). Trump lost the war he started with Iran and will pay Iran for the privilege of getting his ass handed to him at the cost of billions in taxpayer money:

The signing of the 14-point memorandum comes after nearly four months of war that has depleted U.S. munitions stockpiles, crippled shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, sent energy prices soaring and proved deeply unpopular in the U.S.

The New York Times reports:

After the Trump administration released the text of the arrangement on Wednesday, some Senate Republicans reacted with fierce criticism, skepticism and alarm. Prominent members of the G.O.P.’s old guard from outside Congress also sounded dubious notes. And even some of the president’s allies in the conservative news media voiced concern.

“Reagan is rolling over in his grave,” tweeted lame duck Sen. Bill Cassidy (R) of Louisiana. “This is the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”

Iona Cleave writes for The Telegraph. Here’s the headline on her op-ed this morning: How Trump’s ‘Operation Epic Disaster’ turned the world against America

The US will probably be paying the price for Operation Epic Fury for years to come.

The 108-day war dealt a wounding blow to American credibility on the world stage and has shaken global faith in the US as a provider of security.

Mr Trump wanted to bring the Islamic Republic to its knees. Now, he finds himself negotiating a settlement with a regime uninterested in an immediate deal and bolstered by the conflict.

Trump, who came to D.C. pledging to “drain the swamp,” spent $14 million building his own. The Washington Post headline? Reflecting Pool algae blooms have roared back, reaching highest levels in years

YourAnonNews tweets:

The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool had aging pipes, cracked concrete and filtration problems. Trump’s administration spent over $14 million but didn’t fix the infrastructure. Now it’s covered in algae and they’re dumping 12% hydrogen peroxide in it.

That’s the most perfect metaphor for modern Republican governance we’ve seen all year. Paint the surface. Ignore the problem. Try to fix the fuckup and blame somebody else.

Trump will declare victory and move on. The man engages in magical thinking. If he simply repeats what he wants enough times, and loudly, he will call that reality into existence. Trump mentor, Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, instructed young Donald in “The Power of Positive Thinking” (1952). Trump’s witchcraft-condemning evangelical hangers-on likely practice “Name It and Claim It” Christianity.

Let them wish the algae out of Trump’s $14 million swamp.

Update: h/t DJ

Iran By The Numbers

The cost of global chaos

14

NBC News:

The U.S. is expected to lift sanctions on Iran and unfreeze funds and assets linked to the country’s regime, under a 14-point memorandum of understanding provided to NBC News by a senior U.S. official.

The interim agreement declares an intent to bring about an “immediate and permanent termination of military operations” in the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran, which began Feb. 28, unleashing chaos across the Middle East and rattling the world economy.

100x

300 Billion

44 Countries

113 Billion

47, the author of this shit show

Dazed and Confused

Tom Nichols has a good piece in the Atlantic about Trump and the war (gift link) that nails Trump’s views of foreign policy:

No one outside of the Trump administration has yet seen the final memorandum of understanding that Trump and the Iranians have signed, least of all, according to some reports, the Israelis. If the outlines of the deal are in line with the administration’s own talking points, it’s bound to cause serious agita in Jerusalem: The terms reportedly require a cessation of Israeli hostilities with Hezbollah in Lebanon, a tricky condition considering that Israel was not a party to the negotiations. This is probably why Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced yesterday that Israel would maintain its presence in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria for “as long as necessary.”

Trump, in other words, is trying to deal away Israel’s right to defend itself, treating it less as a sovereign country and more as a kind of 51st U.S. state run by an annoying governor who needs to get with the program. But what if Iran’s proxy Hezbollah attacks Israel? According to the president, the Israelis need to calm down, and he minimized Hezbollah as “a little pinprick out there that constantly rears its head.”

Besides, Trump has an answer for the problem of Hezbollah: Outsource its elimination to the Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa. Trump said that he suggested to Israel to “let Syria take care of Hezbollah, ’cause to be honest with you, I think they do a better job of doing it.”

It’s true that Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the organization now in power in Syria, has plenty of experience fighting against Hezbollah. But Syria, a regime still trying to get its legs under it, is not going to march next door and pacify Lebanon—especially not with Israel occupying parts of Syria.

Trump has never shown very much concern about the conduct of Israeli military operations anywhere (including the war in Gaza, which he viewed primarily as a public-relations problem). But now that he needs to rein in Jerusalem at Tehran’s behest, he has taken the position that the Israelis are causing too much damage in Lebanon. And in a stunning reminder that alliances for Trump are only expedients, he pivoted to praising al-Sharaa and criticizing Israel, saying that if Israel “can’t do the job without killing everyone else, he’ll do the job.”

This kind of flip-flop illustrates Trump’s view of global politics: States are just a bunch of playing cards that he can rearrange at will, which makes watching him talk about foreign policy this way like watching someone cheating at solitaire. Even now, after many years as president, he is constantly frustrated to find out how little leverage he has when other nations refuse to abandon their own interests and do as he commands.

He honestly believes that his charisma is so powerful that he can force anyone to do as he chooses. Well, except for Vlad and Xi, whom he sees as peers, and has to cajole. The rest of the world is supposed to bend to his will, and he is flummoxed when they don’t. (I think he’s extremely confused by Zelensky and Ukraine. They have no cards! And yet they won’t give up and lo and behold, appear to be winning against the big bad Vlad. How does that happen?)

You’d feel bad for Netanyahu for being so betrayed if he weren’t Netanyahu. But I’m sorry to say that he gets what he deserves. He manipulated this narcissistic moron we have as president, only to find out that he has a feral instinct for survival and zero loyalty. Hello? Has he met Donald Trump? I’m afraid the two of them are stuck together in history — and in hell — for what they’ve done and they deserve it.

Trouble MAGAland

Trump’s most fervent supporters in the GOP establishment are having a tough time:

President Trump’s Iran deal has opened an explosive second front in MAGA’s civil war, waged by hawkish allies who view U.S. concessions as an existential betrayal of Israel. Across two terms and 11 years in the political spotlight, no issue has divided Trump’s base more than the Iran war.

When U.S. strikes began, leading isolationists — from Tucker Carlson to Marjorie Taylor Greene — were excommunicated for suggesting Trump had abandoned “America First” principles on behalf of Israel. Three months later, with an interim deal in hand and peace potentially on the horizon, the Republican hawks who cheered Trump into battle are now leading their own furious rebellion.

Boo hoo. Lie down with dogs, yadda, yadda, yadda. They really didn’t like it when he said that the Iranians are “rational people” who are just “looking to help their country.” LOL!!! This is the man who calls Kim Jong Un, the craziest leader on the planet and a certified mass murdering psychopath, a great guy. He invited the Taliban to Camp David! What did they expect?

Lest you think they are turning on Dear Leader himself, don’t bother. They’ve found a scapegoat:

  • Many of the critics are careful not to attack Trump himself. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called on “the architect of the deal, Vice President Vance,” to come before Congress to defend it.

 Vance may be more vulnerable to the deal’s political fallout than Trump, who can always pitch himself as the president who took on Iran when no one else dared.

  • Vance, the likely 2028 heir to the MAGA throne and a longtime skeptic of foreign entanglements, helped negotiate the MOU and is expected to sign it Friday in Geneva.
  • Defending the deal on Megyn Kelly’s show Tuesday, Vance dismissed hawk critics as wanting “an endless conflict” that goes on “until every Iranian is dead” — then urged MAGA skeptics to stay inside the coalition.
  • Vance’s 2028 risk is that he inherit both sides of the rupture — a war that alienated MAGA’s isolationists, and a deal that enraged its hawks.

I love this. Vance is everywhere on TV right now, hyping his book and being the face of the deal. I suppose he doesn’t have any choice, but it’s hilarious to watch. This war wasn’t his thing; it was Marco’s, and Marco is nowhere to be seen.

The whining is pathetic:

 “If the president signed a bad deal, many of us who cheered and stood by him and thought that his action in Iran was heroic, will be extraordinarily disappointed,” conservative commentator Ben Shapiro told The Wall Street Journal.

Did they think he had the slightest clue what he was doing? I guess they did. Or they didn’t realize that while he’s a blowhard and a bully, he is actually a coward who just wants to intimidate people into licking his boots. This is TACO Trump.

Did they think he actually cares about anything but himself? The delusion runs deep among this crowd.

What. Fresh. Hell. Is. This?

It’s actually getting hard to resist becoming a conspiracy theorist when you read stuff like this:

A trove of internal records from a secret society for powerful figures in US politics, finance, and tech was left exposed online, WIRED has confirmed, naming participants in its events and revealing sensitive personal details they were assured would stay private.

The group, called Dialog, is a private, invitation-only organization cofounded in 2006 by the billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel. It convenes US officials, foreign government figures, and Silicon Valley executives at off-the-record annual retreats. Dialog has spent two decades declining to disclose its members.

[…]

A source separately provided WIRED with the registration list for Dialog’s 2026 retreat, which names 222 people and records what the list describes as each registrant’s membership status and attendee type, including “active member” and “guest.” The retreat is scheduled for August 12-16 at a venue near Dublin, Ireland.

The same data lays out a program of off-the-record sessions, including: “Money (Does?) Buy Happiness,” “Bring Back Nuclear,” “Navigating WWIII,” “Battlefield Technologies,” and “How’s Your Sex Life?” Other talks include “Build-a-Cult,” moderated by the founder of the Christian networking site Pray.com, and “Build-a-Party,” run by a former White House national security official.

These secret societies, Epstein, Bohemian Grove, Harlan Crow and his entourage … all these rich and powerful men getting together to run the world:

The registration records list General Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s supreme allied commander Europe and the head of US European Command, who took the post in July 2025 and is recorded on the leaked list as having attended Dialog gatherings since 2021. The website directory names sitting Trump administration officials, two US senators, six members of the Paypal Mafia, a former Middle East chief of intelligence, and a sitting ambassador to the United States, along with the founders and directors of many of the country’s largest surveillance, data-broker, and advertising-data companies.

The article also names Scott Bessent and Ted Cruz among others, and while it doesn’t say how much you want to bet that the Vice President of the United States is one of them?

Read the whole thing to get a sense of just how demented this whole thing is. It’s actually a little bit terrifying that these people are our “elites” because they are extremely weird.

Lowlights

This country voted this into office twice and it was no coincidence that he was running against women each time. They hate us so much that they were willing to let this freak run the country.

Trump’s Problems Are Not Over

Check out the GOP Hopium:

“It’s not too late for Republicans — if Trump can resist constantly tanking what Republicans on the ballot want to talk about: what they’ve done to lower costs and put more money in voters’ pockets, and what they would do in the next Congress,” said longtime GOP strategist Doug Heye. “Voter registration data in swing districts is encouraging for Republicans. If some of the albatross of Trump’s low numbers can be lifted, they can be in a better place.”

I guess they figure that what happened to Joe Biden couldn’t possibly happen to Donald Trump. After all, Joe Biden was old and Trump is a sprightly 80.

Not likely:

[E]ven if prices ease, some Republicans, including those close to the White House, fear that voter perceptions of a sour economy are already baked in and irreversible before the midterms. They note that President Donald Trump and the GOP were already grappling with affordability concerns before the war began at the end of February — and that merely returning to the status quo isn’t enoughparticularly given the central role the economy plays in driving voter behavior at the polls.

It’s baked in. However, Trump has the ability to persuade millions that black is white and up is down, so I suppose he can make at least a few of them believe that it’s really great that they can’t afford to pay for food and shelter. Don’t underestimate him.

Still, I really don’t think he can entirely outrun reality. The best case is that it isn’t a tsunami and is instead a standard blue wave. The worst case is a total wipe out. It would be really great if it were the latter because it makes it a little bit tougher for them to contest it. If it’s close they’ll go nuts.

Is Politics Of Love The Answer?

The Christian right sees demons

James Talarico, you’ve been found guilty by right-wing media of quoting Jesus, writes Boulder-based pastor and writer, Andrew Daugherty. Talarico is “demonic” and “blasphemous.” Who knew? The Texas Democrat is running for U.S. Senate, basically, on the New Testament. That is, on “fake” passages from the red letters in the gospels.

Daugherty explains at Salon:

The passages in question are familiar ones, found in Matthew 22 and Matthew 25. Love God and love your neighbor. Feed the hungry, heal the sick, welcome the stranger. They are, in fact, in the Bible.

The right’s attacks on Talarico aren’t about him, or at least not entirely. They’re about a much older argument — one progressive Christianity has been losing in public for 50 years — about whose version of the faith gets to count as real. The answer to that question has consequences far beyond any Senate race. When Christianity becomes a tool of power rather than a challenge to it, it doesn’t just damage the church. It destabilizes democracy. We are watching that happen in real time.

And a whole lotta destabilizin’s goin’ on since the Christian right threw in with Donald Trump. But as Daugherty offers, the right’s effort to claim the U.S. for its version of Christianity is at least 50 years old. Its claim to real Christianity is a fellow traveler with conservatives’ claims to being the only Real Americans™.

Talarico calls his approach a “politics of love.” What does he mean by that, exactly? Well, it’s among the most demanding and disruptive political frameworks ever articulated. Blessed are the poor. Blessed are the peacemakers. Love your enemies. Do good to those who hate you. That is drawn, of course, from the Sermon on the Mount. It is not ambiguous, and every empire that has ever heard that message has tried to kill the person saying it.

The Christian right spent decades narrowing the Gospel down to two issues, abortion and gay marriage. Talarico told Stephen Colbert something that’s obvious to anyone who has read past the cover of the Bible, rather than carrying it around for show: Jesus never mentions either of those things. But in Matthew 25, words in plain language, attributed explicitly to Jesus, tell us we will be judged by how we have treated the hungry, the sick, the stranger and the imprisoned.

“Politics is just another word for how we treat our neighbors,” Talarico told a rally in Lubbock.

“That is basically the entire Sermon on the Mount,” Daugherty argues. “It is also the most theologically orthodox thing said in recent memory by a Senate candidate in a state where the Christian right has long since decided it holds the copyright on Jesus.”

And that doesn’t sit well with Old Testamentarians who brand themselves followers of Christ. On why the right finds Talarico so threatening, Daugherty throws down:

A politics of love is a democratic ideal in the deepest sense, rooted in the conviction that every person bears the image of God and is therefore owed dignity, justice and care. It asks what we owe, not what we can take. It asks who our neighbor is, and then refuses to draw the boundary anywhere short of everyone.

The Christian right is panicking because that question, asked seriously, dismantles every policy built on exclusion. It has no deportation list. It has no means test. It has no preferred ethnicity. It has only this: Whatever you did for the least of these, you did for me.

Amen.


As a related bonus, Bill Drexel, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, writes in The Washington Post that A.I. developers might want to preach a little gospel to the machines some fear soon might not “align” with humanity’s interests. The A.I.s might, as often in fiction, turn on their makers. Maybe program into the digital dears some version of religious experience:

Most alignment concerns revolve around AI working toward its own self-interest, rather than the transcendent good that religious devotion seeks to develop. For instance, engineers fear that AI programs might disguise selfish intentions with altruism.

To allay some of these worries, engineers might try hardwiring a version of Christianity’s doctrine of original sin into their models, including a self-reflective skepticism about any seemingly benign intentions. Hindu dharma also provides a powerful framework to help constrain AI systems’ tendency toward misaligned “power-seeking” — an indiscriminate drive to accumulate influence and resources — by binding the programs to their rightful duties in the service of human flourishing.

“Instead of raising a demigod, might they not try to engineer a Gabriel?” asks Drexel.

But if you really want to spook “Christians” who want to see James Talarico’s politics dead, an A.I. preacher to replace them might be just the trick.