Abstract
Female as opposed to male listeners were better able to use a delayed informative cue at the end of a long sentence to report an earlier word which was disrupted by noise. Informative (semantically related) or uninformative (semantically unrelated) word cues were presented 2, 6, or 10 words after a target word whose initial phoneme had been replaced with noise. A total of 84 young adults (45 males) listened to each sentence and then repeated it after its offset. The semantic benefit effect (SBE) was the difference in the accuracy of report of the disrupted target word during informative vs. uninformative sentences. Women had significantly higher SBEs than men even though there were no significant sex differences in terms of number of non-target words reported, the effect of distance between the disrupted target word and the informative cue, or kinds of errors generated. We suggest that the superior ability of women to use delayed semantic information to decode an earlier ambiguous speech signal may be linked to women’s tendency to engage the hemispheres more bilaterally than men during word processing. Since the maintenance of semantic context under ambiguous conditions demands more right than left hemispheric resources, this may give women an advantage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bard, E., Shillcock, R., & Altmann, G. (1989). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Effect of subsequent context. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 395–408.
Beeman, M. J., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Complementary right-and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 2–8.
Chen, C., Xue, G., Dong, Q., Jin, Z., Li, T., Xue, F., et al. (2007). Sex determines the neurofunctional predictors of visual word learning. Neuropsychologia, 45, 741–747.
Dong, Q., Mei, L., Xue, G., Chen, C., Li, T., Xue, F., et al. (2008). Sex-dependent neurofunctional predictors of long-term maintenance of visual word learning. Neuroscience Letters, 430, 87–91.
Dubno, J., Ahlstrom, J., & Horwitz, A. (2000). Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 538–546.
Grant, K. W., & Seitz, P. (2000). The recognition of isolated words and words in sentences: Individual variability in the use of sentence context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1000–1011.
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., et al. (1999). Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: Correlations with cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 4065–4072.
Kalikow, D., Stevens, K., & Elliot, L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility on noise using sentence materials with controlled work predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337–1351.
Kansaku, K., Yamaura, A., & Kitazawa, S. (2000). Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 866–872.
Liederman, J., Gilbert, K., McGraw Fisher, J., Mathews, G., Frye, R. E., & Joshi, P. (2010). Are women more influenced than men by top-down semantic information when listening to disrupted speech? Language and Speech, 54, 33–48.
Phillips, M. D., Lowe, M. J., Lurito, J. T., Dzemidzic, M., & Mathews, V. P. (2001). Temporal lobe activation demonstrates sex-based differences during passive listening. Radiology, 220, 202–207.
Ruytjens, L., Albers, F., Van Dijk, P., Wit, H., & Willemsen, A. (2006). Neural responses to silent lip-reading in normal hearing male and female subjects. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1835–1844.
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Todd, R., Skudlarski, C. P., Fulbright, R. K., et al. (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373, 607–609.
Sivonen, P., Maess, B., Lattner, S., & Friederici, A. (2006). Phonemic restoration in a sentence context: Evidence from early and late ERP effects. Brain Research, 1121, 177–189.
Strelnikov, K., Rouger, J., Lagleyre, B., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., & Barone, P. (2009). Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects. Neuropsychologia, 47, 972–979.
Watson, C., Qiu, W. W., Chamberlain, M. M., & Li, X. (1996). Sex differences in lip-reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 106–108.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a SPRInG award, a UROP award from Boston University, and an NSF Grant 0354378 to the Center for Excellence in Learning, Education and Technology (J.L., Investigator). We would like to thank Kate Tinmouth for her comments on the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liederman, J., Fisher, J.M., Coty, A. et al. Sex Differences in the Use of Delayed Semantic Context When Listening to Disrupted Speech. Arch Sex Behav 42, 197–201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9941-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9941-7
