Skip to main content
Log in

New troglitazone derivatives devoid of PPARγ agonist activity display an increased antiproliferative effect in both hormone-dependent and hormone-independent breast cancer cell lines

  • Preclinical study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous recent studies indicate that most anticancer effects of PPARγ agonists like thiazolidinediones are the result of PPARγ-independent pathways. These conclusions were obtained by several approaches including the use of thiazolidinedione derivatives like Δ2-Troglitazone (Δ2-TGZ) that does not activate PPARγ. Since biotinylation has been proposed as a mechanism able to increase the specificity of drug delivery to cancer cells which could express a high level of vitamin receptor, a biotinylated derivative of Δ2-TGZ (bΔ2-TGZ) has been synthetized. In the present article, we have studied the in vitro effects of this molecule on both hormone-dependent (MCF-7) and hormone-independent (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells. In both cell lines, bΔ2-TGZ was more efficient than Δ2-TGZ to decrease cell viability. bΔ2-TGZ was also more potent than Δ2-TGZ to induce the proteasomal degradation of cyclin D1 in both cell lines and those of ERα in MCF-7 cells. However, in competition experiments, the presence of free biotin in the culture medium did not decrease the antiproliferative action of bΔ2-TGZ. Besides, other compounds that had no biotin but that were substituted at the same position of the phenolic group of the chromane moiety of Δ2-TGZ decreased cell viability similarly to bΔ2-TGZ. Hence, we concluded that the increased antiproliferative action of bΔ2-TGZ was not due to biotin itself but to the functionalization of the terminal hydroxyl group. This should be taken into account for the design of new thiazolidinedione derivatives able to affect not only hormone-dependent but also hormone-independent breast cancer cells in a PPARγ-independent pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sørlie T (2004) Molecular portraits of breast cancer: tumour subtypes as distinct disease entities. Eur J Cancer 40(18):2667–2675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Early Breast Cancer Trialist’ Collaborative Group (EBCTC) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nahta R, Esteva FJ (2006) Herceptin: mechanisms of action and resistance. Cancer Lett 232(2):123–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burstein HJ, Demetri GD, Mueller E et al (2003) Use of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma ligand TGZ as treatment for refractory breast cancer: a phase II study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79:391–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yee LD, Williams N, Wen P et al (2007) Pilot study of rosiglitazone therapy in women with breast cancer: effects of short-term therapy on tumor tissue and serum marker. Clin Cancer Res 13:246–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M et al (1995) The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell 83:835–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Isseman I, Green S (1990) Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators. Nature 347:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kliewer SA, Forman BM, Blumberg B et al (1994) Differential expression and activation of a family of murine peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7355–7359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dreyer C, Krey G, Keller H et al (1992) Control of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation pathway by a novel family of nuclear hormone receptors. Cell 68:879–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Issemann I, Prince RA, Tugwood JD et al (1993) The retinoid X receptor enhances the function of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor. Biochimie 75:251–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM (1995) The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKenna NJ, O’Malley BW (2002) Minireview: nuclear receptor coactivators—an update. Endocrinology 43:2461–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang W, Rachez C, Freedman LP (2000) Discrete roles for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and retinoid X receptor in recruiting nuclear receptor coactivators. Mol Cell Biol 20:8008–8017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thoennes SR, Tate PL, Price TM et al (2000) Differential transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in MCF-7 cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 160:67–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forman BM, Tontonoz P, Chen J et al (1995) 15-Deoxy-delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR gamma. Cell 83:803–812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kliewer SA, Lenhard JM, Willson TM et al (1995) A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83:813–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spiegelman BM (1998) PPAR-gamma: adipogenic regulator and thiazolidinedione receptor. Diabetes 47:507–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim KY, Kim SS, Cheon HG (2006) Differential anti-proliferative actions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol 72:530–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elstner E, Muller C, Koshizuka K et al (1998) Ligands for peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor gamma and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8806–8811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mueller E, Sarraf P, Tontonoz P et al (1998) Terminal differentiation of human breast cancer through PPARγ. Mol Cell 1:465–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehta RG, Williamson E, Patel MK et al (2000) A ligand of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, retinoids, and prevention of preneoplastic mammary lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fenner MH, Elstner E (2005) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ ligands for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 14:557–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin F, Wakino S, Liu Z et al (2001) TGZ inhibits growth of MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells by targeting G1 cell cycle regulators. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 286:916–922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kar R, Singha PK, Venkatachalam MA et al (2009) A novel role for MAP1 LC3 in nonautophagic cytoplasmic vacuolation death of cancer cells. Oncogene 28(28):2556–2568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou J, Zhang W, Liang B et al (2009) PPARgamma activation induces autophagy in breast cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41(11):2334–2342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goetze S, Xi XP, Kawano H et al (1999) PPAR gamma-ligands inhibit migration mediated by multiple chemoattractants in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 33:798–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xin X, Yang S, Kowalski J et al (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands are potent inhibitors of angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 274:9116–9121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blanquicett C, Roman J, Hart CM (2008) Thiazolidinediones as anti-cancer agents. Cancer Ther 6(A):25–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei S, Yang J, Lee SL et al (2009) PPARgamma-independent antitumor effects of thiazolidinediones. Cancer Lett 276(2):119–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Clay CE, Monjazeb A, Thorburn J et al (2002) 15-Deoxy-delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2-induced apoptosis does not require PPARgamma in breast cancer cells. J Lipid Res 43(11):1818–1828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shiau CW, Yang CC, Kulp SK et al (2005) Thiazolidenediones mediate apoptosis in prostate cancer cells in part through inhibition of Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 functions independently of PPARgamma. Cancer Res 65(4):1561–1569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lecomte J, Flament S, Salamone S et al (2008) Disruption of ERα signalling pathway by PPARγ agonists: evidences of PPARγ-independent events in two hormone-dependent breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:437–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang CC, Ku CY, Wei S et al (2006) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-independent repression of prostate-specific antigen expression by thiazolidinediones in prostate cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol 69(5):1564–1570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang JW, Shiau CW, Yang YT et al (2005) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ-independent ablation of cyclin D1 by thiazolidinediones and their derivatives in breast cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol 67:1342–1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Russell-Jones G, McTavish K, McEwan J et al (2004) Vitamin-mediated targeting as a potential mechanism to increase drug uptake by tumours. J Inorg Biochem 98(10):1625–1633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang W, Cheng Y, Xu T et al (2009) Targeting cancer cells with biotin-dendrimer conjugates. Eur J Med Chem 44(2):862–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Boschi D, Tron GC, Lazzarato L et al (2006) NO-donor phenols: a new class of products endowed with antioxidant and vasodilator properties. J Med Chem 49:2886–2897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang JW, Shiau CW, Yang J et al (2006) Development of small-molecule cyclin D1-ablative agents. J Med Chem 49:4684–4689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Turturro F, Friday E, Fowler R et al (2004) Troglitazone acts on cellular pH and DNA synthesis through a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-independent mechanism in breast cancer-derived cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 10(20):7022–7030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang J, Wei S, Wang DS et al (2008) Pharmacological exploitation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist ciglitazone to develop a novel class of androgen receptor-ablative agents. J Med Chem 51(7):2100–2107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim HJ, Kim JY, Meng Z et al (2007) 15-deoxy-Delta 12, 14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor-alpha via covalent modification of DNA-binding domain. Cancer Res 67:2595–2602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kansara V, Luo S, Balasubrahmanyam B et al (2006) Biotin uptake and cellular translocation in human derived retinoblastoma cell line (Y-79): a role of hSMVT system. Int J Pharm 312(1–2):43–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants of the “Université Henri Poincaré (BQR),” “Conseil Régional de Lorraine,” “Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer,” “Ligue Contre le Cancer, comité de la Haute-Marne”, “Cancéropôle Grand Est.” Julie Lecomte was recipient of a grant of the “Ligue Contre le Cancer, comité de la Haute-Marne.” Christelle Colin was recipient of a grant of the “Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche”. We would like to thank SANOFI-AVENTIS for a studentship to Stéphane Salamone. We acknowledge Alexandra Kleinclauss for fruitful contribution to cell culture and western blotting. We also thank Martine Chillet, Brigitte Fernette, Sandrine Adach, and François Dupire for their technical assistance. The pPPRE3tkLuc construct was a generous gift from Pr. Philippe Becuwe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Flament.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colin, C., Salamone, S., Grillier-Vuissoz, I. et al. New troglitazone derivatives devoid of PPARγ agonist activity display an increased antiproliferative effect in both hormone-dependent and hormone-independent breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124, 101–110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0700-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0700-y

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Christelle Colin
  2. Isabelle Grillier-Vuissoz
  3. Michel Boisbrun