Scientific quality is hard to define, and numbers are easy to look at. But bibliometrics are warping science — encouraging quantity over quality. Leaders at two research institutions describe how they do things differently.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Evidence and consequences of academic drift in the field of dental research: A bibliometric analysis 2000–2015
BDJ Open Open Access 17 January 2022
-
The 1-h fraud detection challenge
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Open Access 10 July 2021
-
Reflections around ‘the cautionary use’ of the h-index: response to Teixeira da Silva and Dobránszki
Scientometrics Open Access 09 March 2018
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Dijstelbloem, H., Huisman, F., Mijnhardt, W. & Miedema, F. Science in Transition (2013); available at http://www.scienceintransition.nl/english
Wilsdon, J. et al. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (HEFCE, 2015); available at http://go.nature.com/2da5khq
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S. & Rafols, I. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015).
EU2016.nl. Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science (2016); available at http://go.nature.com/2dnqmsv
Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S. & Varmus, H. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5773–5777 (2014).
Schatz, G. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 423–426 (2014).
Ioannidis, J. P. A. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).
Macleod, M. R. et al. Lancet 383, 101–104 (2014).
De Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D. & Franssen, T. P. Res. Eval. 25, 161–169 (2015).
Building on Success and Learning from Experience: An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework (UK Government, 2016); available at http://go.nature.com/2e692uc
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Early-career researchers need fewer burdens and more support 2016-Oct-26
Lost in the citation valley 2016-Oct-11
Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric 2016-Jul-08
We need a measured approach to metrics 2015-Jul-08
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics 2015-Apr-22
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benedictus, R., Miedema, F. & Ferguson, M. Fewer numbers, better science. Nature 538, 453–455 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/538453a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/538453a
This article is cited by
-
Evidence and consequences of academic drift in the field of dental research: A bibliometric analysis 2000–2015
BDJ Open (2022)
-
Evaluation and monitoring of transdisciplinary collaborations
The Journal of Technology Transfer (2022)
-
The 1-h fraud detection challenge
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (2021)
-
Open Science als Beitrag zur Qualität in der Bildungsforschung
Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung (2020)
-
Feasibility of activity-based expert profiling using text mining of scientific publications and patents
Scientometrics (2020)