Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Fewer numbers, better science

Scientific quality is hard to define, and numbers are easy to look at. But bibliometrics are warping science — encouraging quantity over quality. Leaders at two research institutions describe how they do things differently.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Dijstelbloem, H., Huisman, F., Mijnhardt, W. & Miedema, F. Science in Transition (2013); available at http://www.scienceintransition.nl/english

  2. Wilsdon, J. et al. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (HEFCE, 2015); available at http://go.nature.com/2da5khq

  3. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S. & Rafols, I. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. EU2016.nl. Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science (2016); available at http://go.nature.com/2dnqmsv

  5. Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S. & Varmus, H. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5773–5777 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schatz, G. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 423–426 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ioannidis, J. P. A. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Macleod, M. R. et al. Lancet 383, 101–104 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D. & Franssen, T. P. Res. Eval. 25, 161–169 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Building on Success and Learning from Experience: An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework (UK Government, 2016); available at http://go.nature.com/2e692uc

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Frank Miedema or Mark W. J. Ferguson.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Early-career researchers need fewer burdens and more support 2016-Oct-26

Lost in the citation valley 2016-Oct-11

Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric 2016-Jul-08

We need a measured approach to metrics 2015-Jul-08

A numbers game 2015-Jul-08

Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics 2015-Apr-22

Special: Young scientists

Special: Science metrics

Outlook: Assessing Science

Related external links

Science in Transition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benedictus, R., Miedema, F. & Ferguson, M. Fewer numbers, better science. Nature 538, 453–455 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/538453a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/538453a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Careers

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Careers newsletter — what matters in careers research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Careers