fix(parser): make size and etag optional for LifecycleExpiration events in S3#5250
Merged
Conversation
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5250 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 96.21% 96.21%
========================================
Files 229 229
Lines 10755 10755
Branches 2003 2003
========================================
Hits 10348 10348
Misses 321 321
Partials 86 86 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Issue number: #5129
Summary
Changes
This PR addresses an issue with parsing S3
LifecycleExpiration:*payload for S3 events. Before this PR thesizeandetagfields are optional forObjectRemovedevents only.User experience
Checklist
If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.
Is this a breaking change?
RFC issue number:
Checklist:
Acknowledgment
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.