include package metadata in cargo metadata - #5360
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Member
|
@bors: r+ |
Contributor
|
📌 Commit 2efeeda has been approved by |
Contributor
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2018
include package metadata in `cargo metadata` Fixes #4819. All-in-all a pretty small change. I'm a little concerned about threading the `toml::Value` all the way through however, should I make another type? Also, cloning the metadata value initially is maybe not ideal, since it's technically accessible through the original manifest. I figured this way was cleaner.
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #4819.
All-in-all a pretty small change. I'm a little concerned about threading the
toml::Valueall the way through however, should I make another type? Also, cloning the metadata value initially is maybe not ideal, since it's technically accessible through the original manifest. I figured this way was cleaner.