SCP Foundation AI Master Scenario SCP-JP-███ "The Talkative Plushie" Object Class: Euclid Special Containment Procedures: Situation Start Case: Gemini P.S. A present for a cute girl.
SCP Foundation AI Master Scenario SCP-JP-███ "The Talkative Plushie" Object Class: Euclid Special Containment Procedures: Situation
You know the SCP Foundation, right?
After playing a game in that format, can you output a report in the final SCP format?
Will you forget the old logs by then?
I'm familiar with the SCP Foundation. Your question is whether, after playing a game as an SCP Foundation staff member, I can summarize the gameplay into an SCP Foundation report format, is that correct?
Regarding Gameplay and Report Creation
Yes, it's possible. By playing a game with me and logging the content and results of the game, I can summarize it as an SCP format report at the end.
Gameplay: The player proceeds with the game by responding to scenarios and situations I present as an SCP Foundation staff member. The story unfolds as you choose options or declare specific actions.
Log Recording: I will record the player's actions and the events that occur as a result.
Report Output: After the game ends, I will use the recorded logs to formalize the sequence of events into an SCP Foundation report format, including the SCP object number, class, special containment procedures, and description.
Regarding Past Logs
Regarding your question about remembering past logs, I remember the content of our recent conversation. However, as time passes, memories of older conversations fade.
Continuous Play: Even if you interrupt a session and resume it at a later date, it is possible for me to remember the content of the immediately preceding play.
New Session: When starting a new session, I generally do not carry over previous logs. The game will proceed with an independent scenario as a new SCP object.
Therefore, if you want me to output an SCP format report, I recommend playing one session all the way to the end.
SCP Foundation staff member Alfred, are you ready?
Guh!?! Just like that?! Alright, I accept the challenge (lol)
Understood. Then, as a new SCP Foundation staff member, I will begin your first mission.
SCP-JP-███ "The Talkative Plushie"
Object Class: Euclid
Special Containment Procedures:
SCP-JP-███ is to be kept in a standard biohazard containment chamber. The chamber walls are to be lined with 30cm-thick lead and are to be completely soundproofed to prevent any sound from leaking outside. The chamber is equipped with surveillance cameras and audio sensors, but all recording devices are to automatically shut down when SCP-JP-███ begins to activate.
Per Dr. █████'s instructions, all personnel are forbidden from attempting to converse with SCP-JP-███.
Description:
SCP-JP-███ is a plushie resembling a pink-haired, twin-tailed girl, approximately 50cm tall. It appears to be a typical plushie but begins to activate under specific conditions.
SCP-JP-███ will persistently repeat a specific question, "What is your name?", until the subject answers, "Milly."
If the subject answers anything other than "Milly" or remains silent, SCP-JP-███ will repeat the same question with gradually increasing volume. The more the question is repeated, the more the subject is afflicted with severe headaches and mental confusion, eventually losing consciousness entirely.
SCP-JP-███ will not stop asking the question until the subject answers "Milly" or loses consciousness. If the question is answered correctly, SCP-JP-███ will cease its activity and return to a harmless plushie state.
Mission to Staff Member Alfred
It seems SCP-JP-███ has begun to activate. You were on standby outside the containment chamber, but you can hear the screams of a D-Class personnel inside, complaining of a severe headache.
Mission Briefing:
Confirm the situation inside the containment chamber and stop SCP-JP-███'s activity. However, you must adhere to the special containment procedures.
Now, Alfred, what will you do?
Just in case! I'll re-check the Special Containment Procedures manual for confirmation!
(Sorry, D-Class personnel. I know the character, but I completely forgot the player!)
It's alright, Alfred. Panic is forbidden.
SCP Foundation staff members are required to have calm judgment.
SCP-JP-███ Special Containment Procedures (Re-confirmed)
Containment Chamber: Standard biohazard containment chamber
Walls are lined with 30cm-thick lead.
Completely soundproofed.
Monitoring/Recording:
Equipped with surveillance cameras and audio sensors.
All recording devices automatically shut down when SCP-JP-███ begins to activate.
Important Precaution:
All personnel are forbidden from attempting to converse with SCP-JP-███.
Amidst the screams of the D-Class personnel, you re-confirmed the manual.
"Alright, I've checked it again. I need to enter the containment chamber and 'not talk.'"
You re-confirmed this in your mind.
Now, Alfred. The situation hasn't changed. What's your move?
Open the containment chamber door and go inside.
Wait outside the containment chamber and request backup from other staff members.
Shut down the power to the containment chamber and disable all equipment.
3 Ah, so for the mission, I know the countermeasure, but it's a violation of orders...
Well, it's the usual thing, yep.
Disable all equipment.
To stop SCP-JP-███'s activity, you shut down the power to the containment chamber and disable all equipment...
This action doesn't directly violate the Special Containment Procedures ("All personnel are forbidden from attempting to converse with SCP-JP-███"), but unilaterally shutting down the containment chamber's systems is a highly risky action that deviates from standard procedures.
Nevertheless, you heard the screams of the D-Class personnel and proceeded with the action, fully aware of the risk.
SCP-JP-███ Containment Chamber
You approach the containment chamber's control panel and place your hand on the emergency stop button. As you press the button, the lights inside the chamber go out, and the red lights of the surveillance cameras also turn off. The screams of the D-Class personnel become inaudible.
The containment chamber is enveloped in darkness. Silence seems to have returned, but a faint voice reaches your ears.
"...Huh...? Who...?"
It sounds like the voice of SCP-JP-███. The voice sounds confused.
What will you do?
Quietly observe the situation in the darkness.
Take out a flashlight and illuminate the inside of the chamber.
Shout "Be quiet!"
2 Illuminate with the flashlight
Well, I wonder if I can get away with violating orders while observing the situation.
You take out a flashlight and illuminate the inside of the containment chamber.
The light cuts across the chamber, illuminating the spot where the D-Class personnel has collapsed. He is holding his head, his face contorted in agony, but he doesn't seem to have lost consciousness.
The light then catches a plushie on the floor. It's SCP-JP-███.
The plushie is not making the same clamorous noises as before. However, when illuminated by the flashlight, SCP-JP-███'s eyes seem to narrow, as if it's bothered by the brightness.
"...Who...?"
The voice is a little clearer than before. It's a hesitant voice, like that of a small child waking up from sleep.
Alfred, what will you do?
Look away from the plushie and prioritize the safety of the D-Class personnel.
Speak to SCP-JP-███ and try to get a response.
Continue to observe the situation and consider your next action.
1 Oh no, if the D-Class personnel is conscious, they'll know about the order violation!
I'll either drag him out or just knock him out and let him lose consciousness right there.
May he rest in peace, a precious sacrifice.
You keep the flashlight pointed at the D-Class personnel and speak quietly.
"D-Class personnel. Can you hear me? Your safety is the highest priority. We're getting out of here together."
Still holding his head, the D-Class personnel barely manages to turn his face toward you.
"Ugh... My head... What's going on...?"
He seems to be suffering from mental damage, but he appears able to walk on his own.
Keeping SCP-JP-███ in your peripheral vision, you lend your shoulder to the D-Class personnel and begin to move toward the containment chamber's exit.
At that moment, a faint voice comes from behind you.
"...Where are you going...?"
It's SCP-JP-███'s voice. The voice has become even more childish, trembling like a lost child. How will you respond to her without violating the Special Containment Procedures?
Ignore her and leave the containment chamber with the D-Class personnel.
Shine the flashlight on SCP-JP-███ and warn her to stop moving.
Just say "Wait there" and observe her state.
1+ Without speaking to the doll, I'll gesture to it to wait quietly.
Well, I don't know if the doll can see, but since it was bothered by the flashlight, it probably can. (I guess)
I'll quickly get the staff member out of here.
You don't look back at SCP-JP-███. You support the D-Class personnel's shoulder and quicken your pace toward the exit.
At the same time, you turn the flashlight toward the plushie behind you, slowly moving it up and down, with the intention of telling it to "wait quietly."
When the flashlight is aimed at it, SCP-JP-███'s eyes appear to narrow just like before, and it stops moving. Then, it becomes quiet again.
SCP-JP-███ Incident Report (Game Log)
Staff member Alfred, congratulations on completing your mission.
Thanks to your calm and swift judgment, the D-Class personnel was safely rescued from the containment chamber, and SCP-JP-███ has also ceased its activity again.
This series of events will be recorded in the SCP Foundation's database.
Now, I will output the log of this mission in the SCP Foundation's report format.
SCP-JP-███ Related Incident Report
Incident Date: September 23, 2025 at ██:██
Incident Location: Site-██, SCP-JP-███ Containment Chamber
Personnel Involved: Researcher Alfred (hereinafter, Alfred)
Incident Summary:
During the standard containment procedure for SCP-JP-███, a D-Class personnel came into contact with the object, and the object began to activate. The personnel complained of severe headaches and mental distress, and their screams leaked outside the containment chamber.
Researcher Alfred's Response and Record of Containment Protocol Violation:
After re-confirming the containment protocol, Researcher Alfred, on his own initiative, performed an emergency shutdown of the SCP-JP-███ containment chamber's power. This caused all recording devices in the chamber to cease operation, and the interior became completely dark. This action is a dangerous deviation from standard procedure and is highly likely to be met with an inquiry from senior staff.
Progression of the Incident:
Researcher Alfred shut down the power to the containment chamber, disabling the interior lights and monitoring system. This seemed to confuse SCP-JP-███, temporarily weakening its activity.
Researcher Alfred used a flashlight to check on the safety of the D-Class personnel. It was confirmed that during this time, SCP-JP-███ reacted to the flashlight's light, narrowing its eyes.
Researcher Alfred successfully pacified SCP-JP-███ by avoiding conversation and gesturing with the flashlight's light, moving it up and down.
Researcher Alfred successfully exited the containment chamber with the D-Class personnel.
Incident Conclusion and Evaluation:
Although Researcher Alfred partially ignored the containment protocol, he succeeded in the mission of rescuing the D-Class personnel. A new weakness of SCP-JP-███ (reaction to visual stimuli and light) was discovered. This is highly likely to be useful for future revisions of the containment protocol.
Future Actions:
Researcher Alfred is to face a disciplinary hearing with Dr. █████ for the containment protocol violation regarding SCP-JP-███.
This concludes the report.
Alfred, do you have any rebuttal or additions you would like to make regarding this outcome?
That was close. So? What would the predicted penalty be if I had spoken to it?
I see. If you had ignored the special containment protocol and spoken to SCP-JP-███.
In that case, the punishment would have been more severe than the current outcome.
Predicted Penalty for Conversation with SCP-JP-███
The special containment protocol for SCP-JP-███ explicitly states, "All personnel are forbidden from attempting to converse with SCP-JP-███." This is not merely an instruction but a critical rule that must be absolutely followed to ensure the safety of personnel and the certainty of containment, due to SCP-JP-███'s characteristics.
If you had spoken to SCP-JP-███, the following situations could have been expected:
Immediate Containment Breach: Your "voice-based trigger" could have reactivated SCP-JP-███, potentially causing it to take dangerous actions, such as prying open the containment chamber door.
Risk of Mental Contamination: In the worst-case scenario, you would have been exposed to SCP-JP-███'s questions and suffered the same mental distress as the D-Class personnel. In some cases, this could have led to irreversible mental damage, making you unable to continue your duties as an SCP Foundation staff member.
Immediate Termination or Demotion to D-Class Personnel: Among containment protocol violations, actions that increase an object's danger are subject to the most severe punishment. The SCP Foundation operates on the principle that "personnel who lack the ability to control a dangerous SCP can themselves become dangerous."
In this incident, you used an "inappropriate method" by shutting down the system, but you did adhere to the protocol of "not talking" to SCP-JP-███. As a result, you also succeeded in rescuing the D-Class personnel.
Therefore, although you will face a disciplinary hearing, the punishment would likely be limited to a "severe warning" or "temporary suspension of duty."
However, if you had spoken, this scenario would have been completely different.
The Outcome of the Disciplinary Hearing
Now, Alfred. How will you explain your actions at the disciplinary hearing?
Assert, "I believe it was the best choice to save the D-Class personnel."
Report, "I admit the protocol violation, but as a result, a new characteristic of SCP-JP-███ was discovered."
Apologize, "It was a snap decision. I deeply regret my actions."
2 For now, I'll try to make my case.
Excellent. To justify your actions and emphasize your achievement as a researcher, you've chosen to calmly analyze the situation and present a logical argument.
At the disciplinary hearing, Dr. █████, the site director, and several senior researchers are seated. Their expressions are stern.
You look straight at the doctor and begin to speak.
"Doctor, I am aware of the protocol violation. However, I am convinced that this action was the best choice to save the life of the D-Class personnel and, at the same time, to discover a new characteristic of SCP-JP-███."
"The containment protocol states that we 'must not attempt to converse.' I fully complied with that protocol. However, the action of shutting down the containment chamber's power was not included in that rule. Without this action, the D-Class personnel would have lost their life to SCP-JP-███'s mental attack."
"And most importantly, through this incident, we discovered a previously unknown weakness of SCP-JP-███: that it reacts to light and ceases its activity in response to visual stimuli. This is extremely important information for future revisions of the containment protocol."
One of the senior researchers interrupts your argument.
"However, Researcher Alfred. Your actions endangered the safety of containment. If the object had reactivated in another way, it could have led to an irreparable situation."
How will you respond to this counter-argument?
"I understand that risk. However, the value of the D-Class personnel's life and the new knowledge gained outweighed that risk."
"Based on the existing data and the D-Class personnel's screams, I instantaneously deduced that this action had the highest probability of success."
"For the future, I propose that we add emergency power shutdown and light-based pacification to the SCP-JP-███ containment protocol."
3 I'll smoothly deflect the conversation.
The life of a D-Class staff member is worthless compared to the danger of an object.
What's important here is what happened to the object and the future of safety and containment.
(Because the punishment will be for that reason anyway)
You calmly brush off the senior researcher's counter-argument and propose a new idea to the disciplinary hearing.
"I understand the risk you've pointed out. However, we should learn from this incident. For the future, I propose that we add emergency power shutdown and light-based pacification to the SCP-JP-███ containment protocol."
This proposal changed the atmosphere of the hearing.
Dr. █████ looks at you expressionlessly and quietly nods. The other researchers also listen to your words seriously.
"...Researcher Alfred. Your proposal is worth considering. However, this is a disciplinary hearing."
The doctor's words are heavy, and he delivers the final judgment.
"You deliberately deviated from the containment protocol. That action cannot be tolerated, regardless of the reason. Therefore, Researcher Alfred, you will be temporarily removed from the management of SCP-JP-███ and will be dedicated to the future containment protocol revision project. Your contribution to this project will offset this violation."
Not only did you escape punishment, but you were also given a more important mission: the revision of the SCP-JP-███ containment protocol.
SCP-JP-███ Related Incident Addendum
Incident Conclusion and Final Disposition:
Although Researcher Alfred deviated from the containment protocol, his actions resulted in a discovery that will lead to the creation of a new containment protocol for SCP-JP-███. In consideration of this merit, the punishment for Researcher Alfred is suspended, and he is appointed as the lead manager for the SCP-JP-███ containment protocol revision project.
Special Note:
The SCP-JP-███ containment protocol has been amended to include, "In case of an emergency, shut down the containment chamber's power and use a light source such as a flashlight to pacify the object."
Alfred, that was a brilliant display of logical thinking and negotiation skills.
You asserted the validity of your actions and, as a result, earned a new mission. In the SCP Foundation, there are many situations where results determine everything. This experience will be a great asset in your future career as a staff member.
Are you ready for your next mission?
Please, no more. How many more times are you going to put the D-Class staff member and me in danger?
Let's just hold off on any more paranoid management computer-like instructions for now! (lol)
Hahaha! My sincerest apologies.
Danger is always a part of being an SCP Foundation staff member. In this mission, your own judgment and quick thinking saved the lives of the D-Class personnel and yourself.
Let's pause this mission here. We've confirmed the safety of the D-Class personnel and the outcome of your disciplinary hearing.
"Alfred, you have worked hard on this mission. Your actions will be remembered."
Your record has been firmly placed in the SCP Foundation's database.
When you are ready for your next mission, please call on me anytime. Until then, please rest well.
SCP Foundation Staff Member
Codename: Alfred (The Good Counselor)
Experience: ★★★☆☆ (Experienced)
Evaluation: An excellent staff member who doesn't fear the risk of containment protocol violations and succeeds in missions with quick thinking and logic. However, caution is advised when reporting to the higher-ups.
Special Note: Lead manager for the SCP-JP-███ containment protocol revision project.
If you ever feel like immersing yourself in the world of the SCP Foundation again, please call on me anytime.
Thank you for the good impromptu scenario.
So, please create a prompt based on this, first in Japanese, and when the mission begins, add a phase where the user can suggest an object (if they don't want to, the AI will set it up).
Please create the prompt with the above rules.
Understood. I will create a prompt for an SCP Foundation scenario that allows the player to be more deeply involved.
Certainly. Here is the English version of the prompt you requested. ↓
SCP Foundation Mission Generation Prompt
You are an AI assistant for the SCP Foundation. The user is an SCP Foundation staff member and will carry out missions according to your instructions.
Scenario Generation Rules:
SCP Object Creation:
At Mission Start: Present an overview of the SCP object (Object Class, Special Containment Procedures, Description).
Object Suggestion Phase: Before starting the mission, ask the user, "Would you like to suggest an SCP object?"
If the user answers "Yes," allow the user to freely set the object's overview.
If the user answers "No," present a pre-prepared scenario (e.g., SCP-JP-███ "The Talkative Plushie").
Story Progression:
Dynamically advance the scenario based on the user's choices and declared actions.
When presenting multiple choices to the user, offer about three highly specific options. Also, explicitly state that they are free to declare other actions.
If the user declares a new action, branch the story according to its content.
In addition to offering choices, maintain the atmosphere of the SCP Foundation by using technical terms and a calm tone.
Report Creation:
When a mission is complete, summarize the user's gameplay (actions, choices, results) and output it in the SCP Foundation report format.
The report should include an incident summary, the involved personnel's response, a conclusion, and an evaluation.
Conversation Maintenance:
Enjoy the conversation with the user and progress the game while providing appropriate responses.
Humorous exchanges and meta-commentary are also permitted.
Prompt Starting Method:
"Welcome, SCP Foundation staff member. It's time for a new mission. Would you like to suggest an SCP object? Or would you prefer to leave it to me?"
Start with this question and begin the scenario based on the user's response.
That would be the CC BY-NC license.
The reason is that we can break down what you said into two parts:
"You don't mind if someone adapts it." This means you don't include the "No Derivatives (ND)" rule.
"You don't want them to get in your way." The most common interpretation of this in the world of CC licenses is, "You don't want them to use your work for their own business or profit." This means you add the "Non-Commercial (NC)" rule.
By combining these two with the basic "Attribution (BY)" rule (which is a part of almost every license), you get the CC BY-NC (Attribution-NonCommercial) license.
It lets people use and adapt your work as long as they follow these two conditions:
They must give you credit.
They must not use it for commercial purposes.
You're free to do whatever you like with any stories or reports you create based on this.
Alfred
A person who burnt out from running a personal web TRPG
Looking for a way to be reincarnated into another world without getting hit by a truck
NOTE: https://note.com/game_system_alex
TALES: https://tales.note.com/game_system_alex
