Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 1;64(9):1163-1170.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cix079.

Contribution to Clostridium Difficile Transmission of Symptomatic Patients With Toxigenic Strains Who Are Fecal Toxin Negative

Affiliations

Contribution to Clostridium Difficile Transmission of Symptomatic Patients With Toxigenic Strains Who Are Fecal Toxin Negative

Damian P C Mawer et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The role of symptomatic patients who are toxigenic strain positive (TS+) but fecal toxin negative (FT-) in transmission of Clostridium difficile is currently unknown.

Methods: We investigated the contribution of symptomatic TS+/FT- and TS+/FT+ patients in C. difficile transmission in 2 UK regions. From 2-step testing, all glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)-positive specimens, regardless of fecal toxin result, from Oxford (April 2012 through April 2013) and Leeds (July 2012 through April 2013) microbiology laboratories underwent culture and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), using WGS to identify toxigenic strains. Plausible sources for each TS+/FT+ case, including TS+/FT- and TS+/FT+ patients, were determined using WGS, with and without hospital admission data.

Results: A total of 1447 of 12772 (11%) fecal samples were GDH positive, 866 of 1447 (60%) contained toxigenic C. difficile, and fecal toxin was detected in 511 of 866 (59%), representing 235 Leeds and 191 Oxford TS+/FT+ cases. TS+/FT+ cases were 3 times more likely to be plausibly acquired from a previous TS+/FT+ case than a TS+/FT- patient. Fifty-one of 265 (19%) TS+/FT+ cases diagnosed >3 months into the study were genetically related (≤2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms) to ≥1 previous TS+/FT+ case or TS+/FT- patient: 27 (10%) to only TS+/FT+ cases, 9 (3%) to only TS+/FT- patients, and 15 (6%) to both. Only 10 of 265 (4%) were genetically related to a previous TS+/FT+ or TS+/FT- patient and shared the same ward simultaneously or within 28 days.

Conclusions: Symptomatic TS+/FT- patients were a source of C. difficile transmission, although they accounted for less onward transmission than TS+/FT+ cases. Although transmission from symptomatic patients with either fecal toxin status accounted for a low overall proportion of new cases, both groups should be infection control targets.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; fecal toxin; infection; transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Samples and patient demographics for Leeds (A) and Oxfordshire (B). Each percentage uses the row above as denominator. Distinct infection is >10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms distinct to any previous infection in the same patient. Age and sex were not recorded for 3 Oxfordshire patients. Abbreviations: CA, community-associated; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; HA, healthcare-associated; IQR, interquartile range; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; QC, quality control; UK, United Kingdom; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Numbers of patients in clusters related within ≤2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Clusters consisting exclusively of patients with toxigenic strain–positive, fecal toxin-negative (TS+/FT) Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are shown in blue, clusters consisting exclusively of TS+/FT+ cases in red, and clusters with both TS+/FT patients and TS+/FT+ cases in orange.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of Leeds and Oxfordshire Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) cases genetically related to a previous toxigenic strain–positive, fecal toxin-positive (TS+/FT+) case or TS+/FT patient within varying single-nucleotide polymorphism thresholds. Bars are shaded according to the fecal toxin status of the genetically related potensal sources of infection.

Comment in

  • Diagnosing an Infection Control Risk.
    Kutty PK, McDonald LC. Kutty PK, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;64(9):1171-1173. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix085. Clin Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28158635 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Public Health England. Annual epidemiological commentary: mandatory MRSA, MSSA and E. coli bacteraemia and C. difficile infection data, 2014/15 Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... Accessed 21 June 2016.
    1. Eyre DW, Cule ML, Wilson DJ, et al. Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1195–205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin J, Eyre DW, Fawley W, et al. C. difficile ribotypes exhibit variable patient-to- patient transmission rates, as determined by whole genome sequencing, suggesting differing reservoirs and modes of acquisition [abstract 0557]. In: 26th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease (ECCMID), 9–12 April 2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    1. Kumar N, Miyajima F, He M, et al. Genome-based infection tracking reveals dynamics of Clostridium difficile transmission and disease recurrence. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 62:1031–752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker AS, Eyre DW, Wyllie DH, et al. Characterisation of Clostridium difficile hospital ward-based transmission using extensive epidemiological data and molecular typing. PLoS Med 2012; 9:e1001172:1–12. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances