Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 22:8:2584.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02584. eCollection 2017.

Antibiotic Resistance and Toxin Production of Clostridium difficile Isolates from the Hospitalized Patients in a Large Hospital in Florida

Affiliations

Antibiotic Resistance and Toxin Production of Clostridium difficile Isolates from the Hospitalized Patients in a Large Hospital in Florida

Zhong Peng et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is an important cause of nosocomial acquired antibiotic-associated diarrhea causing an estimated 453,000 cases with 29,000 deaths yearly in the U.S. Both antibiotic resistance and toxin expression of C. difficile correlate with the severity of C. difficile infection (CDI). In this report, a total of 139 C. difficile isolates from patients diagnosed with CDI in Tampa General Hospital (Florida) in 2016 were studied for antibiotic resistance profiles of 12 types of antibiotics and toxin production. Antibiotic resistance determined by broth microdilution method showed that strains resistant to multi-antibiotics are common. Six strains (4.32%) showed resistance to six types of antibiotics. Twenty strains (14.39%) showed resistance to five types of antibiotics. Seventeen strains (12.24%) showed resistance to four types of antibiotics. Thirty-nine strains (28.06%) showed resistance to three types of antibiotic. Thirty-four strains (24.46%) showed resistance to two types of antibiotics. While, all isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, and rifaximin, we found that one isolate (0.72%) displayed resistance to vancomycin (MIC ≥ 8 μg/ml), and another one was resistant to fidaxomicin (MIC >1 μg/ml). The percentage of isolates resistant to cefoxitin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin was 75.54, 10.79, 5.76, 67.63, 82.70, 45.32, 28.06, and 28.78%, respectively. Toxin profiling by PCR showed the isolates include 101 (72.66%) A+B+CDT-strains, 23 (16.55%) A+B+CDT+ strains, 3 (2.16%) A-B+CDT+ strains, 1 (0.72%) A-B+CDT-strains, and 11 (7.91%) A-B-CDT-strains. Toxin production determined by ELISA using supernatants of bacterial culture harvested at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h of post inoculation (hpi) showed that the toxins were mainly produced between 48 and 72 hpi, and toxin B (TcdB) was produced faster than toxin A (TcdA) during the experimental time (72 hpi). In addition, the binary-positive strains were likely to yield more toxins compared to the binary-negative strains. This work contributes to the current understanding of the antibiotic resistance and virulence of C. difficile clinical strains.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; antibiotic resistance; broth microdilution; toxin production; toxin-type.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pie Chart showing the distribution of toxin type among the 139 C. difficile clinical strains.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average concentrations of TcdA and TcdB produced by C. difficile strains of different toxigenic types from all 139 strains at different time points. (A) The average concentrations of TcdA determined at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation. (B) The average concentrations of TcdB determined at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h post inoculation. (C) The average concentrations of TcdA and TcdB in all C. difficile A+B+CDT+ strains. (D) The average concentrations of TcdA and TcdB in all C. difficile A+B+CDT-strains.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Resistance patterns of C. difficile isolates to antibiotics most frequently associated with CDI. The number of isolates that displayed resistance patterns to CDI-associated antibiotics and their percentage were listed at the right side of the column. FOX, cefoxitin; CRO, ceftriaxone; AMP, ampicillin; CLI, clindamycin; GAT, gatifloxacin; MXF, moxifloxacine.

References

    1. Adler A., Miller-Roll T., Bradenstein R., Block C., Mendelson B., Parizade M., et al. (2015). A national survey of the molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile in Israel: the dissemination of the ribotype 027 strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and metronidazole. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 83, 21–24. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.05.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Álvarez-Pérez S., Blanco J. L., Harmanus C., Kuijper E., García M. E. (2017). Subtyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078/126 isolates of human and animal origin. Vet. Microbiol. 199, 15–22. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aschbacher R., Indra A., Wiedermann C., March A., Giacon B., Mian P., et al. (2017). Predominance of Clostridium difficile 027 during a five-year period in Bolzano, Northern Italy. Infez. Med. 25, 13–20. - PubMed
    1. Bacci S. (2011). Binary toxin and death after Clostridium difficile Infection. Emerg. Infect. Diseases 17, 976–982. 10.3201/eid/1706.101483 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baines S. D., Wilcox M. H. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance and reduced susceptibility in Clostridium difficile: potential consequences for induction, treatment, and recurrence of C. difficile infection. Antibiotics 4, 267–298. 10.3390/antibiotics4030267 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources