Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences
- PMID: 32310942
- PMCID: PMC7170218
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008565
Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences
Abstract
Preprints are gaining visibility in many fields. Thanks to the exponential growth in submissions to bioRxiv, an online server for preprints in biology, versions of manuscripts prior to the completion of journal-organized peer review are poised to become a standard component of the publishing experience in the life sciences. Here, we provide an overview of current challenges facing preprints, both technical and social, and a vision for their future development.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal's policy and have the following conflicts: JP and NP are employees of ASAPbio, a non-profit organization promoting the productive use of preprints. JP is a Plan S ambassador. JP and NP are on the PREreview Steering Committee, an advisory body.
References
-
- Tregenza T. Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends Ecol Evol. 2002. August 1;17(8):349–50.
-
- Shen YA, Webster JM, Shoda Y, Fine I. Persistent Underrepresentation of Women’s Science in High Profile Journals. bioRxiv. 2018. March 8;275362.
-
- Murray D, Siler K, Larivière V, Chan WM, Collings AM, Raymond J, et al. Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review. bioRxiv. 2019. April 11;400515.
-
- Royle S. Waiting to happen II: Publication lag times [Internet]. quantixed. 2015. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20190412012435/http://quantixed.org/2015/03/1.... [cited 2019 May 31].
-
- Himmelstein D. Publication delays at PLOS and 3,475 other journals. Satoshi Village [Internet]. 2015 Jun 29. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20180503071358/http://blog.dhimmel.com/plos-a.... [cited 2019 May 31].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
