What is an estimand & how does it relate to quantifying the effect of treatment on patient-reported quality of life outcomes in clinical trials?
- PMID: 32833083
- PMCID: PMC7445213
- DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00218-5
What is an estimand & how does it relate to quantifying the effect of treatment on patient-reported quality of life outcomes in clinical trials?
Abstract
Background: Published in 2019, a new addendum to the ICH E9 guideline presents the estimand framework as a systematic approach to ensure alignment among clinical trial objectives, trial execution/conduct, statistical analyses, and interpretation of results. The use of the estimand framework for describing clinical trial objectives has yet to be extensively considered in the context of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We discuss the application of the estimand framework to PRO objectives when designing clinical trials in the future, with a focus on PRO outcomes in oncology trial settings as our example. MAIN: We describe the components of an estimand and take a naïve PRO trial objective to illustrate how to apply attributes described in the estimand framework to inform construction of a detailed clinical trial objective and its related estimand. We discuss identifying potential post-randomization events that alter the interpretation of the endpoint or render its observation impossible (also defined as intercurrent events) in the context of PRO endpoints, and the implications of how to handle intercurrent events in the construction of the PRO objective. Using a simple objective statement, "What is the effect of treatment X on patient's quality of life?", we build up an example estimand statement and also use a previously published phase III oncology clinical trial to illustrate how an estimand for a PRO objective could have been written to align to the estimate framework.
Conclusion: The use of the estimand framework, as described in the new ICH E9 (R1) addendum guideline will become a key common framework for developing clinical trial objectives for evaluating effects of treatment. In the context of considering PROs, the framework provides an opportunity to more precisely specify and build the rationale for patient-focused objectives. This will help to ensure that clinical trials used for registration are designed and analysed appropriately, enabling all stakeholders to accurately interpret conclusions about the treatment effects for patient-focused outcomes.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Design; Estimand; HRQoL; ICH; Objective; PRO; Patient; Treatment effect.
Conflict of interest statement
RL, PG and KC are employees of Adelphi Values, which provides consultancy services to the Pharmaceutical industry. Other authors are employees of Pharmaceutical companies: ED is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. PT is an employee of Genentech. HL and DA are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals corporation. IG and GW are employees of Boehringer-Ingelheim, Kaspar Rufibach is an employee of F.Hoffmann-La Roche.
The authors declare that they have other no competing interests in this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Institute of Medicine . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. 2001. - PubMed
-
- International Council for Harmonisation . Addendum on estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials to the guideline om statistical principles for clinical trials E9(R) 2019.
-
- Coens C, Pe M, Dueck AC, et al. International standards for the analysis of quality of life and patient reported outcomes endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials; recommendations based on critical reviews of the literature and international multi-expert, multi-stakeholder collaborative process. The Lancet Oncology. 2020;21:e83–e96. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30790-9. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
