Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1196-1210.
doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab001.

Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Magnesium Intakes and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Total, Dietary, and Supplemental Magnesium Intakes and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

Amir Bagheri et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

A meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted to examine the association of total, supplemental, and dietary magnesium intakes with risk of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and identify the dose-response relations involved in these association. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ISI Web of Knowledge up to April 2020. Prospective cohort studies that reported risk estimates for the association between total, supplemental, and dietary magnesium intakes and risk of mortality were included. Random effects models were used. Nineteen publication with a total of 1,168,756 participants were included in the current meta-analysis. In total, 52,378 deaths from all causes, 23,478 from CVD, and 11,408 from cancer were identified during the follow-up period of 3.5 to 32 years. Dietary magnesium intake was associated with a lower risk of all-cause [pooled effect size (ES): 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.97; P = 0.009; I2 = 70.7%; P < 0.001] and cancer mortality (pooled ES: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.97; P = 0.023; I2 = 55.7%; P = 0.027), but not with CVD mortality (pooled ES: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.82, 1.07; P = 0.313; I2 = 72.3%; P < 0.001). For supplemental and total magnesium intakes, we did not find any significant associations with risks of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. However, linear dose-response meta-analysis indicated that each additional intake of 100 mg/d of dietary magnesium was associated with a 6% and 5% reduced risk of all-cause and cancer mortality, respectively. In conclusion, higher intake of dietary magnesium was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and cancer mortality, but not CVD mortality. Supplemental and total magnesium intakes were not associated with the risk of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality. These findings indicate that consumption of magnesium from dietary sources may be beneficial in reducing all-cause and cancer mortality and thus have practical importance for public health.

Keywords: cancer; cardiovascular disease; death; diet; magnesium; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Forest plot for association between total, dietary, and supplemental magnesium intakes and risk of all-cause mortality. Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot for association between total, dietary, and supplemental magnesium intakes and risk of cardiovascular mortality. Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot for association between total, dietary, and supplemental magnesium intakes and risk of cancer mortality. Diamonds represent pooled estimates from random-effects analysis.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Nonlinear dose–response results. (A) Total magnesium intake and all-cause mortality. (B) Dietary magnesium intake and all-cause mortality. (C) Total magnesium intake and cancer mortality. (D) Dietary magnesium intake and cancer mortality. (E) Dietary magnesium intake and cardiovascular mortality. Dietary and total magnesium intakes were modeled with restricted cubic splines in a multivariate random-effects dose–response model. It should be noted that the number of ESs for conducting nonlinear association between total magnesium intake and risk of cardiovascular mortality was inadequate; therefore, the analysis for this was not done. The black line indicates the linear model; the solid black line indicates the spline model and the dotted lines represent 95% CIs. ES, effect size.

References

    1. Raymond JL, Mahan LK. Krause and Mahan’s food and the nutrition care process. 15th Edition. Health sciences division: Elsevier; 2020.
    1. Veronese N, Zanforlini BM, Manzato E, Sergi G. Magnesium and healthy aging. Magnes Res. 2015;28(3):112–5. - PubMed
    1. Volpe SL. Magnesium in disease prevention and overall health. Adv Nutr. 2013;4(3):378S–83S. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosanoff A, Weaver CM, Rude RK. Suboptimal magnesium status in the United States: are the health consequences underestimated? Nutr Rev. 2012;70(3):153–64. - PubMed
    1. Rosanoff A. Rising Ca: Mg intake ratio from food in USA adults: a concern?. Magnes Res. 2010;23(4):S181–93. - PubMed