The legacy of the reformasi: the role of local government spending on industrial development in a decentralized Indonesia
- PMID: 35342684
- PMCID: PMC8934020
- DOI: 10.1186/s40008-022-00262-y
The legacy of the reformasi: the role of local government spending on industrial development in a decentralized Indonesia
Abstract
Starting in 2001 the Government of Indonesia employed the Regional Autonomy Law, providing larger fiscal role to the province and district governments. However, our understanding of its impacts on development in Indonesia is still limited. This paper seeks to find the relationship between increasing local governments' capital expenditure and industrial development with focus in the non-oil and gas sector. Capital spending is thought to have moderation effect on investment, the main channel for industrialization, that should contribute to industrial growth. Our System GMM results suggest that there are positive and significant correlations between capital spending and industrial growth, presenting evidence of local governments' role. However, we fail to find significant moderation effect between local capital spending and industrial investment towards the sector's growth. This poses problem for industrialization at the local level. Decentralization progress in Indonesia has been institutionally anchored by the central government, particularly with the introduction of concurrent affairs in 2004 that allowed Jakarta to take a major developmental role in districts and provinces at the cost of lesser local governments' role. Our study proposes a new institutional model that promote better central-local collaboration.
Keywords: Capital spending; Decentralization; Industrial development; Investment; Local government.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the writing of this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. London: Profile; 2013.
-
- Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA, Yared P. Income and democracy. Am Econ Rev. 2008;98(3):808–842. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.3.808. - DOI
-
- Ahmad J, Devarajan S, Khemani S, Shah S (2005) Decentralization and service delivery: world bank policy research working paper 3603. World Bank
-
- Ahn SC, Schmidt P. Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel-data. J Econom. 1995;68(1):5–27. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01641-C. - DOI
-
- Alfada A. Does Fiscal decentralization encourage corruption in local governments? Evidence from Indonesia. J Risk Financ Manag. 2019 doi: 10.3390/Jrfm12030118. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources