Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul 19:48:101098.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101098. eCollection 2024 Jul.

The co-benefits of climate change mitigation strategies on cardiovascular health: a systematic review

Pallavi Shrestha  1 , Sai Keerthana Nukala  1 , Fariha Islam  1 , Tim Badgery-Parker  2 , Fiona Foo  1
Affiliations

The co-benefits of climate change mitigation strategies on cardiovascular health: a systematic review

Pallavi Shrestha et al. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. .

Abstract

Background: Climate change is a significant threat to global human health and a leading cause of premature death. Global warming, leading to more extreme weather (in particular extreme heat events), and air pollution has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, 62% of the deaths attributable to climate change were from CVD. Climate change mitigation is a slow, steady process, and the concept of co-benefits has arisen to promote climate action. This systematic review examines how numerous mitigation strategies, such as plant-based diets, increasing green spaces, increasing active transport, using renewable energy sources, and smoking cessation, may have the co-benefit of reducing CVD.

Methods: A mixed methods systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted on four databases, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The articles retrieved (published between 2012 and 2022) had a mitigation strategy as the exposure, and CVD related morbidity or mortality reduction as an outcome.

Findings: The review found that renewable energy has a stronger association with cardiovascular co-benefits compared to emission reduction targets. Multimodal transport is more beneficial for both the climate and cardiac health than zero emission vehicles. Diet modification, such as Mediterranean and plant-based-diets, is positively associated with CVD reduction. Proximity to green spaces and reducing urbanisation may also improve cardiac health.

Interpretation: This systematic review demonstrates that implementing four mitigation strategies - increasing renewable energy use, active transport, green spaces, and plant-based diets; could lead to the co-benefit of reducing CVD morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, it illustrates the importance of plant-based diets and active transport to improve cardiovascular health.

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Keywords: Active transport; Cardiac disease; Cardiovascular disease; Climate change; Co-benefits; Green spaces; Mitigation; Mitigation strategies; Plant-based diets; Renewable energy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pathway of Mitigation Strategies resulting cardiovascular disease., ,
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow diagram of screening process.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of critical appraisal using Newcastle Ottawa Scale and adapted Jarmul et al. checklist.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Reduction of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality rates based on percentage.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Reduction of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality rates based on percentage excluding modelling studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kotcher J., Maibach E., Miller J., et al. Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5(5):e316–e323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaw C., Hales S., Howden-Chapman P., Edwards R. Health co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies in the transport sector. Nat Clim Change. 2014;4(6):427–433.
    1. Prüss-Üstün A., Wolf J., Corvalán C., Bos R., Neira M. World Health Organization; 2016. Preventing disease through healthy environments: a global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks.
    1. Harikrishnan S., Jeemon P., Mini G., Thankappan K., Sylaja P., GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–1788. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaduganathan M., Mensah G.A., Turco J.V., Fuster V., Roth G.A. American College of Cardiology Foundation; Washington, DC: 2022. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk: a compass for future health; pp. 2361–2371. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources