Free review · Blunt AI critique

Free AI Resume Roast & ATS Checker

Upload a PDF to see your ATS score, missing keywords, and line-by-line fixes. 3 free reviews on signup.

See a real review
3 free on signup
PDF parsed locally
Not kept after review
Start here

Upload your resume. Find the screening blockers.

Every review checks these three things

  • ATS readability
  • Keyword gaps
  • Concrete fixes

What a roast looks like

  • Fatal

    "Helped with" is doing all the work in this bullet — a recruiter can tell you were in the room, not on the hook.

  • Major

    Three years of frontend, and the project section reads like an intern diary.

How To

3-step roast

Not vague praise or a generic scorecard. It reads the content, then flags fluff like a tired hiring desk.

01

Drop PDF

Parse in-browser. Private by default.

02

Get roasted

AI finds weak spots and blind angles.

03

Fix fast

Ship clear edits for your job hunt.

Examples

Worked examples

Illustrative rewrites showing how the fixes land—not real user resumes.

Before / After

Not tiny tweaks—turn vague bullets into evidence hiring teams keep reading.

Tech · Frontend+47pts (example)
Before
42
After
89
Roast

3 years in, still reads like intern work—stack dump, no depth.

Fix

Quantify outcomes; show hard problems and how you solved them.

Finance · Risk+36pts (example)
Before
55
After
91
Roast

Summary is fluff; experience lacks hard numbers.

Fix

Lead with metrics and business impact.

Ecom · PM+47pts (example)
Before
38
After
85
Roast

PRDs read like checklists—no product judgment.

Fix

Structure stories around user value and revenue.

Why ATS

Most large firms screen resumes with ATS

If ATS cannot parse your resume, it may die before a human ever opens it. Adoption estimates vary by company size and vendor surveys.

Widespread
ATS use among mid-size and large employers (exact rates vary by study)
Common risk
parsing failures caused by tables, columns, or image-only PDFs
Keywords
Decisive

having required keywords next to real experience evidence

Boost your ATS score

1

Standard headers

Use Work Experience / Education—not “My Story”—so ATS can map sections.

2

Match job keywords

Mirror core skills from the posting. ATS ranks by keyword fit.

3

Skip complex layout

Tables and text boxes break parsers. Keep plain bullets and fonts.

4

Text-based PDF

Export selectable text from Word/Docs—not a scan.

5

Quantify wins

“+30% conversion” beats “responsible for growth.” Numbers win.

6

Keep 1–2 pages

Unless academia, stay concise. ATS and recruiters prefer it.

These three are checks, not measured statistics. Public career-service references and industry surveys describe ATS use as widespread among mid-size and large employers, but precise figures such as "90%" depend on sample, company size, and methodology—and no single algorithm applies to every company. Structure guidance here follows Harvard Career Services and Europass. Read the full, sourced answer in our ATS guide: /resources/do-most-employers-use-ats

FAQ

Quick answers

Covers privacy, formats, and accuracy. Tone can be sharp; product limits stay clear.

Resume Roast is a bilingual AI resume roaster and ATS checker at roastresume.online. Upload a selectable-text PDF resume, optionally paste a target job description, and receive an ATS-oriented score, keyword gaps, parsing risks, and line-by-line rewrite guidance. The product is built for job seekers who need a fast, blunt second pair of eyes before they apply—not for anyone seeking a hiring guarantee. PDF text is extracted in the browser; the original file is not uploaded, and resume content is not kept as a long-term library after analysis. New users get free review credits on signup. Paid packs unlock more reviews and copy-ready rewrites. Always combine automated notes with role-specific human judgment. See how scoring works in our methodology guide.
An ATS resume checker evaluates whether hiring software can reliably parse and retrieve your resume—not a single universal ranking number. Typical checks include standard section headings, natural plain-text reading order, consistent dates next to roles, readable contact details, and whether important skills appear next to experience evidence. If you paste a job description, the tool can also compare posting language with the wording in your resume. Employers use different ATS products and settings, and no public algorithm applies to every company. The practical goal is to reduce extraction errors and place role-relevant evidence in predictable sections. Treat any claim of one guaranteed universal ATS score with skepticism, and run a plain-text copy test before you submit.
A plain score aggregates dimensions but often reduces your attention to one number. A free AI resume review on Resume Roast emphasizes line-level markup: each finding tries to point back to a specific sentence or writing pattern in your resume, explain what it may cost you in screening, and suggest a rewrite direction. The product also uses a severity rating from still savable to start over so you can triage how deep the rewrite needs to be within seconds. Severity is a time-budget signal, not a verdict on your career. Skip any rewrite you cannot support with real work. The useful loop is: fix fatal and major issues first, align evidence with the job description, re-test, then compare scores and critique counts after each revision.
To make a resume stand out, do not chase a flashier template. Make three answers obvious within a ten-second scan: who you are, what you have done, and where the evidence sits. Work in this order: write a summary with direction, years of scope, and one strongest proof point—not a slogan; rewrite duty bullets as action + object + method + result instead of responsible for or participated in; place target-job keywords next to real experience rather than dumping them in a skills list; cut unverifiable percentages and inflated titles; export a selectable-text PDF with a natural section order. Then run a free resume roast to check whether red flags are gone, keyword gaps are closed, and critique counts drop after each revision. Standing out means evidence density and job fit, not more adjectives.
PDF parsing happens in your browser. The original resume is not uploaded, and resume content is not kept long term after analysis.
The tool supports selectable-text PDF resumes. Scanned, image-only, or encrypted PDFs may not be read accurately.
Yes. Add a job description to compare its keywords and requirements with your resume.
No. Use it to identify common issues and improvement opportunities, then apply your own role and industry judgment.
Yes. After the free quota is used, sign in or choose a plan to continue reviewing resumes.
💎 Clear pricing

Pick your pack

Problems are free. Fixes are pay-per-use. Packs don’t expire; Sprint matches a two-week search.

Free

3 free reviews on signup

$0on signup
  • 3 free reviews on signup
  • Full blunt callouts
  • ATS + format scores
  • Keyword gaps + quick wins

Starter Pack

5 full reviews. Credits don’t expire.

$3 once
  • 5 reviews with rewrites
  • Full chain + hiring-manager fit
  • Line-by-line rewrites
  • Good for one solid revision

Sprint

For the two weeks you actually apply

$6/14 days
  • 12 reviews in 14 days
  • Full chain + rewrites
  • Built for dense applications
  • Cheapest way to get 12+ reviews

Unused credits expire after the 14 days.

Best value

Pro Pack

20 reviews for multi-role iteration

$9 once
  • 20 reviews with rewrites
  • Full chain + hiring-manager fit
  • Credits don’t expire
  • For several roles / versions

One-time purchase, no auto-renew