Free AI Resume Roast & ATS Checker
Upload a PDF to see your ATS score, missing keywords, and line-by-line fixes. 3 free reviews on signup.
Upload your resume. Find the screening blockers.
Every review checks these three things
After you upload- ATS readability
- Keyword gaps
- Concrete fixes
What a roast looks like
- Fatal
"Helped with" is doing all the work in this bullet — a recruiter can tell you were in the room, not on the hook.
- Major
Three years of frontend, and the project section reads like an intern diary.
3-step roast
Not vague praise or a generic scorecard. It reads the content, then flags fluff like a tired hiring desk.
Drop PDF
Parse in-browser. Private by default.
Get roasted
AI finds weak spots and blind angles.
Fix fast
Ship clear edits for your job hunt.
Worked examples
Illustrative rewrites showing how the fixes land—not real user resumes.
Not tiny tweaks—turn vague bullets into evidence hiring teams keep reading.
3 years in, still reads like intern work—stack dump, no depth.
Quantify outcomes; show hard problems and how you solved them.
Summary is fluff; experience lacks hard numbers.
Lead with metrics and business impact.
PRDs read like checklists—no product judgment.
Structure stories around user value and revenue.
Most large firms screen resumes with ATS
If ATS cannot parse your resume, it may die before a human ever opens it. Adoption estimates vary by company size and vendor surveys.
having required keywords next to real experience evidence
Boost your ATS score
Standard headers
Use Work Experience / Education—not “My Story”—so ATS can map sections.
Match job keywords
Mirror core skills from the posting. ATS ranks by keyword fit.
Skip complex layout
Tables and text boxes break parsers. Keep plain bullets and fonts.
Text-based PDF
Export selectable text from Word/Docs—not a scan.
Quantify wins
“+30% conversion” beats “responsible for growth.” Numbers win.
Keep 1–2 pages
Unless academia, stay concise. ATS and recruiters prefer it.
These three are checks, not measured statistics. Public career-service references and industry surveys describe ATS use as widespread among mid-size and large employers, but precise figures such as "90%" depend on sample, company size, and methodology—and no single algorithm applies to every company. Structure guidance here follows Harvard Career Services and Europass. Read the full, sourced answer in our ATS guide: /resources/do-most-employers-use-ats
Quick answers
Covers privacy, formats, and accuracy. Tone can be sharp; product limits stay clear.
Learn the rules before you rewrite.
Break ATS, keywords, and role fit into separate checks. The resource hub brings together practical guides and trusted career references.
Open the resource hubPick your pack
Problems are free. Fixes are pay-per-use. Packs don’t expire; Sprint matches a two-week search.
Free
3 free reviews on signup
- 3 free reviews on signup
- Full blunt callouts
- ATS + format scores
- Keyword gaps + quick wins
Starter Pack
5 full reviews. Credits don’t expire.
- 5 reviews with rewrites
- Full chain + hiring-manager fit
- Line-by-line rewrites
- Good for one solid revision
Sprint
For the two weeks you actually apply
- 12 reviews in 14 days
- Full chain + rewrites
- Built for dense applications
- Cheapest way to get 12+ reviews
Unused credits expire after the 14 days.
Pro Pack
20 reviews for multi-role iteration
- 20 reviews with rewrites
- Full chain + hiring-manager fit
- Credits don’t expire
- For several roles / versions
One-time purchase, no auto-renew