2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3680-7
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies

Abstract: PurposeSome studies suggest that also regarding the patient with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 the minimally invasive approach to hysterectomy is superior. However, current practice and research on the preference of gynaecologists still show that the rate of abdominal hysterectomy (AH) increases as the BMI increases. A systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies was performed to evaluate the outcomes of AH, laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) in very obese and… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
50
17
9
1

Citation Types

4
39
0
3

Year Published

Range
2016
2016
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
62
5
2
1

Relationship

0
70

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 70 publications

(46 citation statements)
references

References 63 publications

4
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Regarding early postoperative complications, wound dehiscence remains a prominent concern, as it is associated with prolonged hospital stays 22,25 . Consistent with prior research, 8,23 our study found that LRH patients experienced fewer wound complications and shorter recovery times compared to ORH patients.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding early postoperative complications, wound dehiscence remains a prominent concern, as it is associated with prolonged hospital stays. 22,25 Consistent with prior research, 8,23 our study found that LRH patients experienced fewer wound complications and shorter recovery times compared to ORH patients. Although hospital stay duration is influenced by local cultural practices, institutional policies, and reimbursement systems, the median hospital stay in our LRH cohort was shorter than in the ORH group.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation