- NEWS
Science sleuths flag hundreds of papers that use AI without disclosing it
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 641, 290-291 (2025)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01180-2
References
Bader, R. et al. Radiol. Case Rep. 19, 2106–2111 (2024); retraction 19, 3598 (2024).
Glynn, A. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.15218 (2024).
Strzelecki, A. Learn. Publ. 28, e1650 (2024).
Shoukat, R. et al. PLoS ONE 19, e0298220 (2024); retraction 19, e0302484 (2024).
Abdel-Rahman Mohamed, A. et al. Toxicology 497–498, 153629 (2023).
Aquarius, R., Schoeters, F., Wise, N., Glynn, A. & Cabanac, G. Learn. Publ. 38, e1660 (2025).
Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing
Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers
Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch — but is it any good?
ChatGPT is transforming peer review — how can we use it responsibly?
Forget ChatGPT: why researchers now run small AIs on their laptops
Need a policy for using ChatGPT in the classroom? Try asking students
Chatbots in science: What can ChatGPT do for you?
How does ChatGPT ‘think’? Psychology and neuroscience crack open AI large language models