Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

What we do and don't know about 'race', 'ethnicity', genetics and health at the dawn of the genome era

A true understanding of disease risk requires a thorough examination of root causes. 'Race' and 'ethnicity' are poorly defined terms that serve as flawed surrogates for multiple environmental and genetic factors in disease causation, including ancestral geographic origins, socioeconomic status, education and access to health care. Research must move beyond these weak and imperfect proxy relationships to define the more proximate factors that influence health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Interconnections between self-identified race or ethnicity and health status.

References

  1. Angier, N. Do races differ? Not really, genes show. The New York Times Aug. 22, F1 (2000).

  2. Marshall, E. DNA studies challenge the meaning of race. Science 282, 654–655 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg, N.A. et al. Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298, 2381–2385 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankar, P. et al. Genetic research and health disparities. JAMA 291, 2985–2989 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Inoue, N. et al. Lack of common NOD2 variants in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 123, 86–91 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bamshad, M., Wooding, S., Salisbury, B.A. & Stephens, J.C. Deconstructing the relationship between genetics and race. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 598–608 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, R.S., Kaufman, J.S. & Ward, R. Race and genomics. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1166–1170 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burchard, E.G. et al. The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and practice. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1170–1175 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, F.S., Green, E.D., Guttmacher, A.E. & Guyer, M.S. A vision for the future of genomics research: A blueprint for the genomic era. Nature 422, 835–847 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins, F.S. The case for a U.S. prospective cohort study of genes and environment. Nature 429, 475–477 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. The International HapMap Consortium. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426, 789–796 (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank V. Bonham for assistance in preparing this commentary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collins, F. What we do and don't know about 'race', 'ethnicity', genetics and health at the dawn of the genome era. Nat Genet 36 (Suppl 11), S13–S15 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1436

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1436

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing