These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
The Self-organizing Schema Schemas resurface also in
the work of the Australian mathematician Michael Arbib. Just like with Minsky’s frames and Schank’s scripts, Arbib argues that the mind constructs reality through a
network of countless schemas. And, again, a schema is both a mental
representation of the world and a process that determines action in the world. Arbib's theory of schemas is
based on two notions, one developed by a US mathematician of the 19th century,
Charles Peirce, and one due to the Swiss
psychologist Jean Piaget of the 1930s. The first one is the notion of a "habit",
a set of operational rules that, by exhibiting both stability and adaptability,
lends itself to an evolutionary process. The second one is the notion of a
"schema", the generalizable characteristics of an action that allow
the application of the same action to a different context (yet another
variation on Selz). Both assume that schemas
are compounded as they are built to yield successive levels of a cognitive
hierarchy. Arbib argues that categories
are not innate, they are constructed through the individual's experience. What
is innate is the process that underlies the construction of categories.
Therefore, Arbib’s view of the rules of categories is similar to Noam Chomsky's view of the rules of language. What sets Arbib’s theory
apart from Minsky’s and Schank’s is that Arbib’s theory is more closely modeled after a view of the
brain as an evolving self-organizing system of interconnected units, e.g. with
neural networks. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Cognition: A General Property of Matter " | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|