These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
One could argue that ancient
gods simply represent concepts. As concepts were forming in human minds, human
minds expressed them as concepts. And their interaction yielded religions. Ancient gods represented
qualities, mountains, rivers, forces of nature, emotions. Gods were vehicles
for natural forces to express themselves. Gods were created for each new
phenomenon or discovery. Ancient religions were systems of concepts: they
classified and organized concepts through a network of legends (symbolic
narratives) and a series of rites (symbolic actions) in a manner not too
different from how Marvin Minsky’s “frame” organizes knowledge. A legend expressed the function of the
force in nature and in relation to other forces. A rite expressed the attributes
of the force. They were “local”: each
culture developed different sets based on local circumstances. As lower concepts gave rise
to higher, more complex concepts, old gods were replaced by new gods (e.g., the
god of thunder or of the Nile was replaced by the god of fertility or of
harvest). New gods were created as the mind progressed from purely
narrative/literal concepts to more and more abstract concepts. At some point there arose
the concept of all concepts, the concept of Nature itself, the concept of the
supreme power and of everything that exists, of the force that is behind all
other forces. Thus monotheistic religion was born. God became not the vehicle
for a force but “the” force itself. Religion is, ultimately, a
way to pass culture (a system of concepts) on to future generations. People of
different religions have not only different rites (physical lives) but also
different mental lives, because they think according to different conceptual
systems. There is no one-to-one correspondence between Roman gods and Indian
gods, and that explains why ancient Rome and ancient India were completely
different societies: they had completely different concepts, i.e. people
thought in completely different manners. In that sense, monotheistic
religion represents a major leap forward in cognitive skills. Just like the
zero enabled higher mathematics and the Roman arch enabled taller buildings, so
the single-god religion enabled higher thinking. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Dreams" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|