These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
Directed Cognition The US psychologist Ulric
Neisser refined this thesis. He defined
cognition as the skill of dealing with knowledge that comes from the
environment. The mind developed to cope with that knowledge. Neisser agrees with Gibson that organisms "pick
up" information from the environment, but he differs from Gibson in that
he argues in favor of directionality of exploration by the organism: the
organism is not completely passive in the hands of the environment, but somehow
it has a cognitive apparatus that directs its search for information. Neisser wondered how the brain recognizes an object.
Comparing a visual experience with all known objects is just too
time-consuming. But comparing a visual experience with all known objects “that
make sense” in that situation is much more feasible. Using a variant of Edward
Tolman’s
cognitive maps, Neisser concluded that the brain probably “knows” in advance
which objects are more likely to be “seen” in a certain situation. Some
“anticipatory schemas” narrow down the set of objects that one “expects” to
find in that certain situation. If I enter a restaurant, I will not expect to
see a couch, but I will expect to see tables and chairs. This makes it much
easier for my brain to recognize a table for a table. Some kind of schemas
accounts for how the organism can gather the available information from the
environment. Between perception and
action there exists a direct relation, one that is expressed by schemas. A schema is a blueprint for what information
the organism presumes to encounter and what that information entails in the
environment. The organism selects information from the environment based on its
anticipatory schemas. "We can see only what we know how to look for".
At every instant the organism constructs anticipations of information that make
it easy to pick it up when it becomes available. Once picked up, information
may, in turn, result in a change of the original schema, to direct further
exploration of the environment. Perception is therefore a perennial cycle, from
schemas to action (schemas direct action) to information (action picks up
information) to schemas (information modifies schemas). The schema accounts for
adaptive behavior while conserving the preeminence of cognitive processes. Neisser’s "cyclical" theory of perception also explains how the mind
"filters" the huge amount of information that would exceed its
capacity. An orienting schema of the
nearby environment, a "cognitive map", guides the organism around the
environment. A cognitive map contains schemas of the objects in the environment
and spatial relations between the objects.
Perception is not about
classifying objects in categories, creating concepts or any other sophisticated cognitive process.
Perception is about using the information available in the surroundings for the
purpose of directing action in it. Perception and cognition
transform the perceiver: an organism "is" the cognitive acts in which
it engages. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Ecological Realism: The Embodied Mind" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|