These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
Holism: Meaning is Relative The US philosopher Willard
Quine was the messiah of holism. Quine's theory of
"under-determination" originated in the sciences. Quine was profoundly influenced by an
argument put forth by the French physicist Pierre Duhem: that hypotheses cannot be tested in isolation from the whole
theoretical network in which they appear. Quine argued that an hypothesis is
verified true or false only relative to background assumptions. For every empirical datum
there can be an infinite number of theories that explain it. Science simply picks the combination of
hypotheses that seems more plausible.
When a hypothesis fails, the scientist can always modify the other
hypotheses to make it hold. There is no certain way to determine what has to be
changed in a theory: any hypothesis can be retained as true or discarded as
false by performing appropriate adjustments in the overall network of
assumptions. No sentence has special
epistemic properties that safeguard it from revision. The so called Quine-Duhem
thesis reads: no part of a scientific theory can be proved or disproved; only
the whole can. Ultimately, science is but
self-conscious common sense. Language is a special case.
The empirical datum in this case is a discourse and the theory is its meaning.
There are infinite interpretations of a discourse depending on the context. A
single word has no meaning: its referent is "inscrutable". The meaning of language is not even in the
mind of the speaker. It is a natural phenomenon related to the world of that
speaker. Quine thinks that the
meaning of a statement is the method that can verify it empirically. But verification of a statement within a
theory depends on the set of all other statements of the theory. Each statement in a theory partially
determines the meaning of every other statement in the same theory. In particular, the truth of
a statement cannot be assessed as a function of the meaning of its words. An
individual statement can be proved true or false only relative to the theory
they belong to. Words do not have an absolute meaning. They have a meaning only
relative to the other words they are connected to in the sentences that we
assume to be true. The meaning of a sentence depends on the interpretation of
the entire language. Its meaning can even change in time. In general, the structure of
concepts is determined by the positions that their constituents occupy in the
"web of belief" of the individual.
In particular, it is
impossible to define what a "correct" translation of a statement is
from one language to another, because that depends on the interpretations of
both entire languages. Translation from one language to another is
indeterminate. Meaning has no meaning. The
only concept that makes sense for interpreting sentences is truth. A sentence
can be true or false, but what it refers to is not meaningful. Technically, Quines ideas
can be expressed in terms of variables. Values of variables cannot be fixed
until the interpretation of the whole formal system is fixed (because of a
famous theorem in mathematics, the Loewenheim-Skolem theorem). Thus his famous
motto: To be is to be the value of a variable. The US philosopher Paul
Churchland expanded Quine's holism by
interpreting Quine's network of meanings as a space of semantic states, whose
dimensions are all the observable properties. Each expression in the language
is equivalent to defining the position of a concept within this space according
to the properties that the concept exhibits in that expression. The semantic value of a word derives from
its place in the network of the language as a whole. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Meaning: Journey to the Center of the Mind" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|