These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
Tulving summarized the
relationship between remembered and rememberer in the "encoding
specificity principle": remembering depends on the affinity between
encoding and decoding. Memories are encoded in a way that depends on the
circumstances when the event originally happened. The likelihood of recalling a
memory (of decoding it) depends on recreating those circumstances, on
reinstating the same psychological state. In other words, the way we feel about
an event plays an important role in the way that event can later be recalled.
For example, the feeling that I feel when I read a sentence is going to be
important for later recalling that sentence. That feeling has become part of
the episode, as it is encoded in my memory. Tulving's episodic memory
packages different aspects of an event to give it the
"autobiographical" feeling that makes it more than just a retrieval
of information, it makes it a memory of something that happened in our life. In
other words, an essential part of an episodic memory is the
"rememberer". The rememberer does more than retrieve information
about a past event: the rememberer experiences that event again. In fact, the
episodic memory is more about the feeling of being there than about the event
in itself: the feeling of the event is generally recalled in more accurate
terms than the details of the event. In fact, it is easier to remember something that happened a long time
ago but had a strong emotional impact on us than something that happened just
minutes ago. I do not remember what I had for lunch two days ago, but I do
remember episodes of my childhood that happened several decades ago (if I
focus, I can even feel what I felt then). Ultimately, episodic memory is about
the rememberer, not the remembered. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Memory" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|