These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
One of the things that we do
with language is to tell stories. In fact, one wonders if we do anything else.
Even the simplest of communication or discussion involves many mini-stories. The US psychologist Jerome
Bruner pointed out that there are,
basically, two kinds of thinking: the paradigmatic and the narrative. And they
are like two different substances in that they represent the world in two
different ways and they obey two different sets of laws. They are irreducible to one
another. One is reasoning, and the other one is narrating. One produces logical
arguments whose goal is truth. The other one produces stories whose goal is
plausibility. Abstract form is the key element of the former, whereas human
psychology is the key element of the latter. Bruner points out that human
civilization has developed sophisticated analyses of how to think in the
paradigmatic way (for example, mathematical Logic), but has little to say about
how to think in the narrative way (how to write good stories). Bruner believes that narrative
thinking incorporates two dimensions: the "landscape of action" (the
plot) and the "landscape of consciousness" (the motivations). The
former outlines the actions and the actors, the latter outlines their mental
states (goals, beliefs, emotions). Following Lev Vygotsky, Bruner thinks that reality belongs to two spheres, the natural and the
social, the former being more aptly described by paradigmatic thought (the
sciences) and the latter being more aptly described by narrative thought. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Pragmatics" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|