These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
A Critique of Neuroscience Neuroscience of the 20th
century was based on classical Physics. No surprise, then, that it derived a
view of the brain as a set of mechanical laws: that is the "only"
view that classical Physics can derive. No surprise that it could not explain
how consciousness arises, since there is no consciousness in classical Physics:
it was erased from the study of matter by Descartes' dualism (that mind and matter are separate), on which foundations
Newton erected classical Physics (the
science of matter, which does not deal with mind). By definition, Descartes'
dualism predicts that mind cannot be explained from matter, and Newton's
Physics is basically an instantiation of Descartes dualism. Which means that
Descartes dualism predicts that Newton's Physics cannot explain the conscious
mind. Neuroscientists of the 20th century who were looking for
consciousness missed that simple syllogism: they were looking for consciousness
using a tool that was labeled "not suitable for finding
consciousness". Neuroscience of the 20th
century rested on the Newtonian principle that a physical system is made of
independent parts which interact only with their immediate neighbors and whose
behavior over time is deterministic. Within this paradigm, a mind is the
product of a brain, which is one particular system of the many that populate
the universe. This is a useful paradigm for the study of many material
phenomena, but it is not what the Physics of the 20th century
prescribed. It is what Physics prescribed a century earlier, before it was
showed to be wrong. Neurological descriptions of
the brain that are based on Newton's Physics are based on a Physic that is known to have limitations at a
small and large scale. Twentieth century neurologists assumed that
the brain and its parts behave like classical objects, and that quantum effects
are negligible, even while the "objects" that they were studying got
smaller and smaller. What 20th century neurologists were doing when
they studied the microstructure of the brain from a Newtonian perspective was
equivalent to organizing a trip to the Moon on the basis of Aristotle's Physics, neglecting
Newton's theory of gravitation. Back to the beginning of the chapter "A Physics Of Consciousness" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|