These are excerpts and elaborations from my book "The Nature of Consciousness"
|
Hierarchies from Complexity The US zoologist Stanley
Salthe developed a multi-dimensional
theory: an ontology of the world, a hierarchical representation of the world
and a model of the evolution of the world.
Salthe inherits a definition of
complexity from the US biologist Howard Pattee: complexity is the result of interactions between physical and
symbolic systems. A physical system is dependent on the rates at which
processes occur, whereas a symbolic system is not. Symbolic systems frequently
serve as constraints applied to the operation of physical systems, and
frequently appear as products of the activity of physical systems (e.g., the
genome in a cell). A physical system
can be said to be “complex” when a part of it functions as a symbolic system
(as a representation, and therefore as an observer) for another part of
it. John Von Neumann was possibly the first
scientist to realize that it takes a certain degree of complexity for physical
molecules to enter the cycle of Darwinian open-ended evolution. This degree of
complexity is determined by description-based reproduction. Once there is
description-based reproduction, then there is Darwinian evolution. Von Neumann thus made a distinction between
"quiescent" symbolic description and "active" physical
dynamics, between descriptions and constructions, between, ultimately, semiotic
processes (information and codes) and physical systems (energy-matter and
forces). Pattee believed that this distinction occurs at all levels of
organization in the universe, not only at the level of genes and proteins. At
the highest level this distinction translates into the distinction between the
physical systems that populate the universe and the semiotic process of
measurement (that codes a dynamical state into quiescent symbols). The
genotype-phenotype distinction an instance of the origin of symbol systems from
physical systems. What causes normal physical molecules to start functioning as
descriptions? Pattee called this phenomenon, that separates description from
construction and that occurs at all levels of organization, the "epistemic
cut". Its origin lies not in the chemical properties of cells but in the
complex relationships established within a complex hierarchical system. Salthe was also influenced by the
metaphysics of the US philosopher Justus Buchler. His “natural complex” is pretty much anything that one can think of,
whether organism, concept or conscious event. On the other hand, an “order” is
a multiplicity that becomes a unity by virtue of its internal organization (by
virtue of the pattern of relatedness among its components). Buchler’s
“principle of ordinality” states that every natural complex is an order.
Basically, the principle of ordinality asserts that every complex must be
constituted by other complexes, and that every complex must be one of the
constituents of some other complex. Every complex is relative to some other
complex, is conditioned by and conditions other complexes. The Argentine philosopher
Mario Bunge saw the universe not as a heap of things but as a system composed
of interconnected systems of various kinds (physical, biological, economic,
political, cultural). Bunge's systemism offered an alternative to both individualism
and holism, allowing for both individual identity and collective organization.
Bunge argued that a system is defined by “composition” (what it is made of),
“environment” (what surrounds it), “structure” (what holds it together) and
“mechanism” (how it operates). In Salthe’s theory, the world is viewed as a determinate machine of unlimited
complexity. Within complexity, discontinuities arise. The basic structure of
this world must allow for complexity that is spontaneously stable and that can
be broken down to things divided by boundaries. The most natural way for the
world to satisfy this requirement is to employ a hierarchical structure, which
is also implied by Buchler's principle of ordinality: Nature is a hierarchy of
entities existing at different levels of organization. Hierarchical structure turns out to be a
consequence of complexity. Entities of the hierarchy
are defined by four attributes: boundaries, scale, integration, continuity. An
entity has size, is limited by boundaries, and consists of an integrated
system, which varies continuously in time. Entities at different levels
interact through mutual constraints, each constraint carrying information for
the level it operates upon. A process
can be described by a triad of contiguous levels: the one it occurs at, its
context (what Bunge called “environment”) and its causes (Bunge's “structure”).
In general, a lower level provides initiating conditions for a process and an
upper level provides boundary conditions.
Representing a dynamic system hierarchically requires a triadic
structure. Aggregation occurs upon
differentiation. Differentiation
interpolates levels between the original two and the new entities aggregate in
such a way that affects the structure of the upper levels: every time a new
level emerges, the entire hierarchy must reorganize itself. These abstract principles
also apply to biological evolution.
Over time, Nature generates entities of gradually more limited scope and
more precise form and behavior. This process populates the hierarchy of
intermediate levels of organization as the hierarchy spontaneously reorganizes
itself. The same model applies to all
open systems, whether organisms or ecosystems or planets. Basically, Salthe aims at reformulating Biology
on development rather than on evolution. His approach is non-Darwinian to the
extent that development, and not evolution, is assumed to be the fundamental
process in self-organization. Evolution, in his opinion, is merely the result
of a margin of error. Salthe’s grand theory of nature turns out to be essentially a theory of
change, which turns out to be essentially a theory of emergence. Back to the beginning of the chapter "Self-organization and the Science of Emergence" | Back to the index of all chapters |
|
|
|
|