Boustead Spore's FF Wong started out with a private fund back in 2021, before attempting to transit to a publicly listed REIT in 2025 and the reason for starting out with a private fund was probably because it didn't have enough scale back then.
In general, asset mgrs earn more fees from managing publicly listed funds than private ones. Since SCPREF does not have the issue of scale, I can only imagine that the Jardines prefer to exclusively deal with institutional capital as their LPs. Another real possibility is that the publicly listed vehicle will only appear down the road, with the public vehicle acting as the "liquidity exit" for the private vehicle.
Finally, some private funds have a very long lifespan and depending on its LPs and the way the setup and mgt works, it may be just as "perpetual" as REITs.
Hongkong Land should do a listed Reit with its Singapore commercial properties instead of a private fund
A Reit is a permanent platform that can grow
SCPREF, which is expected to be the largest Singapore private real estate fund with over S$8 billion of assets under management at inception, will focus on prime commercial assets in the city-state.
Might Hongkong Land be wrong to choose a private fund instead of a Singapore-listed real estate investment trust (Reit) to hold prime Singapore commercial property? Arguably so, in my opinion.
Crucially, while a private fund may have a lifespan of say seven years, a Reit is a permanent platform. And in the Singapore context, a Reit with size, high-quality assets, a strong sponsor and an astute external manager can grow substantially.
Today, the Republic’s largest Reit, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust : C38U +0.43% (CICT), has a portfolio of properties worth around S$27 billion.
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion...ivate-fund
In general, asset mgrs earn more fees from managing publicly listed funds than private ones. Since SCPREF does not have the issue of scale, I can only imagine that the Jardines prefer to exclusively deal with institutional capital as their LPs. Another real possibility is that the publicly listed vehicle will only appear down the road, with the public vehicle acting as the "liquidity exit" for the private vehicle.
Finally, some private funds have a very long lifespan and depending on its LPs and the way the setup and mgt works, it may be just as "perpetual" as REITs.
Hongkong Land should do a listed Reit with its Singapore commercial properties instead of a private fund
A Reit is a permanent platform that can grow
SCPREF, which is expected to be the largest Singapore private real estate fund with over S$8 billion of assets under management at inception, will focus on prime commercial assets in the city-state.
Might Hongkong Land be wrong to choose a private fund instead of a Singapore-listed real estate investment trust (Reit) to hold prime Singapore commercial property? Arguably so, in my opinion.
Crucially, while a private fund may have a lifespan of say seven years, a Reit is a permanent platform. And in the Singapore context, a Reit with size, high-quality assets, a strong sponsor and an astute external manager can grow substantially.
Today, the Republic’s largest Reit, CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust : C38U +0.43% (CICT), has a portfolio of properties worth around S$27 billion.
https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/opinion...ivate-fund
I am not a certified financial advisor and so nothing of what I say should be construed as financial advice. Please consult a certified financial advisor for advice instead.
Homepage

Since SCPREF is targeting to almost double its FUM from this initial size in the next few years, the 3rd party committed capital of 1.8bil should probably reduce HKL's 50% GP stake in the coming years.