Iām not sure Iām as crazy about Hi-Def as Iām required by law to be as of this week.
First, a caveat: Although we have the kick-ass TV and the high-def satellite package, we havenāt sprung for the Blu-Ray player, so unless itās a program being broadcast in high-definition, weāre just getting a Much Crisper image, not a true Hi-Def one.
Also, we donāt watch sports, which I understand is a transcendental experience in HD, so as selling points go, thatās off the table.
What we do watch is Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert (still broadcast in basic-cable low-definition), news and politics shows and scripted series when the TV gods smile upon us. Well, we went hi-def just as the TV season ended, so we missed out for now on whatever coolness that may have had to offer.
A quick digression: At least we wonāt have to watch shows anymore, and Iām looking at you, āSesame Streetā and āLost,ā where the networks broadcast the widescreen version in a pan-and-scan format for viewers without the big bucks to go high definition. A tip of the hat to Fox who started out last season doing that, and switched back to the more viewer-friendly, old-school letterbox effect about halfway into the year. Shit was so obviously cut off of the sides of the image, weād watch the end of āSesame Streetā where theyād say, āTodayās show is brought to you by the number 3 and the letters Y and Zā and all we could see was the Y in the middle and little bits of the edges of the 3 and Z. Or the opening titles cut off of āMediumā or the cropped-off location tags on āFringe.ā It was just downright disrespectful, I thought.
So anyway, I may well have no idea what Iām talking abut here. Perhaps some day this post will read like a turn-of-the-last-century rant about those dad-blamed horseless carriages filling up the streets, but I gotta say it.
Watching stuff on our new high-def tech tends to make it a lot less special. And itās not just that I can see every pore on an actorās face or make out the texture of the rags extras are wearing in period-pieces. Itās not the stuff thatās added that bugs me, itās whatās missing.
Thereās a distance, a reserve thatās missing. That whatever-that-is that says, āWelcome! Youāre at the movies!ā is for the most part gone in high definition. Instead of watching pharaohās city being built by a cast of thousands in āThe Ten Commandments,ā youāre watching a bunch of funnily-dressed, overheated men and woman trudge past the camera in front of a background that is obviously fake. And remember, Iām not talking about true everything-is-high-def hi-def. Iām just talking about the latest standard-DVD release of this fine film.
The interior scenes are even worse. Itās like looking at a filmed-on-video production of the local community theaterās extravagant production. The grandeur is gone. Yul Brynner is no longer the pharaoh Rameses The Great re-shaping the world in his own image, heās Yul Brynner, actor in make-up, saying silly things on an over-lit set.
And itās not just the classics. I rented a few videos this week and checked them out during The Missusā latest job-related trip away from home. Except for hyper-stylized stuff like āThe Transporter 3ā (shitty film), the same You-Are-There-And-Itās-Boring feeling persisted.
Even the flick I ended up liking, āCrossing Overā (an āissuesā film with Harrison Ford leading a strong ensemble cast, directed by the frigging mad genius who directed āRunning Scared;ā it seems like thereās no genre this guy canāt do) kept shaking me out of the film, scene after scene, with how stage-y everything looked.
I did a test ā I ran a little bit of the same film on my office TV/DVD player combo, and it looked just fine. A little softer-focus maybe but a lot more like a movie experience and less like a well-shot stage play. I began to wonder if maybe part of what makes the moviegoing experience cathartic and transporting is the slight detachment from reality that film provides. Thatās why they made the movie screens themselves literally larger-than-life. It was supposed to be something you used to escape from the real world for a couple of hours, not be forced to stare down the barrel of at close range.
Then I watched a new-release period-piece, āDefianceā with Daniel Craig as a Jewish resistance leader in WWII. This one fared even worse. The period costumes looked blatantly stage-bound, and the actors looked like actors in the woods, hitting marks and delivering lines.
I also watched an early-season episode of āLost,ā broadcast in HD, and Sayidās Baghdad-flashback greenscreen backgrounds and wide-shot matte paintings stood out like sore thumbs, where Iād never noticed the artifice before.
On the other hand, I watched the opening foot-chase scene from āCasino Royaleā and the fact that I was watching stunt people actually run up the sides of buildings and across construction cranes hundreds of feet in the air gave the scene considerably extra dramatic oomph. But again, not in the Great Movie way it impressed in the theater, but in a āI wonder if anybody died filming thisā kind of way.
I even watched a little bit of āDark Knightā tonight on HBO-HD, and the truck chase through downtown Gotham seemed as remarkably staged as it was crisp-looking. The one thing that HD didnāt diminish was Heath Ledgerās performance. Christian Bale looked like a guy in an uncomfortable PVC suit, but Ledger still mesmerized.
I guess what Iām saying is, so far my experience with high-def TV is like going to a Penn and Teller magic show, where they explain how every trick works before they perform it for you. A lot of the gee-whiz specialness is gone.
Oh, itās great for cartoons, though. Awesome! āBatman, The Brave and the Boldā and āIron Man: Armored Adventuresā (both running on some Nik cartoon channel) look fantastic on the new equipment. The Boy has no idea how lucky he is, in this one respect, to have been born when he was.
In the long run, I think what we currently refer to as high-def will turn out to have been a middle step on the way to some truly immersive audio/visual experience, like 3D without the glasses. Like they have to master this technology before Jim Cameron can adapt it into the first truly holographic home viewing experience.
As a middle step, I suppose Iāll get used to this damned high-definition craze. But Iām going to keep the old analog set in my office as long as there remains old-fashioned tech to run it. Sometimes, Iām sure, Iāll still just want a movie to feel like a movie, even if I have to squint a little to keep the illusion alive.