SATELLITE RADIO, PREDICTING TENDS, KELLY & CLIVE AND THE HOMOGINIZATION OF MEDIA
SATELLITE RADIO, PREDICTING TRENDS, KELLY & CLIVE AND THE HOMOGINIZATION OF MEDIA
Hugh Panero is leaving. Gonna miss him. As soon as he leaves Iâll share a few classic Hugh storiesâŚhas to wait a few days since he can still fire me. Iâm the only original employee left (other than Chariman Parsons who has been here since about 1955)
Satellite Radio is where the action is. In preparing for XMX (our new channel that aggregates our special programs), I looked through the range of contentâand itâs really mind boggling. For example:
Over 50 Bob Dylan Shows. Itâs REALLY Bob. Pure---
Over 50 Tom Petty Shows. Itâs REALLY Tom. Pure---
Dozens of Wynton Marsalis Shows. A sound tap in the mind of Marsalis.
Hours and Hours of Quincy Jones Specials. One-on-one stories fro the master.
Over 100 Bill Anderson Showsâinterviewing the Gods of Country Music
70 Artists Confidentials. Including Mc Cartney, Sting, Willie Nelson, Robert Plant. Incredible intimate performances and audience interaction.
Over a Dozen Then Again including Jethro Tull redoing Aqulalung, Allman Brothers redoing Eat a Peach
Dozens of Live Broadcasts of Concert Events from Live Eight to Bonaroo to Willieâs Picnic to Telluride to Merlefest..
5000 Concerts recorded at XMâŚJohn Legend to John Mayer,
OffstageâOne off DJ shows from Bob Seger, Elton John, Yoko Ono, Josh Groban, Joe Walsh, Jon Anderson, Gregg Allman
..And thatâs just the tip of it. Itâs really amazing. Whatâs especially amazing is that FM is still in the land of canned sounding syndication. Satellite radio is on the edge creating really powerful NEW content. Thatâs why this XMX thing is going to be goodâNO ONE knows this stuff exists..Itâs been buried. One of the problems with SO many channels.
While Satellite is engaging artists, the big news at Viacom is lawsuits between Redstone and his kids. Classy operation.
Kelly Clarkson apologizes to Clive Davis. Huh? Actually it's typical in the "musical/cultural" lull period we are in. Lull periods are characterized by things like Business controlling artists (ulnike the opposite "Intense periods" where Artists drive things)...In lulls there's fashion over art; Boyfriend/girlfriend lyrics are in command; no major musical advances that make the prior generation of music nostalgic more than relevant; the "look" of artists is flashy but not scary...and the list goes on. Let's just say that we are SO in the American Idol era... It's actually a fascinating study of music and cultural trends over the past 50 years that I did...well, I think it's fascinating...I also know it's valid because I developed it in 1978 and it has been extremely accurate for the last 29 years in assessing and to a certain degree predicting trends. I guess I'll dive into it next blog. The point right now is that an artist apologizing to a label head is typical during a lull period--During an intense period (like 55, 64, 70, 80 or 93, A label head would bow to an artist that sells as many CD's as she does)...Can you imagine Elvis, The Beatles, Hendrix, the Police or Nirvana APOLOGIZING to a record company???!!!! Yeah--those are "big names" but any important artist from "intense" periods wouldn't even bother. More on this lull/intense thing later...but suffice to say, we are in a lull...
If you think radio is clichĂŠd, TV is worse! Had some dialogue with Randy Michaels who runs Local TV LLC, formerly the New York Times Stations. A nice group with stations in Memphis, Norfolk and a dozen or so other markets. Randy of course will do some damage in these markets---He has NO TV âbaggageâ and is a brilliant and hyper-competitive guy. He was sharing the clichĂŠsâŚitâs unreal. The consultants CONTROL local TV News. Then I went and looked at the websites of local TV Stations---they ALL:
*Share the same three or four âgood testingâ slogans.
*Have the same mix of homogenized teflon news people (They all LOOK the same)! Fake. Funny that historically and even today, the most respected (rather than simply tolerated) news people donât necessarily âlookâ great. More about character than happy and shiny.
AndâŚwell, go to http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/07/31/utility/main517034.shtml And click away---The homogenization is unreal.
I suppose the argument would be that it makes sense to duplicate a successful formula. Yeahâbut this ainât duplicationâŚthis is mindless sheep herding. Just as bad as terrestrial radio. No bitterness hereânothing to be bitter about---Itâs more about the sheer amazement at the ongoing homogenization of media. America used to be the place where innovation drove the train. Now, with the exception of the Apples, HBOâs and a handful of others, thereâs no engine..Just a lot of freight cars carrying a vacant message. That vacant message feeds junk culture and junk culture feeds mass stupidityâŚwhich...Okâyou see the domino effect. Thatâs scary..And thatâs why I really believe in the NEED to innovate! âor at least TRY to innovate. Other than those completely focused on the pure business side and not having the sense to balance it with the creativeâthe real culprit is the research and the research companies driving content. I gotta credit content research companies for having outstanding sales skills to hypnotize an entire industry, tempered with disdain for the unwavering advocates of this stuff. RESEARCH is of course a wonderful thing (and there ARE âgoodâ research companies delivering important data) ---but itâs WAY out of control in terms of guiding upfront content decisions and more often than not being used where it shouldnât be at the expense of being used where it should beâŚand itâs always positioned as a âroad mapâ but the map is blindly followed directly into the pit of mediocrity. From a radio perspective it was good that in 1966 it helped us realize that people like to hear their favorite songsâŚor in 1976 itâs good to say your call letters a lot. OKâI think weâre beyond that. I personally get heat for âruining radioâ back in the 70âs by researching it. Well, at the time, thatâs what it needed. NOWâthatâs NOT what it needs. I guess the same thing in TV news---It NEEDED research in 1980âŚbut now, the research morphine is whatâs killing itâŚthrough the slow death of homogenization to the point of irrelivency. The NEW innovations are based on ideas...Often from people who have either ZERO baggage and donât know any better OR from vets who have been through the research grind and think beyond it. Make no mistake: research is âfinding stuff outâ and is invaluableâŚbut the way itâs positioned as the magic serum...and bought into without questioning or dialogue is what is aiding homogenization, junk culture and irrelivent dated media. In a way, Im thankful. Without the over researched radio stations, basing everything on obviopuslty flawed data, thereâd be no need for XM because terrestrial would sund just fine. Iâm betting on Randy Michaels to succeed in TV because he gets this. In fact, I think the over researched sheep mentality is goodâfor anyone with new ideas. While everyone is asleep on the research drug---innovators can have at itâŚ.and succeed.
Something over-research forces is communicating with people in marketing speak instead of real words. Simple âmemorableâ slogans that in MOST cases have NO tractionâin fact they are plain silly to anyone over 8. Do you think ANYONE believes words like âBiggestâŚbestâŚmostâŚââŚbut you still see âBiggest, best, mostâ and other nonsense. Focus group slogans workedâŚback in the 70âsâŚbut âenough alreadyâ just TALK and explain. Normal. Super Action News You Can Trust Thatâs on your SideâŚ.yeah right!
XM did several early content oriented research projects...Thank God we didnât follow that information---It proved 90% dead wrong from âComedy wont workâ to a complete misfire on predicting who our early adopters would be. One disclaimer here---We have a research person here named Rob JohnstonâHeâs great. He knows WHERE to use dataâŚdelivers it and itâs a good thing.
Newspapers continue to slide. A BIG Part of the problem is that the PAPER is still the center of their universe. They are often incredible news gathering operations, but are betting the farm on print instead of print being a component in the distribution of their content. It also hurts when the print part hasnât been truly reinvented beyond a few band-aids since 1888. Personally, I think Newspapers are among THE most attractive media todayâbecause of the opportunities to re-invent these insituitions.
Here are two article links worth checking out. The first one is pretty funny from THE ONION, who is âin onâ the junk culture joke:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/no_one_admits_to_singing_writing
This one is from the Wall Street Journal. About our Countryâs #1 problemâŚdumbing down.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110010352
