Showing posts with label series. Show all posts
Showing posts with label series. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Analysis of a Series: An Investigation before the AP Calculus BC Exam

\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{6}

The remarkable identity above could be the subject of many math blog posts but we will look at a variation, one that is accessible to precalculus and calculus students. With the AP Calculus BC Exam looming, the following investigation can be used to introduce or to review the topic.

I'm not sure if I have ever made it really clear on this blog that I routinely used these kinds of investigations in the classroom. For those who wonder how I could possibly have completed the required coursework for the AP Calculus BC syllabus or who might question my sanity, a couple of points here:

(1) Of course I didn't do this every day. I might have done an extensive investigation once per unit.
(2) Imagine my surprise when I first saw the Finney, Demana, Waits and Kennedy text, a book that has these kinds of explorations in every chapter! I thought they had found my old lesson plans.
(3) Most of the extensive investigations were assigned for work outside the classroom. In fact, for a while, the first investigation of the year was posted on my web site and emailed to students at the end of August before they arrived in school (I met them in June before they left for the summer or I got their phone numbers from guidance and called each of them to tell them to look for the assignment online, and to download and print it.)
(4) Even if I didn't prepare an exploration every day, most every lesson plan which introduced a new topic included a series of leading questions like these. My intent was always to have them think more deeply about a topic, i.e., to understand

  • the historical origins of the topic
  • how it was connected to their prior learning
  • its usefulness and application
  • why a method or theorem works (derivation, justification)
Developing these lessons initially was labor-intensive but a work of love. Perhaps no more laborious than what another of my colleagues did for his students: developing a PowerPoint presentation for every lesson for the entire year. As time-consuming as all of that sounds, once you've done a few of these, they start to flow naturally and the following year you only have to revise!

A Series Investigation

Consider the following finite series:

\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{15}+...+\frac{1}{n^2-1}+...+\frac{1}{99}

(a) Write the series using summation notation.

(b) Verify the following identity for n > 1:

\frac{1}{n^2-1} = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{n-1}-\frac{1}{n+1})

(c) Use the identity in (b) to show that the value of the series above is
\frac{1}{2}((\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{11})+(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{10}))=\frac{36}{55}

Hint: What was Galileo's most famous invention?

(d) Using a method similar to (c) verify the following for n, even:

\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{15}+...+\frac{1}{n^2-1}=\frac{1}{2}((1-\frac{1}{n+1})+(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{n}))

Note: If n = 2, the right side would be accurate however the left side would consist of only one term. I could have used summation notation for the left side but I didn't want to give away the answer to part (a).

(e) If n is odd, show that the series on the left of part (d) can be written:

\frac{1}{2}((1-\frac{1}{n})+(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{n+1}))

(f) Show that the expression on the right side of the equation in (d) and the expression in (e) are algebraically equivalent.

(g) Use the expressions from (d) and (e) to show that the sum of the following infinite series is 3/4:

\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{15}+...+\frac{1}{n^2-1}+...


(h) There are many ways (p-series, integral test, etc.) to prove that the series \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{1}{n^2}

converges. However, for this exploration, we will use the convergence of the series in (g) to do this:
Demonstrate that this series converges using both the Comparison Test and the Limit Comparison Test by using the series in (g).

Notes:
  • More commonly, the convergence of the series in (g) is demonstrated by comparing it to the p-series. We're doing the reverse here.
  • Another important aspect for precalculus and calculus students is to have them compare the partial sums to the sum of the infinite series. Thus, it's worth taking the time to have them see how close the sum is to 0.75 when adding the first 100 terms, the first 1000 terms etc. Also, indicate that the difference can be thought of as the "error" in the approximation. All of this is needed for further study and it deepens their understanding of infinite series.
  • As indicated above, this investigation may be too time-consuming for a regular period of 40-45 minutes. I would recommend doing parts (a)-(c) (or (d)) in class and assigning the rest for homework to be collected after 2-3 days.
  • Teachers of precalculus can use parts of this investigation when developing the concepts of series. Much of the groundwork for infinite series can be laid before students get to calculus!

Friday, April 13, 2007

Harmony in Infinite Series

To continue our discussion of infinite series, I usually show students the famous proof that the harmonic series 1+1/2+1/3+1/4+... diverges. This series is paradoxical to students because, in their minds,there is convergence, since the terms themselves approach zero. With some exploration they can begin to appreciate that convergence of the sum of the terms depends on how fast the terms approach zero! Most of the content of the student investigation below can be found in MathWorld or Wikipedia but my intent, as it almost always is on this blog, is to produce a classroom experience for students and an activity for teachers to use, not just an expository piece of writing.

Consider the following "S-series":
1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/16 +...
(a) Continuing this pattern (of repeating groups of reciprocals of powers of 2), what would the 16th term be?
(b) If Sn represents the sum of the first n terms of this series (where n is a positive integer), what is the value of S16? No calculator!
(c) Develop a formula for S2n and verify your formula for S1024. Here, n = 0,1,2,...
(d) What conclusion can you draw about the convergence of the "S-series?" Explain.
(e) Consider the harmonic series (which we will call the "H-series"):
1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + ... + 1/n + ...
Let Hn represent the sum of the first n terms of this series.
Show that H16 > 3, H1024 > 6 and H65536 > 9 by comparing the "H-series" to the "S-series" term by term.

(f) Based on the above, what conclusion can you draw regarding the limit of the sequence of partial sums, Hn? What does this imply about the convergence or divergence of the harmonic series? How would you describe the rate at which this series converges or diverges?
(g) Research the harmonic series online. Be prepared to answer the following question:
What does the harmonic series have to do with overtones in music?
(h) Consider generalizations of the harmonic series, such as replacing 1/n by 1/(kn+j). Make two such generalizations and examine convergence in each case.

The possibilities are endless. If two roads diverged in the woods, which one would you take?

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Bringing a 'Series' of Wonders to the Calculus Classroom

The following may drive away most casual readers but it does describe what I try to do every day. One of my goals in starting this blog was to enable a dialogue for effective instructional strategies. My focus has generally been on middle and secondary school curriculum up to Algebra 2, bordering on Precalculus. Today I am sharing a different experience. I hope some of you will appreciate it beyond its technical aspects. Similar developments can be found in some textbooks and experienced teachers already do most of this but as this scenario is fresh in my mind, I thought I'd re-play it for you...

Although most Advanced Placement Calculus (BC) teachers are completing or have already completed the unit on infinite series, I would like to offer a view that I hope brings a sense of 'shock and awe' to the student of the 21st century who rarely has the time to stop and appreciate the beauty of our subject. To those who have been teaching this for a while, you may not quite feel this. However, I still get goosebumps when I observe student reactions as this unfolds in front of their eyes...

Assume that students already have a basic understanding of infinite series, the infinite geometric series in particular.

Consider the following three infinite geometric series:

1+1/2+1/4+1/8+... = 1/(1-1/2) = 2
1+1/3+1/9+1/27+... = 1/(1-1/3) = 3/2
1-1/4+1/16-1/64+... = 1/(1-(-1/4)) = 4/5

Just a collection of simple geometric series, boys and girls?
Genius is looking at an ordinary collection of objects and seeing something different. Some mathematician or mathematicians (research this and report back with their bios!) may have considered a reverse view of these series. Instead of the goal being a formula for the sum of the series, perhaps the goal was to represent a function in a different way. Step back into history...

Consider the general formula for the sum of all these series: 1/(1-r) provided r is between -1 and 1. Replace r by x, the variable we usually use for functions, and we can write:
1 + x + x2 + x3 +... = 1/(1-x) provided x is between -1 and 1.

The 'polynomial' of infinite degree on the left is known as a power series in x. As long as x is between -1 and 1 (the interval of convergence), this 'equation' makes sense and allows us to use algebraic and calculus operations to represent other related functions. Think of how one might have felt when 'discovering' this and I'm just speculating here. The rational function 1/(1-x) is being represented by some kind of polynomial that never ends. Even though x= 1 is not in the interval of convergence, substituting leads to 1/0 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 +.... Hmm....
Let's try substitution on this representation.
Replace x by -x2:
(You can show the domain is unchanged)
1/(1 - (-x2)) = 1 + (-x2) + (-x2)2 + (-x2)3 + ... OR
1/(1 + x2) = 1 - x2 + x4 - x6 +...

Ok, let's integrate both sides (assuming it's legal to do so):
tan-1(x) = x - (1/3)x3 + (1/5)x5 - (1/7)x7 + ... + C
Replacing x by 0, we see that C = 0.
Now, you'll have to accept this for the moment (to be proved later), equality holds for x = 1, even though 1 was not in the original interval of convergence! It is not unusual when integrating a power series to see the domain include one or both endpoints even though the original function excluded them!

Thus, tan-1(1) = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + ...
Anyone recognize the left-hand side?
The bell rings...