Latest comment: 14 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, BlackBoy1213, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living persons must contain at least one source.
Latest comment: 13 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2001 in Iceland, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
Latest comment: 12 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:
This draft does not include any sources or inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. You should also use inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
You must place an inline citation directly after:
quotations;
any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
Latest comment: 12 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Anerdw, left the following feedback:
group notability: sources must discuss the items in the list as a whole, rather than just verifying that the individual items exist;
encyclopedic purpose: avoid cross-categorisations, such as "List of X of Y", unless sources explicitly discuss this intersection as a distinct subject;
Selection criteria: an unambiguous, objective definition of what is included to distinguish the list from a directory.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If no such sources exist, the list is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:1994 in Albania to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Latest comment: 12 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Anerdw, left the following feedback:
group notability: sources must discuss the items in the list as a whole, rather than just verifying that the individual items exist;
encyclopedic purpose: avoid cross-categorisations, such as "List of X of Y", unless sources explicitly discuss this intersection as a distinct subject;
Selection criteria: an unambiguous, objective definition of what is included to distinguish the list from a directory.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If no such sources exist, the list is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:1994 in Albania to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:
Procedural decline - resubmitted without addressing previous decline.
Next steps
Edit Draft:1994 in Albania to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:
group notability: sources must discuss the items in the list as a whole, rather than just verifying that the individual items exist;
encyclopedic purpose: avoid cross-categorisations, such as "List of X of Y", unless sources explicitly discuss this intersection as a distinct subject;
Selection criteria: an unambiguous, objective definition of what is included to distinguish the list from a directory.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If no such sources exist, the list is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:1995 in Albania to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:
group notability: sources must discuss the items in the list as a whole, rather than just verifying that the individual items exist;
encyclopedic purpose: avoid cross-categorisations, such as "List of X of Y", unless sources explicitly discuss this intersection as a distinct subject;
Selection criteria: an unambiguous, objective definition of what is included to distinguish the list from a directory.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If no such sources exist, the list is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:1996 in Albania to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A number of your edits are tagged with the "paste check" tag, indicating that you copypasted the full text of the edit from elsewhere. It seems to me you've been using AI to generate these edits. If that's the case, please be aware this is not allowed on Wikipedia. Athanelar (talk) 00:12, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours because your recent edits appear to be disruptive. Please note that this is not necessarily an assessment of faith or character, and we welcome good faith edits that are also constructive and in line with our policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
Latest comment: 10 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, S0091, left the following feedback:
Latest comment: 8 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hello BlackBoy1213, I think it is admirable you tried to create new articles for Wikipedia but as other editors have said, it is a really hard thing to do. I suggest reading WP:Guidance for younger editors along with WP:Mentorship. I hope you return and if you do, start again with doing little things because there is plenty to do here to help out and along the way you learn a lot. Also, of course, don't use AI because it causes a lot of problems. I wish you the best - S0091 (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I remember when I started editing Wikipedia twenty years ago (when I was only fifty years old!) how I really wanted to make my mark by creating new articles.
Now I know that creating new articles is not the only way to contribute to Wikipedia, and it's often not the best way - especially now, that so many millions of articles have already been written. (Some of them are very poor, and should be improved or deleted, but not many editors want to spend much time clearing up other people's messes!) It genuinely is harder than it used to be to find a suitable subject for an article.
Writing an article starts with finding sources that are about the subject of the article specifically, where nobody connected with the subject has had any input: they need to meet all the conditions in WP:42. Unless you can find several such sources, there's no point in trying to write an article, because an article should not be based on what you know, but on what the sources say. (That's been the main problem with the drafts you've created so far: you've thought of a subject and started writing about it, instead of looking for the sources).
Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft is not suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a digital encyclopedia, not a general publishing platform. We do not accept:
essays or original research: personal views, advocacy, unpublished theories, or pre-prints;
resumes or personal profiles: CVs, social networking pages, or memorials;
directories or manuals: travel guides, catalogs, or how-to instructions;
creative writing: fanfiction, worldbuilding, myths, or things you have made up.
The above list is not exhaustive. Please read What Wikipedia is not to understand what content is excluded.
Next steps
Edit Draft:2000 in Europe to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2001 in Iceland, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Prevlaka,_Zagreb_County, as LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2026 (UTC)