User talk:Ggevaart1

Conflict of interest: Norton Rose Fulbright

Hello, Ggevaart1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Norton Rose Fulbright, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Vegantics (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello-

Thank you for this message. I was editing on behalf of a client who is hired by Norton Rose Fulbright. Where can I disclose my COI now that the edits have been implemented onto the article? I will disclose this going forward. I currently have an edit on another article where I did disclose my COI and another editor is handling the proposed edits. Ggevaart1 (talk) 16:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

You should follow WP:DCOI to disclose it on the talk, page for Norton Rose Fulbright and make requests for edits there going forward. I'll review your past edits for neutrality as I see some have already been undone. Vegantics (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Ways to improve Anthony V. Lupo

Hello, Ggevaart1,

Thank you for creating Anthony V. Lupo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Page author has declared COI on Talk page

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cabrils}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cabrils (talk) 02:38, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@Cabrils: Hello! Thank you for taking the time to look over the page. Please let me know if there are any updates I should make. I was careful to include secondary sources for every point. Are there other things I could include to meet the notoriety threshold?

Thanks

Ggevaart1 (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Ggevaart1,

Thanks for the ping.

I just reviewed the page as part of the standard Wikipedia process (all new pages get reviewed), and it looked pretty good to me in my brief review, but I tagged it so that in due course reviewers/editors who check lists of pages with tags including the COI tag I placed on the page would be alerted and can assess with greater attention than what I can presently give (I'm conducting a review of new pages as part of the January–February 2026 NPP drive).

It may well be that those reviewers/editors would assess the page as fine and remove the tag, so it isn't something to be overly concerned about.

I note your willingness to meet the relevant criteria and appreciate your declaration of COI--you may like to add a note on the Talk page like you've posted here, which the community would appreciate.

Trust that makes sense. All the best with editing. Cabrils (talk) 23:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Fenwick & West

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fenwick & West, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anthony V. Lupo

The article Anthony V. Lupo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article about a fashion lawyer, created by declared paid editor. Some sources exist but coverage feels to me either WP:ROTM of WP:PROMO. Please see the discussion on the Talk page.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Cabrils (talk) 23:50, 21 April 2026 (UTC)