User talk:Shredlordsupreme
Add topic
  Welcome, Shredlordsupreme! My name is Alenoach and I just wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can type {{helpme}} on the bottom of your talk page and then ask your question, you can ask me on my talk page, or you can visit the Wikipedia help desk. Don't be afraid to ask! Getting Started
Here I have included a few pages to get you started:
|
Style detail
[edit]Please note that for quotation marks, Wikipedia uses logical quotation (see MOS:LQUOTE). Alenoach (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- Gotcha, thanks for the correction Shredlordsupreme (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Accelerationism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EBSCO. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
 |
The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path | |
| For your contributions to Accelerationism Czarking0 (talk) 14:10, 19 June 2025 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Edit on Canary Wharf
[edit]hello Shredlordsupreme, I just wanted to let you know that one of you edits on canay wharf have been reverted (you tagged the article as WP:NOTGUIDE) most of the article does not reflect this. instead see WP:NOTGUIDE as to what classifies as a section Theknoledgeableperson (|have a chat) 20:33, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
rADZ
[edit]Hi Shredlordsupreme.
Ill introduce myself with my COI: I’m a professional engineer with a passion for historical biography, mostly political and military leadership. I’ve spent most of my working life leading the production of analytical works in energy sustainability for sector, country and global governance entities. I’m drafting a compilation of experiences in the underground during WWII in the area of the Netherlands that my family comes from. These are necessarily transcriptions of oral histories, a personal project for my family. I am acquainted with several Wellington’s artists in the southern suburbs of Wellington NZ. Barry Thomas asked me to assist him with developing a coffee table publication of the Vacant Lot of Cabbages drawing on the photographic records left by Ans Westra and others. This project is in abeyance while I’ve picked up the development of a wiki page describing the Vacant Lot of Cabbages. My first effort at drafting to an encyclopaedic style, tone and manner.
Im keen to understand your logic for deleting the lists of rADz for the article. I included this so that there was a list of the rADz on record. The NZ rADz were all created on film and are archived at Nga Taonga, the NZ Government Sound and Film archive. They are however not available from Nga Taonga in digital form. Many can be viewed on You Tube, an unmoderated an unauthoritative site.
There is no intent, nor need, for any promotion. rADz were produced over 30 years ago. They have not been in production for the past 30 years. The many artists involved in these works have 'moved on' (certainly the art media employed has evolved beyond that available at the time) or they have retired and have negligible scope for commercial gain from recording what is now a matter of historical reference. I have tried to ensure that the artists that developed rADz are correctly credited. Some 1000 people were involved and are credited in each rADz, but i have listed the directors along with each rADz consistent with accepted attribution practice, consistent with what i believe is wikipedia's role as a dynamic record of history.
I have no commercial interest in the topic area. My employment is with a government-funded global energy and economic sustainability research entity based in a G8 country.
Any work I have done in wikipedia is derivative - based on credible published citations. I accept many are not currently in digital form. If you would like any citation that isn't digitally accessible, please ask, im happy to forward them to you
I feel its more constructive to discuss this with you, than for me to naively undo an edit that has been done in good faith.
Thank you for your efforts to refine this article.
Thank you Best regards Chuzosho Chuzosho (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
The Cracker Factory
[edit]The Cracker Factory is pretty essential to Land's beliefs, do you believe the paragraph should be drastically shortened? Apallo334 (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- If included at all, I do think it should be much shorter. I think enough secondary sources exist for the topic in general to warrant using some of the primaries (ie. directly referencing Land's The Dark Enlightenment) to expand on detail from the secondaries, but several paragraphs on the cracker factory is quite long without a secondary about it. Perhaps a smaller amount detail on it could be included in the "race" section, maybe as a subsection, since several secondaries already specifically address the topic of race in NRx. Shredlordsupreme (talk) 18:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- How would you exactly rephrase 'The Cracker Factory' in a way you believe fits?
- I think the parts of The Southern Strategy and Black exodus mythology could belong under 'race' Apallo334 (talk) 01:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- I do think those 2 paragraphs you provided are pretty good. Maybe the black exodus mythology part could stay too, as well as the first sentence of the southern strategy part you posted.
- Thinking about it more, maybe it should go in the Cathedral section instead of race, since it's more critiquing the cathedral even though racial politics is a part of it. Shredlordsupreme (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- Black exodus should go to race, The Southern strategy for Cathedral. Apallo334 (talk) 00:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Would this be good enough?
"The Cracker Factory is a political metaphor used by Nick Land in his 2012 essay "The Dark Enlightenment". It serves as a central diagnostic tool in his critique of the modern "Cathedral"—his term for the administrative, academic, and media complex that he argues maintains the progressive status quo in the Anglosphere.
The term is Land's critique of right-wing populism, neo-nationalism, and lower-class Southern American culture which Land argues feeds the Cathedral's thesis–antithesis loop: right-wing backlash strengthens left hegemony by conceding the progressive frame (racial reconciliation, incrementalism), preventing clean breaks into competing city-states. Its nationalism reinforces federal unity, countering the federalist dissolution needed for accelerationist experimentation."
Your nomination of Accelerationism is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Accelerationism is 
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 17:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
[edit]| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive |  |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
Concern regarding Draft:Epistocracy
[edit]
Hello, Shredlordsupreme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Epistocracy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Accelerationism has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Accelerationism has 
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
