User talk:System tinker 90

Welcome!

Hi System tinker 90! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! --JeanClaudeN1 (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demographics of Berlin, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lichtenberg was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Frederick Jelinek

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Frederick Jelinek, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to fix the URL. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Young, Steve (November 2010). "Frederick Jelinek 1932–2010: The Pioneer of Speech Recognition Technology". Speech and Language Processing Technical Committee Newsletter. IEEE Signal Processing Society. {{cite web}}: Check |archive-url= value (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Thanks for contributing to the article Visma. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Please note that per WP:RS "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources". Dormskirk (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the reminder. I'll add more citations and independent sources in case of another edit. The purpose of edit was however to improve structure of the article, as the data and facts remained the same. System tinker 90 (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elster (German tax portal), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Czech News Center

added links pointing to Mladá fronta and Mafra

Mladá fronta Dnes

added a link pointing to Mladá fronta

Oliver Dlouhý

added a link pointing to E15

Oliver Koletzki

added a link pointing to Hurts

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Omio

added a link pointing to Rail Europe

Trainline

added a link pointing to KKR

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 September 2026 (UTC)

Promotional edits and possible COI

Hi! I reverted your edits to Zoho Corporation because they appeared to be promotional, and some of the edit summaries were misleading. For example, you rewrote the lede to be more promotional and to remove sourced information about ownership and left the edit summary "Rewrite lead to reflect Zoho's current businesses and scale". Your edit summary for your revision of the section on Digital sovereignty is particularly problematic - you described this edit as "Rewrite Digital sovereignty section for neutrality and readability" but you actually removed the critical sources altogether and made the section unilaterally promotional for Zoho Corporation. Moving the section below products also served to hide it. Wikipedia is not a product catalogue, the point of an article on a company is to let people see how it has been discussed in reliable sources, not to list the products it sells.

I see you have made similar edits to Omeo and I have reverted them as well. I don't have time to look at all your contributions, but see you tend to edit articles about businesses, often adding WP:TRIVIAL sources about funding and so on, e.g. in Xero.

Do you have a relationship to any of these companies? If so please read WP:COI - you are not permitted to directly edit a page if you are affiliated with its topic or paid by them.

I appreciate you are fairly new to Wikipedia, so if this is a simple misunderstanding no worries - but please for the future do not remove or hide criticisms and controversies from articles without a consensus on the article's talk page, and make sure that your edit summaries are accurate. Thank you!! Lijil (talk) 10:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your explanations and feedback.

I'm not personally related to any of these companies at all, and I'm just interested in articles on Fintech and European Tech.

Could you please also point out which statements do you find promotional in edits for Omio? Those were about adding neutral details on Omio's history, funding and current operations. System tinker 90 (talk) 03:10, 18 September 2026 (UTC)

OANDA Article

Hi. I saw you just created the OANDA article. I have two comments:

• if you have no conflict of interest, you should make an explicit "I have no conflict of interest and no paid editing" statement. Often with articles about companies people will assume that you are trying to promote them. Of course, if you do have a conflict of interest you should say so -- editors have some very creative ways of figuring that out.
• the article desperately (as in right now) needs more independent WP:SIRS sources. WP:NCORP standards are demanding. I just added one from the Globe and Mail and that one is likely to be challenged because it's all about the company (and thus viewed as non-independent) and by a special contributor which is going to be read as some kind of paid article. I did some other searches like on internet archive and I'm seeing some "how to get rich on FX trading" type books but not a lot of independent writing, but I just took a quick look

Did you know similar articles were deleted at least twice? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OANDA and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oanda Corporation. There are sources listed at the 2006 deletion discussion - maybe look at those?

Good luck and act fast! I don't have a lot of time to devote to this. To be 100% clear I think this article should exist, but I also am familiar with companies notability policy and am extremely pessimistic. Oblivy (talk) 22:37, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cegid

added a link pointing to KKR

List of companies of the Czech Republic

added a link pointing to LIAZ

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Docplanner moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Docplanner. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

LLM use

Hello, I'm JTtheOG. An edit that you recently made to Docplanner seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. JTtheOG (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG,

first, let me apologize for submitting these articles for review. Sometimes I was using AI as part of editing process, for outlining content or finding suitable references, which I then always checked. Few times, I used LLM for wording in parts of initial drafts, which were then edited rather substantially. I’m now going through those articles and addressing the sections that clearly still needed more editing. I'm now addressing sections in those articles, that indeed needed more editing. Thanks for your kind response, and for opportunity to improve the articles. Going forward, I’ll be much more careful about Wikipedia’s rules and about machine-generated content. System tinker 90 (talk) 11:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Now I accidentally posted a duplicate of "I'm now addressing sections in those articles..."; sorry for that as well, just a bit stressed from these warnings. System tinker 90 (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Credo Ventures moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Credo Ventures. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:58, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

ETA (Czech company) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to ETA (Czech company). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:59, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Ondřej Bartoš moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ondřej Bartoš. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:07, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Rohlik Group moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rohlik Group. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

ImmoScout24 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to ImmoScout24. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Aleš Zavoral moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aleš Zavoral. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Smartsteuer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Smartsteuer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of AI-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

AI NOTICEBOARD

Hello, an editor has raised a concern about your editing patterns on AI notice board.

Please, join the discussion there. Hasekidms (talk) 22:28, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Hi Hasekidms,

thanks for letting me know here. It's a valid point, I will respond in the discussion. System tinker 90 (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smartsteuer (September 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Helpful Raccoon, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This is a lightly reworded version of the original LLM-generated text. Merely rewording the existing LLM-generated text usually does not resolve the problem of LLM usage; please start over by removing all text from the draft (without removing any review templates). If you need general advice or formatting help, see Help:Your first article and Help:Referencing for beginners. It is typically easiest to write a short draft that summarizes the best sources with critical analysis of the subject that meet all the criteria in WP:42.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Smartsteuer to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Hello, System tinker 90! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aleš Zavoral (September 28)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Helpful Raccoon, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

This is a lightly reworded version of the original LLM-generated text. Merely rewording the existing LLM-generated text usually does not resolve the problem of LLM usage; please start over by removing all text from the draft (without removing any review templates). If you need general advice or formatting help, see Help:Your first article and Help:Referencing for beginners. It is typically easiest to write a short draft that summarizes the best sources with critical analysis of the subject that meet all the criteria in WP:42.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Aleš Zavoral to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:45, 28 September 2026 (UTC)