Repository navigation
Core: Adding additional information in RestException - #14927
Merged
Merged
Conversation
singhpk234
reviewed
Dec 24, 2025
geruh
reviewed
Dec 28, 2025
manuzhang
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
manuzhang
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
donPain
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2026
geruh
reviewed
Jan 22, 2026
nastra
reviewed
Jan 27, 2026
nastra
reviewed
Jan 27, 2026
nastra
reviewed
Jan 27, 2026
nastra
reviewed
Jan 28, 2026
nastra
reviewed
Jan 28, 2026
nastra
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
nastra
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with one remaining comment
singhpk234
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2026
singhpk234
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM as well, thanks @masfworld !
P.S i think comment to this private static function is a bit overkill :), but all good !
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks all for the contribution! @nastra can you merge it? Just to make sure that it's included in the next release |
talatuyarer
pushed a commit
to talatuyarer/iceberg
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2026
zhjwpku
added a commit
to zhjwpku/iceberg-cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2026
While reviewing apache#614, I noticed that `PlanErrorHandler::Accept` does not match the behavior of the Java implementation. A detailed comparison with Java's `ErrorHandlers` revealed several gaps between iceberg-cpp and Iceberg Java. Some of these are oversights in the original implementation, while others correspond to improvements that were made later in Iceberg Java, including: * apache/iceberg#13143 * apache/iceberg#14927 * apache/iceberg#15051 * apache/iceberg#16059 This PR closes those gaps and brings the error handling behavior in iceberg-cpp closer to the Java implementation.
zhjwpku
added a commit
to zhjwpku/iceberg-cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2026
While reviewing apache#614, I noticed that `PlanErrorHandler::Accept` does not match the behavior of the Java implementation. A detailed comparison with Java's `ErrorHandlers` revealed several gaps between iceberg-cpp and Iceberg Java. Some of these are oversights in the original implementation, while others correspond to improvements that were made later in Iceberg Java, including: * apache/iceberg#13143 * apache/iceberg#14927 * apache/iceberg#15051 * apache/iceberg#16059 This PR closes those gaps and brings the error handling behavior in iceberg-cpp closer to the Java implementation.
zhjwpku
added a commit
to zhjwpku/iceberg-cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2026
While reviewing apache#614, I noticed that `PlanErrorHandler::Accept` does not match the behavior of the Java implementation. A detailed comparison with Java's `ErrorHandlers` revealed several gaps between iceberg-cpp and Iceberg Java. Some of these are oversights in the original implementation, while others correspond to improvements that were made later in Iceberg Java, including: * apache/iceberg#13143 * apache/iceberg#14927 * apache/iceberg#15051 * apache/iceberg#16059 This PR closes those gaps and brings the error handling behavior in iceberg-cpp closer to the Java implementation.
wgtmac
pushed a commit
to apache/iceberg-cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2026
While reviewing #614, I noticed that `PlanErrorHandler::Accept` does not match the behavior of the Java implementation. A detailed comparison with Java's `ErrorHandlers` revealed several gaps between iceberg-cpp and Iceberg Java. Some of these are oversights in the original implementation, while others correspond to improvements that were made later in Iceberg Java, including: * apache/iceberg#13143 * apache/iceberg#14927 * apache/iceberg#15051 * apache/iceberg#16059 This PR closes those gaps and brings the error handling behavior in iceberg-cpp closer to the Java implementation.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are scenarios where there are
RESTExceptionissues but the message is not providing value. For instance:So, the idea is to provide
codeandtypeinRESTExceptionto get more context.