-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Using AI to Work on .NET MAUI
This guide helps you use GitHub Copilot effectively when working on the .NET MAUI repository.
- Prerequisites - What you need before starting
- Custom Agents - Specialized agents for specific MAUI tasks
- Reusable Skills - Modular capabilities for common workflows
- Automated Workflows - GitHub Agentic Workflows that run automatically
- Instruction Files - Context-specific coding guidance
- Using Copilot with Git - Let Copilot handle your git operations
- Troubleshooting - Common issues and solutions
Before using the AI agents and skills, ensure you have:
- GitHub Copilot access - Active subscription with CLI or VS Code extension
- VS Code - With GitHub Copilot extension installed
- .NET MAUI development environment - See Windows Install or macOS Install
-
Cloned .NET MAUI repository -
git clone https://github.com/dotnet/maui.git - For Sandbox testing: Android emulator and/or iOS simulator configured
If you use any of our agents or just Copilot in general to work on an issue:
- End with a message summarizing your experience
- Export the chat session:
-
Copilot CLI: Use
/share fileto save as markdown or/share gistto create a GitHub gist - VS Code: Export as JSON
-
Copilot CLI: Use
- Attach the exported session to your PR
The .NET MAUI repository includes specialized AI agents designed to help with specific development tasks. These agents are available through GitHub Copilot and provide expert assistance for common workflows.
In VS Code: Custom Agents in VS Code
In GitHub Copilot CLI: GitHub Copilot CLI
For best results with complex tasks like PR reviews, use plan mode first:
- Press
Shift+Tabto enter plan mode (or use/plan) - Ask Copilot to create a detailed plan for your task
- Review and refine the plan
- Press
Shift+Tabto exit plan mode - Tell Copilot to proceed with the plan
This gives you control over the approach before any actions are taken.
| Agent | Description | Location |
|---|---|---|
| PR Review Workflow | End-to-end workflow for fixing issues and reviewing PRs |
.github/skills/pr-review/SKILL.md + Review-PR.ps1
|
| Write Tests Agent | Determines test type and invokes appropriate testing skill | .github/agents/write-tests-agent.agent.md |
| Sandbox Agent | Manual testing and PR validation with Sandbox app | .github/agents/sandbox-agent.agent.md |
| Learn From PR Agent | Extracts lessons from PRs and applies improvements | .github/agents/learn-from-pr.agent.md |
| Agentic Workflows Agent | Dispatcher for creating, updating, and debugging gh-aw workflows | .github/agents/agentic-workflows.agent.md |
| MAUI Expert Reviewer | Deep 30-dimension code review for the automated pipeline | .github/agents/maui-expert-reviewer.md |
Purpose: End-to-end workflow for investigating issues and reviewing/working on PRs. Orchestrated by Review-PR.ps1 and the pr-review skill.
When to use: When you need to fix an issue (with or without an existing PR), review a PR with independent analysis, or continue work on an in-progress fix.
The workflow runs these steps:
- Gate - Verify tests catch the issue (script-only, no AI)
- Pre-Flight - Context gathering from issues/PRs
- Try-Fix - 4 AI models explore independent fix alternatives
- Report - Expert hardening and final recommendation
Example prompts:
fix issue #12345review PR #12345work on issue #12345continue working on #12345
Purpose: Determines what type of tests are needed and invokes the appropriate skill.
When to use: When creating new tests for issues or PRs.
Supported test types:
-
UI Tests - via
write-ui-testsskill (visual bugs, user interactions) -
XAML Tests - via
write-xaml-testsskill (XAML parsing, compilation, source generation)
Example prompts:
write tests for issue #12345create tests for this PRadd test coverage for CollectionView selection
Purpose: Test and validate PR functionality using the Sandbox app with automated deployment and testing.
When to use: When you want to manually verify a fix works on device/simulator, reproduce an issue, or validate PR functionality.
Example prompts:
test PR #12345 on Androidreproduce issue #12345 in Sandboxtest this PR on iOS
Purpose: Extracts lessons from completed PRs and applies improvements to the repository.
When to use: After complex PRs, when agents struggled to find solutions, or to improve instruction files and skills based on lessons learned.
Example prompts:
learn from PR #12345 and apply improvementsimprove repo based on what we learnedupdate skills based on PR
Purpose: Dispatcher for GitHub Agentic Workflows — helps create, update, debug, upgrade, and report on gh-aw workflows.
When to use: When you need to work with the automated workflow infrastructure (.github/workflows/*.md files and their generated .lock.yml files).
Example prompts:
create a new agentic workflowdebug the agentic-labeler workflowupgrade all workflows to latest gh-aw version
Note: This agent has
disable-model-invocation: true— it routes to specific prompt templates rather than generating solutions itself.
Purpose: Deep PR reviewer that evaluates code across 30 dimensions covering layout, handlers, platform specifics, performance, API design, CollectionView, navigation, XAML, accessibility, and regression patterns.
When to use: Primarily used internally by the code-review skill and the automated PR review pipeline. Can also be invoked directly for thorough per-dimension analysis.
Capabilities:
- Runs per-dimension sub-agent evaluation in parallel
- Writes inline findings as structured JSON
- Covers MAUI-specific patterns that general code review misses
Skills are modular capabilities that provide specialized functionality for common workflows. Think of them as building blocks that can be used directly or composed by agents to accomplish larger tasks.
Skills encapsulate expert knowledge about specific tasks - like writing UI tests, verifying test quality, or exploring fix alternatives. They:
- Reduce errors by encoding best practices and conventions
- Save time by automating repetitive workflows
- Ensure consistency across different contributors
- Enable agents to perform complex multi-step operations
| Aspect | Skills | Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Single-purpose operations | Multi-phase workflows |
| State | Stateless | Track state across phases |
| Invoke | Direct request or by agents | Delegate to agent |
| Output | Specific result (tests, analysis, status) | Complete solution with documentation |
| Example | "Verify these tests fail" | "Fix issue #12345 end-to-end" |
| Skill | Purpose | Example Use |
|---|---|---|
| write-ui-tests | Creates UI tests for GitHub issues | write UI test for issue #12345 |
| write-xaml-tests | Creates XAML unit tests for parsing/compilation | write XAML test for binding issue |
| verify-tests-fail-without-fix | Verifies tests actually catch the bug | Used by agents after test creation |
| run-device-tests | Runs device tests locally on iOS/Android/Windows | run Button tests on iOS |
| run-helix-tests | Submits and monitors unit tests on Helix infrastructure | run XAML unit tests on Helix |
| run-integration-tests | Builds, packs, and runs integration tests locally | run integration tests |
| evaluate-pr-tests | Evaluates test quality, coverage, and appropriateness | evaluate tests on PR #12345 |
| Skill | Purpose | Example Use |
|---|---|---|
| pr-review | End-to-end PR reviewer (Pre-Flight → Try-Fix → Report) | review PR #12345 |
| code-review | Standalone deep code review with MAUI-specific rules | code review PR #12345 |
| try-fix | Attempts ONE alternative fix, tests it, reports results | Used by pr-review in Try-Fix phase |
| pr-finalize | Verifies PR title/description match implementation | finalize PR #12345 |
| find-reviewable-pr | Finds PRs that need review, prioritized by importance | find PRs to review |
| Skill | Purpose | Example Use |
|---|---|---|
| issue-triage | Queries and triages open issues one at a time | triage Android issues |
| learn-from-pr | Analyzes PRs for lessons learned (analysis only) | what can we learn from PR #12345? |
| find-regression-risk | Detects regression risks by comparing PR changes to recent bug fixes | Used by automated pipeline |
| Skill | Purpose | Example Use |
|---|---|---|
| azdo-build-investigator | Investigates Azure DevOps CI failures, Helix logs, binlogs | investigate CI failure on PR #12345 |
| agentic-labeler | Auto-labels issues/PRs with area-* and platform/* labels |
Used by automated workflow |
| dependency-flow | MAUI dependency flow, channel conventions, and feed lookups | feeds for .NET MAUI 10.0 |
See Agent Skills Reference for detailed documentation on each skill, including scripts, parameters, and examples.
The repository uses GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) to automate routine tasks. Each workflow has a source .md file and a generated .lock.yml file — always edit the .md file and run gh aw compile to regenerate the lock file.
| Workflow | Source | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic Labeler | .github/workflows/agentic-labeler.md |
Auto-labels issues and PRs with area-* and platform/* labels based on content |
| Evaluate Tests | .github/workflows/copilot-evaluate-tests.md |
Evaluates test quality and coverage on PRs that add or modify tests (triggered by /evaluate-tests slash command) |
| Daily Repo Status | .github/workflows/daily-repo-status.md |
Generates daily repo activity summaries and insights |
⚠️ Never edit.lock.ymlfiles directly. Edit the.mdsource, then rungh aw compileand commit both files together.
Instruction files provide context-specific coding guidance that Copilot automatically uses when working with matching file patterns. They're located in .github/instructions/ and cover:
| Category | Files | Topics |
|---|---|---|
| Handlers |
handler-patterns, collectionview-* (4 files) |
Mapper rules, lifecycle, null-safety, platform-specific CollectionView guidance |
| Platform |
android, safe-area-ios, threading-async
|
Android coding rules, iOS safe area behavior, threading/async patterns |
| Testing |
uitests, xaml-unittests, helix-device-tests, integration-tests, sandbox
|
Test authoring guidelines per test type |
| Performance |
performance-hotpaths, layout-system
|
Hot-path optimization, layout measure/arrange contract |
| API |
public-api, templates
|
PublicAPI.Unshipped.txt management, template editing rules |
These files are automatically loaded based on glob patterns matching the files you're editing. See .github/copilot-instructions.md for the full pattern-to-file mapping.
GitHub Copilot can handle git operations for you - committing changes, squashing commits, rebasing branches, resolving conflicts, and creating PR descriptions.
See the Using Copilot with Git Guide for detailed examples and prompts.
All agent and skill definitions live in the .github/ directory:
.github/
├── agents/ # Custom agent definitions
│ ├── agentic-workflows.agent.md # Agentic Workflows dispatcher
│ ├── write-tests-agent.agent.md # Test writing agent
│ ├── sandbox-agent.agent.md # Sandbox testing agent
│ ├── learn-from-pr.agent.md # Learning agent
│ └── maui-expert-reviewer.md # 30-dimension PR reviewer
│
├── skills/ # Reusable skills
│ ├── agentic-labeler/ # Auto-labeling
│ ├── azdo-build-investigator/ # CI failure investigation
│ ├── code-review/ # Deep code review
│ ├── dependency-flow/ # Dependency flow & feeds
│ ├── evaluate-pr-tests/ # Test quality evaluation
│ ├── find-regression-risk/ # Regression risk detection
│ ├── find-reviewable-pr/ # PR discovery
│ ├── issue-triage/ # Issue triage
│ ├── learn-from-pr/ # PR analysis
│ ├── pr-finalize/ # PR finalization
│ ├── pr-review/ # End-to-end PR review orchestrator
│ ├── run-device-tests/ # Device test execution
│ ├── run-helix-tests/ # Helix test submission
│ ├── run-integration-tests/ # Integration test execution
│ ├── try-fix/ # Fix exploration
│ ├── verify-tests-fail-without-fix/ # Test verification
│ ├── write-ui-tests/ # UI test creation
│ └── write-xaml-tests/ # XAML test creation
│
├── instructions/ # Context-specific coding guidance
│ ├── uitests.instructions.md
│ ├── xaml-unittests.instructions.md
│ ├── sandbox.instructions.md
│ ├── handler-patterns.instructions.md
│ └── ... (17 files total)
│
├── pr-review/ # PR review phase instructions
│ ├── pr-preflight.md # Pre-flight context gathering
│ ├── pr-gate.md # Gate verification rules
│ └── pr-report.md # Report generation
│
├── scripts/ # Orchestration scripts
│ ├── Review-PR.ps1 # PR review pipeline orchestrator
│ ├── BuildAndRunHostApp.ps1 # UI test host app builder
│ ├── BuildAndRunSandbox.ps1 # Sandbox app builder
│ ├── Find-RegressionRisks.ps1 # Regression risk detector
│ ├── EstablishBrokenBaseline.ps1 # Baseline management for try-fix
│ ├── post-ai-summary-comment.ps1 # Posts AI review summary to PR
│ └── shared/ # Shared utilities
│
├── workflows/ # GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw)
│ ├── agentic-labeler.md # Auto-labeling workflow
│ ├── copilot-evaluate-tests.md # Test evaluation workflow
│ └── daily-repo-status.md # Daily status report
│
└── copilot-instructions.md # Main repository instructions
Long-running operations are normal:
- PR Agent full workflow: 25-60 minutes total
- Test verification: 5-15 minutes per platform
- Sandbox builds: 5-10 minutes first build
If truly stuck, check if there's a prompt waiting for input. You can also try: "what's the current status?"
- Verify you're testing on the correct platform
- Check if the reproduction steps from the issue are complete
- Try asking: "show me the test scenario and what it's checking"
- If tests pass when they shouldn't, the test scenario may not match the bug
Before running tests or agents:
- Build the MSBuild tasks first:
dotnet build Microsoft.Maui.BuildTasks.slnf - Ensure you have the correct .NET SDK (check
global.json)
Gate fails when tests don't properly catch the bug. Common causes:
- Tests pass without the fix (tests don't reproduce the bug)
- Tests fail with the fix (fix doesn't work)
- Wrong platform being tested
Ask: "why did Gate fail?" for specific guidance.
For long workflows, use plan mode to maintain control:
-
Shift+Tabto enter plan mode - Create a plan for your task
- Execute in smaller steps
You can also use /share file to save progress before continuing.