Monthly Review Press

Independent Socialist
Publishing Since 1952

Featured

Monopoly, Finance, and the Crisis of Capitalism: Paul M. Sweezy and His Legacy, by Amos Cecchi

Monopoly, Finance, and the Crisis of Capitalism

Paul M. Sweezy and his Legacy

Amos Cecchi

The first-ever biography of Paul M. Sweezy, the scholar who brought Marxian theory to the English-speaking world and one of the greatest political economists of the twentieth century.

“Marx once observed that the end point of fierce inter-capitalist competition was the exercise of monopoly power. Contemporary capitalism exhibits the truth of this observation, with the Hi-Tech companies very much in the driver’s seat. A return to a careful consideration of Paul Sweezy’s theorization of monopoly capital is therefore very much to be welcomed.” – David Harvey

New releases

"Black Marxism"

“Black Marxism”

August Nimtz

Requiem for French Theory

Requiem for French Theory

Aymeric Monville, Gabriel Rockhill, Jennifer Ponce de Leon

The Ragged Edge of Freedom

The Ragged Edge of Freedom

Matthew E. Stanley

Classics

Open Veins of Latin America

Open Veins of Latin America

Eduardo Galeano, Isabel Allende

Discourse on Colonialism

Discourse on Colonialism

Aimé Césaire

Return to the Source

Return to the Source

Tsenay Serequeberhan, Amilcar Cabral

Albert Einstein’s “Why Socialism?"

Albert Einstein’s “Why Socialism?”

Albert Einstein, John Bellamy Foster

Coming Soon

The Exterminating Empire

The Exterminating Empire

Chris de Ploeg, Jason Hickel

Grand Theft Capital

Grand Theft Capital

Fred Magdoff, John Bellamy Foster

Digitalization in India

Digitalization in India

The Research Unit for Political Economy

Authors

News

  • The latest: "During the 1960s and 1970s, it was an oft-repeated quip that the European left was long on theory and short on practice, while the North American left was strong on action, but allergic to theory…." The post New! “Requiem for French Theory” appeared first on Monthly Review.
  • The latest: Einstein's perspective links alienation and nuclear annihilation, capitalism to the devastating possibility of omnicide — the destruction of all human life on earth. As the U.S. approaches its 250th anniversary…. The post “Albert Einstein’s ‘Why Socialism?'” appeared first on Monthly Review.
  • The latest, from Paul Buhle: "Abolitionists and social reformers of all kinds, with a wide Yankee following augmented by many recent German immigrants, sought to take things beyond the uneasy accommodation of white populations to each other across existing political lines. In Wisconsin and in Chicago most notably, these would include “Abe’s Boys” enrolling in the army of the Union. Not so in the Southern Illinois, two hours’ drive from my hometown. The whites who immigrated northward from the near South, largely uneducated and lacking skills, came to be considered almost a species in themselves…." The post New! Matthew Stanley’s […]
  • The latest: "….Epicurus for Marx was a plus because he was very critical of religion or teleology – the notion that the gods or God determined things on earth. He rejected that without rejecting religion completely. And he emphasized that the basis of human life was community, friendship; building a society based on friendship. He was the first to bring women into philosophy – allowing them to emerge as major philosophers within the Epicurean school – and also slaves. He couldn’t do anything about slavery itself, but he brought slaves into Epicurean philosophy…." The post John Bellamy Foster’s “Breaking the […]
  • This was the first live launch of the Socialist Register in New York City, with our brand new editor, Arun Kundnani, alongside the (relatively new) coeditor of the Socialist Register, Steve Maher, joined by three contributors to this year’s volume: Ibrahim Shikaki, Costas Lapavitsas, and Paul Heideman. Together they considered these and other questions: The post WATCH: Socialist Register 2026 appeared first on Monthly Review.
  • The latest, in Le Monde: "En 1999, une historienne britannique, Frances Stonor Saunders, a décrit dans Who Paid the Piper? CIAand the Cultural Cold War ( Qui mène la danse ? La CIA et la guerre froide culturelle , Denoël, 2003) comment la CIA infiltrait la culture des années 1950 et 1960 par l’entremise de fondations commeFord ou Rockefeller. Gabriel Rockhill prolonge cette enquête en montrant comment les Etats-Unis ontutilisé ces mêmes canaux pour influencer les théoriciens de gauche – notamment ceux de l’école deFrancfort – afin de rendre leurs idées compatibles avec le capitalisme…." The post Gabriel Rockhill’s “Who […]

Subjects