Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Paolo Tasca

Paolo Tasca (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely UPE based on the author's single edit and the history at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Tasca (professor) and en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Tasca. He does not seem to pass GNG or NPROF standards. The sources here are primary for the most part or show passing mention of him. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:27, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Paola Santana

Paola Santana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The claims in this article feel "audacious" and hard to prove. The claim of creating the first constitutional court in a nation is significant, but I can find no proof that she actually did aside from summaries of her bio in articles/interviews. It definitely has UPE vibes with the author making no other edits until 5 years later for another individual. Many of the sources are dead or unavailable, and many do not show significant coverage of her but rather her companies. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Palazzo Vigoni

Palazzo Vigoni (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find any sources that show this is a notable residential building. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:31, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Palazzo Vigentina

Palazzo Vigentina (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find any sources that show that this is a notable residential building. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Paintings of Scottish monarchs

Paintings of Scottish monarchs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Maybe out of project scope? I'm not sure that a gallery of paintings is necessary. I'm not sure of a precedent for this. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:20, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Padum Pukhuri

Padum Pukhuri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this pond. No sources show it is significant. If kept, significant copy editing is needed. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:31, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

.flow

.flow (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not clearly a notable game. Looks like it’s a fan game inspired by a more notable game. Needs sources to prove it is notable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:25, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:25, 23 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pa Sulay Njie

Pa Sulay Njie (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources don't confirm him as someone who has played at an upper level of international soccer/football. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pa Sulay Njie which concluded this as non-notable and a potential hoax. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:51, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:51, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

PBS Kids Preschool Block

PBS Kids Preschool Block (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources can be found that show that this is a notable block of programming. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oxana Saichuk

Oxana Saichuk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this athlete. The sources only provide confirm that she competed in these competitions in the form of boxscores or database type entries. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:40, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:40, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dashnak offensive into Iranian Azerbaijan

Dashnak offensive into Iranian Azerbaijan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I cannot verify the information and sources to determine if this is a notable event. Searching for the sources results in their names in various bibliographies, but I cannot locate the sources themselves. Significant verifability issues. If kept, better sources will be needed and simplification must occur. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:24, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

House of Okori

House of Okori (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article doesn't clearly demonstrate the notability of this house with reliable sources. The sources are mostly about achievements of individuals who are claimed to be part of this house, or are unreliable research papers. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:38, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Toshiba satellite CL10-B-100

Toshiba satellite CL10-B-100 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No clear notability of this particular model of laptop is shown. En. has an article on the series of laptops and a table with the models, but not individual articles on the models. We certainly don't need a specs list like this as we're not a consumer/tech guide. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:34, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Houma Hunter Lime with Paint Maker

Houma Hunter Lime with Paint Maker (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability is shown for this video game. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:24, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Houma Hunter Lime: Special Collection Vol. 1

Houma Hunter Lime: Special Collection Vol. 1 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability is shown or verifiable for this video game. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:22, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hoor Fatima

Hoor Fatima (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established with reliable sources. The Daily Exlesior and the The Tribute read like press releases. Doesn't seem to be notable overall -- she won a specific tournament for under 6 year olds, not a grander achievement. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:52, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Homophrosyne

Homophrosyne (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this term/word. It's basically a dicdef here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:39, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Holy Family (Amisani)

Holy Family (Amisani) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this painting. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• and what reason do you have for it to be deleted since you didn't give one Ieditsandyes (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

• As stated, there isn't notability shown. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:59, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hijan Hirao

Hijan Hirao (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is not established for this poem/text. The text is not mentioned, as far as I can see, in either of the two sources listed. The two other references are a book review of a translation of the text and a link to buy that translation. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:32, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hierarchy of victimhood (identity politics)

Hierarchy of victimhood (identity politics) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article seems to be synthesis where the author is suggesting that one researcher's opinion is the same as another commentator's term and therefore they're the same topic. There really isn't a solid connection established here via sources (or even by the author's writing). The term doesn't seem to be significant enough overall to require an article. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Isotopes of unbihexium

Isotopes of unbihexium (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Has enough content to clear A1, I believe, but overall says nothing. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Element 118 was recently named Oganesson. It is radioactive, and seems to have a half-life of less than 1ms. It was artificially created, Very little was produced, properties are mostly unknown. The Element we are talking about above is 126, situation will likely be similar. So, if the thing is man made, but does not have known properties because it simply dies not exist long enough to determine them, where is the notability? - delete-Eptalon (talk) 19:24, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:19, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hikari Senju

Hikari Senju (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable individual -- the sources provided are questionable. It suffers from the same potentially AI generated sources of en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omneky (2nd nomination). The non-AI ones aren't sigfnificant coverage. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:15, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Submarine Jim (2nd nomination)

Submarine Jim (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not shown, sources not independent, and claims it was shown in June 2026 Peterdownunder (talk) 22:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per nom and my original RFD at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/Submarine Jim which closed as a SOFTDELETE. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:10, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per both nominations. Notability has not been shown for this TV show, and I couldn't find anything online that would support it either. Garsh (talk) 04:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:54, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Owen Spencer-Thomas

Owen Spencer-Thomas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable oerall. The MBE is more minor than it may sound. Coverage isn't significant and is very local in nature. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:15, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Overthrow of Da Yuezhi

Overthrow of Da Yuezhi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be a significant/notable event. It's mentioned in the course of two sentences in the one source and the other source is impossible to determine. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:13, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Oversimplification

Oversimplification (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads as original research. Doesn't provide any sources and show anything verifiable. CountryANDWestern (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:11, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ougri festival

Ougri festival (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through significant coverage in reliable sources. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:03, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Osseo Library

Osseo Library (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. Sources are primary in nature with the exception of one local news story and one press release (maybe?) from an organizaiton. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:02, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Orsolya Szalkay

Orsolya Szalkay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown through reliable sources; sources only establish existence. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Science and Star Wars

Science and Star Wars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability for this webseries isn't shown. Sources just confirm it was announced basically. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Schönfeldvorstadt

Schönfeldvorstadt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cannot verify its borough status. Best I can find is that it seems to have been absorbed into another borough perhaps 100+ years ago. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:35, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Schleederbaach

Schleederbaach (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this water feature. Looks like a creek from images. Nothing in a Google Search to show that this is a notable feature. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Schizophrenic insight

Schizophrenic insight (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is kind of all over the place and I can't say that it seems like a topic "worthy" of an article. It's defining the word insight in general... It's talking about words having meaning. It's talking about how literacy may be similar to insight. Overall, it's not a clear focus and it's not clear that this concept is notable and clearly defined. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Peppa Pig: The Golden Boots

Peppa Pig: The Golden Boots (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not all that notable of a TV episode. Reviews aren't from too reliable of sources it appears. It's also a complex copy of the draft version of this at En. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh, you still think so? You still think I made a mistake here? So, in that case, can I turn this into a redirect? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 15:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Okay, decision made... And I decided to turn this into a redirect page, to avoid so much confusion... So, what do you think? Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 21:38, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh, what a... So, good luck... :( Sarah Vilela Anjos Pereira (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:51, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vikas Gupta

Vikas Gupta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown. The "awards" are just appointed chairs of conferences or editor positions for non-notable publications. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:46, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kazakhstan in the Eurovision Song Contest

Kazakhstan in the Eurovision Song Contest (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No real content here but a little bit more than the QD standards. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:44, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Tekcham

Tekcham (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown for this surname. The first source doesn't link to the name... It links to/highlights another name. The second one isn't in English so I can't verify. However, both sources, if verifiable, would only prove its existence, not anything about its notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:29, 21 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

David Hryck

David Hryck (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person. Sources provided are primary or passing mentions, and I could not find any more online. Does not pass the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 21:49, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

I have added a few sources that support the claims made in his article, and many of them are not trivial/passing mentions. ~2026-22670-58 (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Syed Hasan Imam Rizvi Zangipuri

Syed Hasan Imam Rizvi Zangipuri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I could find no sources with an online source, and those provided in the articles are mostly interviews and videos of events. This subject does not pass the WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 21:46, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Socks have been blocked. Please add actual votes below.

Strong keep – The nomination does not sufficiently satisfy deletion standards under Wikipedia policy. Per WP:BEFORE, a thorough search for reliable sources must be conducted prior to nomination. The claim that no sources exist appears premature and may reflect incomplete searching, particularly for regional, print, or non-English/Urdu sources which are often not easily accessible online.

Furthermore, the subject is likely to meet WP:GNG as there is a reasonable expectation of significant coverage in independent sources. The current reliance on interviews or event-based references does not negate notability; rather, it indicates that the article requires improvement, not deletion.

Per WP:SIGCOV, notability is based on the existence of significant coverage, not merely the current state of citations within the article. Absence of inline citations is an editorial issue, not grounds for deletion.

Additionally, per WP:ATD (Alternatives to Deletion), improvement, sourcing, or tagging (e.g., {{more citations needed}}) should be preferred over removal.

Deletion at this stage would be premature and against the spirit of Wikipedia’s inclusion principles. The article should be improved and expanded with proper sourcing instead.

Recommendation: Keep and improve. Alex Renford (talk) 06:03, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Strong keep – The nomination appears premature and does not fully comply with WP:BEFORE, which requires a diligent search for reliable sources prior to proposing deletion. The absence of easily accessible online citations does not equate to a lack of notability, especially for subjects covered in regional, print, or non-English sources.

The subject plausibly meets WP:GNG through likely significant coverage in independent sources. Current references such as interviews or event documentation do not disqualify the topic; they simply indicate that the article is underdeveloped. Per WP:SIGCOV, notability depends on the existence of coverage, not the current completeness of citations in the article.

Additionally, Wikipedia is not limited to online-only verification. Offline and regional sources are valid per policy, and their absence in the article at present reflects an editorial gap, not a notability failure.

Per WP:ATD (Alternatives to Deletion), the correct approach here is improvement, not removal. Tagging the article for better sourcing (e.g., {{refimprove}} or {{more citations needed}}) and allowing time for expansion would align with Wikipedia’s content development process.

There is also no clear evidence presented that the subject fails notability; instead, the rationale relies on current sourcing limitations, which is insufficient for deletion.

Conclusion: Keep and improve. Deletion would be premature and contrary to policy. Jesus Alvarez Calderon (talk) 06:08, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Strong keep – The nomination fails to meet the required standard for deletion and appears premature. Under WP:BEFORE, nominators are expected to conduct a thorough and good-faith search for reliable, independent sources. The assertion that sources do not exist is not substantiated and likely reflects a limited search, particularly given the common availability of coverage in regional, print, or non-English media.

Crucially, the burden of proof lies with the nominator to demonstrate that the subject does not meet notability guidelines. Simply pointing to a lack of currently formatted inline citations does not satisfy this burden. Per WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, notability is determined by the existence of significant coverage in reliable sources, not the present condition of the article.

The argument presented conflates verifiability with notability. These are distinct concepts: an article may be poorly sourced yet still be notable. In such cases, Wikipedia policy clearly favors improvement over deletion.

Per WP:ATD (Alternatives to Deletion), there are multiple appropriate remedies short of deletion, including:

• Adding reliable sources
• Tagging with {{refimprove}} or {{more citations needed}}
• Expanding the article with verifiable content

No evidence has been provided that the subject fails notability; rather, the rationale is based on current sourcing gaps, which is explicitly insufficient for deletion. Additionally, many biographies from underrepresented regions are systemically under-documented online, and immediate deletion in such cases contributes to systemic bias.

Conclusion: Keep. The article requires improvement, not deletion. The nomination does not meet policy-based grounds for removal. Shah Syed Muhammad Ali (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep – The article may currently lack strong sourcing, but that is an issue of improvement rather than notability. It is likely that reliable sources exist but have not yet been added. Per WP:ATD, improving and expanding the article would be more appropriate than deletion. JabirAhmedAnsari (talk) 06:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Note: All AI-sockpuppets reported. NDG (talk) 06:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Some of the Sources available are N:POV maybe keep article and suggest for improvement! ~2026-23149-19 (talk) 14:33, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

I would recommend keeping the article. While it’s true that some of the currently cited sources are interviews or event-based coverage, that does not automatically disqualify the subject from meeting notability guidelines. Such sources can still contribute to establishing notability, especially if they come from reputable outlets.

Additionally, the lack of strong inline citations at present appears to be more of a sourcing gap than evidence of non-notability. This is a fixable issue. A reasonable approach would be to retain the article and tag it for improvement, giving editors the opportunity to add more robust, independent, and secondary sources.

Per WP:BEFORE, deletion should be a last resort, and further source searching may yet yield better coverage. Therefore, I support keeping the article and improving it rather than deleting it at this stage. ~2026-23147-86 (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

I would recommend keeping the article. While it’s true that some of the currently cited sources are interviews or event-based coverage, that does not automatically disqualify the subject from meeting notability guidelines. Such sources can still contribute to establishing notability, especially if they come from reputable outlets.

Additionally, the lack of strong inline citations at present appears to be more of a sourcing gap than evidence of non-notability. This is a fixable issue. A reasonable approach would be to retain the article and tag it for improvement, giving editors the opportunity to add more robust, independent, and secondary sources.

Per WP:BEFORE, deletion should be a last resort, and further source searching may yet yield better coverage. Therefore, I support keeping the article and improving it rather than deleting it at this stage. ~2026-23147-86 (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:46, 20 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Michigan Auto Law Firm

Michigan Auto Law Firm (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established. As noted in en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michigan Auto Law, mentions are trivial/passing and not in-depth coverage of the law firm. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:00, 20 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dmitrii Lavrutov

Dmitrii Lavrutov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Weak claims to notability. Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:39, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep – The article meets notability requirements. Lavrutov has verifiable credits in two internationally recognized films: The Delinquents (2023), selected as Argentina's official entry for Best International Feature Film at the 96th Academy Awards, and Eureka (2023), which premiered at the 2023 Cannes Film Festival under director Lisandro Alonso. He is listed on IMDb (nm16736675) and has over 2 million followers on Instagram. The article has been significantly improved with independent sources. Ym9837054 (talk) 21:59, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Notability not established with reliable sources. IMDB, Apple Music, and Instagram can't be used to establish the notability here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:28, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete none of the sources in the article currently can be used to establish his notability, as none of them are significant, independent and reliable (not just any one of the three). Searching for other potential sources yielded nothing.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:39, 19 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Richard murphy

Richard murphy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seemingly non-notable professor, does not meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:44, 18 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mathieu Blondeau

Mathieu Blondeau (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:14, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:14, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mohammad Abu Sheikh

Mohammad Abu Sheikh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Abu Sheikh. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:32, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yuko Umeda

Yuko Umeda (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, created by now globally banned user Slowking4. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:03, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yuki Fushimi

Yuki Fushimi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, a single appearance on the Japan national team and that's it. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zeyno Günenç

Zeyno Günenç (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:58, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:58, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zero Install

Zero Install (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero-install. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:57, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zoe Creed

Zoe Creed (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, and WP:BIO1E. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:55, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:55, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Principality of Kagame

Principality of Kagame (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This micronation also has little evidence of notability. Garsh (talk) 04:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Quick delete – Appears to be a fabricated micronation with no coverage in reliable, independent sources; the cited source is unreliable and does not mention the subject. Details are unverifiable or implausible (e.g., micro-area, unverified individuals, online “membership”), and it misuses symbols like the Flag of Brunei. Fails verifiability and notability; qualifies for QD A6 (hoax). – Erakilos 𐤀 04:56, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kingdom of Sagony

Kingdom of Sagony (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested QD: There appears to be no evidence of notability for this Micronation. The sources provided are unrelated and others online do not satisfy the WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Gurphy

Gurphy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, fails WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:37, 17 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

GeoSpy (2nd nomination)

GeoSpy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Continues to fail GNG. The last RfD was a discussion that probably should have been left to settle rather than close as no consensus (see User talk:FusionSub#GeoSpy RfD). There were three sources bought up at the RfD that never had the chance to be scrutinised before it was closed, the MSPowerUser source is the only one that has any significance. The opentools.ai source isn't reliable and the studyflix.de source actually has no relevance whatsoever, it's a source on learning German. That combined with the complex and potentially AI-generated tone of this article now make this a clear delete in my view. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete, fails WP:GNG. Ternera (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Quickly deleted as G7. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Windows Tiger

Windows Tiger (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Potential hoax; even if real, no notability is established through reliable sources. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep. There is a statement in the article that Windows Tiger *may* be a hoax. Readmymind8777 (talk) 20:05, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

  Ok what about the notability? CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

  The sources I provided were the best I could find. Readmymind8777 (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2026

•  Delete If we don't have enough sources to even prove it is real then how are we even supposed to prove it is notable? Fails WP:V. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 20:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete I am the author of the article, and I created it after seeing that Neptune and Odyssey have articles. Maybe I should have waited until there are reliable sources on Windows Tiger. Readmymind8777 (talk) 20:48, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:51, 20 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 17:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Template:IP Viewed

Template:IP Viewed (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I do not see any good use for this template. If an IP has been viewed, that does not have to, and shouldn't, be disclosed, and it isn't really relevant to the point we have to be tagging talk pages if we do. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:05, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete -- Agreed. I don't see the purpose of this and am awaiting a response on the creator's talk page to see what they believe the need is. I note that it has been transcluded on two TAs' talk pages by the creator despite them not having TAIV access. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete -- Agreed. I rethought it and found no purpose. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
• Delete I agree with the above comments. PieWriter (talk) 07:10, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
•  Delete – Per Ferien; If an IP has been viewed, it does not need to, and shouldn't, be disclosed. Erakilos 𐤀 07:28, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:05, 15 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Nevermind -- this is a sock puppet so G5. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Daumier Corilla

Daumier Corilla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No clear indication of notability through sources. Doesn't show that this title is a significant one. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:12, 22 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 15:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Long Lake Library

Long Lake Library (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established for this library branch. Provided sources are primary in nature. Coverage in outside sources seems to be routine local news. No claim to notability in article. En. handles this as a redirect to the county system it is a part of. Reasonable outcome here as well. CountryANDWestern (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: I've personally seen no issue in primary sources, as they are just describing the history of a rather uncontrovertial building. I see no reason why the fact that by this being narrated by Hennepin County Library themselves changes the credibility of this specific case. Nevertheless, I do understand the concerns of notability of the article. Thanks :) Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 01:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

  Primary sources can't be used to establish notability, though. You need outside, independent sources to do so. CountryANDWestern (talk) 11:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:45, 31 March 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. QD as creator is sock of globally banned Slowking4 CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Mary Haverstick

Mary Haverstick (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't look notable to me per WP:AUTHOR. Barras talk 22:39, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work. This work has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length movie, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."--Townstail (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.