Current Issue Highlights
- June 06, 2026: 69(7):489-489
Integrating Occupational Health and Safety Into the Artificial Intelligence System Life Cycle
May 12, 2026: 69(7):491-502Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are rapidly transforming the workplace, performing tasks once limited to human intelligence such as decision-making, prediction, and pattern recognition. While AI adoption offers opportunities to improve productivity, it can also create new occupational hazards and alter working conditions in ways that may harm worker health, safety, and wellbeing. Despite broader and growing attention to safe and responsible AI, there is limited integration of occupational health and safety (OHS) principles into AI design and adoption decisions. This paper outlines a framework for embedding an OHS perspective throughout the AI system life cycle, from problem definition to system retirement. The framework aims to ensure that safety, fairness, and worker wellbeing are prioritized in AI. We describe key OHS goals for each phase of the AI life cycle and describe practical strategies to support implementation. These strategies include participatory co-design with workers, equitable data collection, model training and validation that identify and minimize safety risks, transparent deployment practices, and continuous monitoring and retraining guided by risk management frameworks. We emphasize collaboration among AI system developers, OHS professionals, and worker and workplace representatives, to anticipate and address emerging risks. Integrating OHS principles into the AI system life cycle not only helps prevent harm but also fosters worker trust, strengthens system reliability, and promotes sustainable technological adoption. Embedding OHS principles into AI development ensures that the technology contributes to, rather than compromises, the protection and wellbeing of workers in a changing world of work.
Changes in Work Arrangements, Psychosocial Working Conditions, and Worker Well-Being Between 2018 and 2022: Evidence From the General Social Survey
May 10, 2026: 69(7):560-574Background
We used national-level data to compare worker demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, work arrangements, psychosocial working conditions, safety and health, job security, wages and benefits, and worker health and well-being before the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2018, and in the late stage of the pandemic, in 2022. Understanding these changes helps inform some of the potential ways these factors may shape the future of work.
Methods
We analyzed self-reported and publicly available data from the 2018 and 2022 waves of the General Social Survey (GSS)—Quality of Worklife (QWL) module, focusing on adults working part-time or full-time. We describe differences in the broad categories of interest mentioned above, as well as subcategories within each. For example, we assessed changes in psychosocial working conditions by focusing on subcategories that included job demands, job control, role conflict, resource adequacy, job support, work flexibility, and work and family interface, that is, the boundaries between work and family life. We used Mann–Whitney tests to assess statistically significant changes, using weighted, nationally representative worker samples (N = 1473 in 2018; N = 2112 in 2022).
Results
Between 2018 and 2022, we observed two changes in work arrangements; the share of independent contractors increased (from 12.4% to 14.4%) while the share of those working full-time decreased (from 81.3% to 78.5%). Psychosocial conditions exhibited mixed trends; job demands and control showed marginal improvement, while role conflict, resource adequacy, and job support worsened. The share of workers who mainly worked at home increased (6.6%–17.2%), alongside those experiencing family-work conflict (from 26% to 32%). Health and well-being also worsened, with more workers reporting lower job satisfaction and very often feeling used up (from 13.1% to 16.0%). In addition, workers reported more days in poor mental health (from 3.6 to 4.4 days) and days with activity limitations (from 1.6 to 2.2) in the past 30 days.
Conclusions
The quality of worklife in 2022 differed meaningfully from 2018, though not uniformly for better or worse. For example, increases in working at home and the share of independent contractor arrangements suggest different potential long-term consequences for worker well-being. Continued monitoring and more nuanced analyses are essential to understanding the evolving future of work.
Issue Information
May 10, 2026: 69(6):397-397Workplace Productivity Cost Associated With Psychological Distress in the United States
May 07, 2026: 69(7):525-539Introduction
Psychological distress (PD) is negatively associated with workplace productivity.
Objective
To estimate the potential workplace productivity cost of PD related to absenteeism and presenteeism in the United States, and to break down this cost by broad industry sector.
Method
We used data from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey, which included questions on absenteeism and presenteeism, and applied a human capital approach to quantify absenteeism and presenteeism cost associated with PD. We measured PD using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) and categorized the presence or severity of PD as: no (K6 = 0), mild (K6 = 1–4), moderate (K6 = 5–12), and severe (K6 ≥ 13) PD. We used workers reporting no PD as the reference group. Our regression models included sociodemographic, economic, health, and workplace covariates.
Results
In 2021, 16,356 sampled adults represented 151 million US workers. Among these workers, 3.8 million (2.5%) reported experiencing severe, 24.0 million (15.9%) moderate, and 57.4 million (38.0%) mild PD. Our regression estimates suggest that the total PD-related absenteeism and presenteeism cost that year was between United States Dollars (USD) 90.1 and 118.2 billion, excluding additional costs related to injury, turnover, disability claims, and early retirement. We also observed statistically significant differences in estimated total and per-worker cost of PD across seven broad industry sectors. Total PD-related cost was highest in the services sector (USD 53.9 billion), followed by healthcare and social assistance (USD 19.7 billion) and wholesale and retail trade (USD 12.4 billion). On a per-worker basis, we observed the highest cost in healthcare and social assistance (USD 950), services (USD 732), and wholesale and retail trade (USD 731).
Conclusion
Our findings showed large and uneven burden of PD across different industries manifested through absenteeism and presenteeism. This burden may be reduced, and productivity enhanced, through improvement in work organization, the implementation of psychosocial risk management strategies, and the expansion of mental health interventions. Investments in workplace mental health may generate returns comparable to other capital investments largely through lowering absenteeism and presenteeism costs.
Latest Articles
Issue Information
American Journal Of Industrial Medicine. June 06, 2026: 69(7):489-489Integrating Occupational Health and Safety Into the Artificial Intelligence System Life Cycle
American Journal Of Industrial Medicine. May 12, 2026: 69(7):491-502Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are rapidly transforming the workplace, performing tasks once limited to human intelligence such as decision-making, prediction, and pattern recognition. While AI adoption offers opportunities to improve productivity, it can also create new occupational hazards and alter working conditions in ways that may harm worker health, safety, and wellbeing. Despite broader and growing attention to safe and responsible AI, there is limited integration of occupational health and safety (OHS) principles into AI design and adoption decisions. This paper outlines a framework for embedding an OHS perspective throughout the AI system life cycle, from problem definition to system retirement. The framework aims to ensure that safety, fairness, and worker wellbeing are prioritized in AI. We describe key OHS goals for each phase of the AI life cycle and describe practical strategies to support implementation. These strategies include participatory co-design with workers, equitable data collection, model training and validation that identify and minimize safety risks, transparent deployment practices, and continuous monitoring and retraining guided by risk management frameworks. We emphasize collaboration among AI system developers, OHS professionals, and worker and workplace representatives, to anticipate and address emerging risks. Integrating OHS principles into the AI system life cycle not only helps prevent harm but also fosters worker trust, strengthens system reliability, and promotes sustainable technological adoption. Embedding OHS principles into AI development ensures that the technology contributes to, rather than compromises, the protection and wellbeing of workers in a changing world of work.
Issue Information
American Journal Of Industrial Medicine. May 10, 2026: 69(6):397-397
Most Popular Articles
A Report on The Health of Asbestos, Quebec Miners 1940
American Journal Of Industrial Medicine. September 2005: 48(3):230-237Background
Twenty years after the start-up of the Canadian asbestos industry, reports began to appear of respiratory disease and deaths in asbestos workers in England and in France. An inquiry from the UK in 1912 as to the health of Quebec miners was met by a denial of ill-health, but the loading of the premiums of asbestos workers in the 1930s indicated that, despite further reassuring health studies on Quebec miners, actuaries had data that gave cause for serious concern.
Methods
A report made to the Canadian asbestos industry by a company doctor in 1940, reviewing the literature and presenting his health findings on some 500 employees, was studied in the context of the published information available at the time, and of unpublished contemporaneous material subsequently obtained by legal discovery.
Results
The physician denied that the health and longevity of Quebec's miners and millers were adversely affected, and was dismissive of earlier reports of there being serious health risks associated with working with asbestos.
Conclusions
The methodology employed in his health study was defective and his denial of the literature uninformed. The study was widely circulated, and while it may have boosted Canadian industry morale, it met with a sceptical response from British industry. In denying that conditions in Quebec's asbestos mines and mills disabled and killed workers, the author allied himself to fellow professionals loyal to Government and to industry.
Occupational noise exposure and asymmetric hearing loss
American Journal Of Industrial Medicine. June 2020: 63(6):535-542Perspectives on Environmental and Occupational Exposures and Cancer Risk From Florida's Wildland Firefighters
American Journal Of Industrial Medicine. January 2026: 69(1):14-23



