[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

Tweet
This is a modified version of the Internet RFC suitable for machine-translating. Original version is available here: RFC214
Ad

UNKNOWN
Network Working Group                              21 August 1971
Request for Comments 214                           E. Harslem-Rand
NIC 7195
Category: F
Obsoletes: 193, 198
NETWORK CHECKOUT


As of August 21 we had performed the following verifications
with the sites listed below. These verifications were done on an arranged basis and do not indicate any degree of continuous availability.

In the category "NCP-107" the heading is somewhat misleading.
It does not indicate a thorough checkout of all the NCP functions described in Document 1 and RFC-107. It only indicates that the NCP in question functioned to the extent required to respond to a RESET (a necessary condition for the Rand NCP to consider the remote host "up") and that the NCP performed the functions necessary for an ICP. Thus, this column really indicates only a small degree of NCP completeness. Such function as ECHO, Give Back, error message generation and so on were not checked. We have checked some of these functions with UCSB and SDC but not exhaustively. This is mainly due to the tedium of such a process. BBN is currently writing a protocol certifier for their DDP-516 host that will do this automatically.
                                  User   Server          Access
               NCP-107  ICP-156  Telnet  Telnet  Logger  Service
UCLA Sigma7 x x x x x x UCLA /91 x x x x na x SRI NIC x x ? ? ? UCSB x x x x na x BBN A10 x x x x x BBN TIP x x x x na MIT Multics x ? MIT DMCG x x x x x x SDC x x x x ? LINCOLN /67 x x x x x x UTAH TENEX being installed


LEGEND:

--- the function has not been verified for the host

x--- the function has been verified for the host na-- the function is not applicable to the host due to its
                                                                [Page 1]

21 Auguest 1971                                                  RFC 214
operating system or intended network use

?--- a comment follows for that function in that host


COMMENTS:

SRI NIC -- both a server telnet and logger exist; however, they
do not process the telnet messages correctly

MIT Multics -- we were only able to connect to an interim
logger that sent a 'ts' message

SDC -- the logger causes the system to crash following login


Any discrepancies should be noted via phone call. This
RFC will be updated in about one month.




[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by Brian Court 6/97 ]


























[Page 2]


Ad
Translate documents to 日本語, svenska, Nederlands, Deutsch, français, русский, italiano, español, Tiếng Việt, polski, português, 中文, українська, català, norsk, فارسی, suomi, Bahasa Indonesia, العربية, čeština, 한국어, Bahasa Melayu, magyar, română, српски and other languages.
inserted by FC2 system