About your general remark, you are definitely right. Shareholders should always be in a position to decide themselves how to reinvest their due. Yet, for fiscal "optimization" or others weak reasons, it is not always the case.
As for the REITs, they have their flaws. In its last half-year report, the REIT you mentioned, speaks of a gearing (asset gearing I presume) of about 33,5%. Besides, the discrepancy between the interests of the managers and those of the unitholders can create serious problems. I am sure you understand well that it is completely different...
As for the REITs, they have their flaws. In its last half-year report, the REIT you mentioned, speaks of a gearing (asset gearing I presume) of about 33,5%. Besides, the discrepancy between the interests of the managers and those of the unitholders can create serious problems. I am sure you understand well that it is completely different...
(24-02-2014, 11:23 PM)greengiraffe Wrote: Cannot fault them for searching for new business to park their hard earned $.
However, they should return excess $ and let investors decide on what they prefer to do.
If you really prefer to invest in neighbourhood malls, Shopping Centre Australasia will be the listed REIT spinoff from Woolworths for direct considerations:
http://www.scaproperty.com.au/
Vested
Odd Lots
Homepage
